Neighborhood Influences and Intimate Partner Violence: Does Geographic Setting Matter?
- 422 Downloads
Intimate partner violence is one health-related outcome that has received growing attention from those interested in the role of neighborhood context. A limitation of existing contextual health research is its' failure to look beyond urban settings. Because suburban and rural areas have received so little attention, it is not clear whether data generated from urban samples can be generalized to non-urban geographic settings. We began to explore this issue using concept mapping, a participatory, mixed method approach. Data from 37 urban and 24 suburban women are used to explore and compare perceptions of neighborhood characteristics related to intimate partner violence. While several similarities exist between the perceptions of participants residing in urban and suburban areas, some differences were uncovered. These results provide valuable information regarding the perceived relationship between neighborhood context and intimate partner violence and suggest future avenues for research interested in examining the role of geographic setting.
KeywordsGeographic setting Intimate partner violence Neighborhood
- 1.Kramer A, Lorenzon D, Mueller G. Prevalence of intimate partner violence and health implications for women using emergency departments and primary care clinics.Women Health Issues. 2004;14(1):19–29.Google Scholar
- 9.Rajaratman J, Burke JG, O'Campo P. (Accepted, Pending Revision). Maternal & child health and neighborhood residence: a review of the selection and construction of area-level variables.Google Scholar
- 12.Block C. Does neighborhood collective efficacy make a difference behind closed doors? Presented at the American Sociological Association conference, August 2002.Google Scholar
- 17.Bernard HR. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira; 1995.Google Scholar