Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 83, Issue 5, pp 849–859

Increasing HIV Testing Among Latinos by Bundling HIV Testing with Other Tests

  • Frank H. Galvan
  • Ricky N. Bluthenthal
  • Chizobam Ani
  • Eric G. Bing


Latinos in the United States are disproportionately impacted by HIV/AIDS. They accounted for 20.4% of the AIDS cases reported in 2003, despite the fact that they represent 13.3% of the civilian non-institutional population of the United States. Thus it is important to identify ways to increase HIV testing among Latinos engaging in high risk behaviors. One approach that has been proposed for increasing HIV testing is the “bundling” of HIV prevention interventions with other relevant services. This study examined whether offering HIV testing with screening for other conditions would increase HIV testing among Latino men who frequent gay bars. A cross-sectional survey of 394 Latino men was conducted at both urban and suburban gay bars. Overall, no statistical differences were found in the number of individuals who took the HIV test or who tested HIV-positive when the HIV test was offered with screening for other conditions (alcohol problems, drug dependence, depression, syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia) compared to when it was offered by itself. However, multivariate analysis found that three groups of Latino men were more likely to test for HIV when it was bundled with other tests: those who reported having sex primarily with women, those with other risk factors that could also be tested through a bundled test approach, and those who were clients of the suburban gay bar that was farthest from a large geographical gay community. Further studies of bundled HIV testing should be conducted with other key subpopulations that may be more willing to take an HIV test when it is offered with other relevant tests than when offered by itself.


Bundling HIV Latinos Prevention Sexually transmitted diseases 


  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. 2003 (Vol. 15). Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ramirez RR, de la Cruz GP. The Hispanic Population in the United States: March 2002. Current Population Reports, P20-545. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Census Bureau; 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late versus early testing of HIV—16 sites, United States, 2000–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:581–586.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson DF, Sorvillo FJ, Wohl AR, et al. Frequent failed early HIV detection in a high prevalence area: Implications for prevention. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2003;17:277–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ickovics J. Innovation in HIV Prevention Research: Structural Interventions to Promote Individual Health and Social Change. Presented at: “HIV Research: The Next Generation,” hosted by the UCLA/Charles Drew University/RAND Center for HIV Identification, Prevention and Treatment Services (CHIPTS); 2005, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eppen GD, Hanson WA, Martin RK. Bundling—new products, new markers, low risk. Sloan Manage Rev. 1991;32:7–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon H, Wuebker G. Bundling—A powerful method to better exploit profit potential. In: Fuerderer R, Herrmann A, Wuebker G, eds. Optimal Bundling: Marketing Strategies for Improving Economic Performance. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer;1999:9–28.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kellerman SE, Lehman JS, Lansky A, et al. HIV testing within at-risk populations in the United States and the reasons for seeking or avoiding HIV testing. J Acquir Immune Defi Syndr. 2002;31:202–210.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among clients of HIV counseling and testing sites—Connecticut, 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:577–581.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farley TA, Cohen DA, Wu S-Y, et al. The value of screening for sexually transmitted diseases in an HIV clinic. J Acquir Immune Defic Synd. 2003;33:642–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Late versus early testing of HIV—16 sites, United States, 2000–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:581–586.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adoption of protective behaviors among persons with recent HIV infection and diagnosis—Alabama, New Jersey, and Tennessee, 1997–1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49:512–515.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weinhardt LS, Carey MP, Johnson BT, Bickham NL. Effects of HIV counseling and testing on sexual risk behavior: A meta-analytic review of published research, 1985–1997. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1397–1405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Los Angeles County Department of Health Services & UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. The Burden of Disease in Los Angeles County: A Study of the Patterns of Morbidity and Mortality in the County Population. Los Angeles County Department of Health Services & UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, January 2000. Available at: Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cherpitel CJ. Brief screening instruments for alcoholism. Alcohol Health Res World. 1997;21:348–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cherpitel CJ. A brief screening instrument for problem drinking in the emergency room: The RAPS4. Rapid Alcohol Problems Screen. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61:447–449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simpson DD, Knight K. TCU Data Collection Forms for Correctional Residential Treatment. Texas Christian University Institute of Behavioral Research, 1998. Available at: Scholar
  18. 18.
    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1997;1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soler J, Perez-Sola V, Puigdemont D, et al. Estudio de validación del Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression (CES-D) en una población española de pacientes con trastornos afectivos. Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines. 1997;25:243–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stata [computer program]. Version 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank H. Galvan
    • 1
  • Ricky N. Bluthenthal
  • Chizobam Ani
  • Eric G. Bing
  1. 1.Drew Center for AIDS Research, Education and ServicesCharles R. Drew University of Medicine and ScienceLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations