Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 244–252 | Cite as

Avoiding Free Care at All Costs: A Survey of Uninsured Patients Choosing Not to Seek Emergency Services at an Urban County Hospital

  • Saul J. Weiner
  • Jonathan B. VanGeest
  • Richard I. Abrams
  • Arthur Moswin
  • Richard Warnecke
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this case study was to understand why many uninsured patients opt not to make use of a free public hospital when it is available, instead seeking emergency department care at sites where they will be billed for the services they receive. One hundred fifty seven uninsured patients were interviewed over an 8-week period at three emergency departments that bill for services near a county hospital that provides free care. Data was gathered on income, health status, and credit history. Subjects were also asked if they had previously sought care at the county hospital and, if they had, how satisfied they were with the quality of care and with the wait time. Seventy two percent of the subjects reported household incomes of <$20,000, 48% reported they were in fair or poor health, and 33% said they were unable to pay at least one medical bill at the site where they were seeking care. 65% reported they had previously received care at the county hospital, and of these 61% said they were not-too-likely or not-at-all likely to return. In a regression analysis, experience with wait time correlated with subjects willingness to return, whereas their satisfaction with quality, their income, problems with debt, and reported health status did not. Access involves more than geographic proximity and affordability. Excessive wait times can deter even patients who are poor, in ill health and in debt from making use of services that are intended for their benefit.

Keywords

Access to care Emergency care 

References

  1. 1.
    US GAO. EMTALA Implementation and Enforcement Issues. Report to Congressional Committees 01–742; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fields WE. Defending America's Safety Net. Report of the American College of Emergency Physicians 1998–1999 safety net task force. Dallas, Texas: American College of Emergency Physicians; 1999.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Himmelstein DU, Warren E, Thorne D, Woolhandler S. Illness and injury as contributors to bankruptcy. Health Aff. 2005;W5-63–W5-73.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewin ME, Altman S, eds. America's Health Care Safety Net: Intact but Endangered. Washington, District of Columbia: National Academy; 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kennedy J, Rhodes K, Walls CA, Asplin BR. Access to emergency care: restricted by long waiting times and cost and coverage concerns. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:567–573.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    US General Accounting Office. Hospital Emergency Departments: Crowded Conditions Vary Among Hospitals and Communities. Washington, District of Columbia: General Accounting Office; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Derlet R, Richards J. Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments; complex causes and disturbing effects. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35:63–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lambe S, Washington DL, Fink A, et al. Waiting times in California's emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:35–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burt CW, Arispe IE. Characteristics of emergency departments serving high volumes of safety-net patients: United States, 2000. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2004;13(155).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gordon JA. The hospital emergency department as a social welfare institution. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:321–325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glauser J. Rationing and the role of the emergency department as society's safety net. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1101–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiss SJ, Derlet R, Arndahl J, et al. Estimating the degree of emergency department overcrowding in academic medical centers: results of the national ED overcrowding study. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:38–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bindman AB, Grumback K, Keane D, et al. Consequences of queuing for care at a public hospital emergency department. JAMA. 1991;266:1091–1096.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Survey_Questionnaires/NHIS/2004/english/. Accessed October 7, 2005.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Current Population Survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics and Bureau of the Census. http://www.bls.gov/cps/home.htm. Accessed October 7, 2005.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Survey of Consumer Finances. Federal Reserve Board and Department of the Treasury. Administered by National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. http://www.norc.uchicago.edu/projects/scf/homepage.htm. Accessed October 7, 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    UIC Survey Research Laboratory. http://www.srl.uic.edu/. Accessed October 7, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    42 United States Code Annotated, Section 1395dd [1985].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Derlet RW. Overcrowding in emergency departments: increased demand and decreased capacity. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:430–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson DA, Yarnold PR, Willams DR, Adams SL. Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(6):657–665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boudreaux ED, d'Autremont S, Fleming L, Ary RD, Jones GN. Patient satisfaction in the emergency department: 1,001 ways to analyze your data. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36(4):S31–S32.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Diamant AL, Hays RD, Morales LS, et al. Delays and unmet need for health care among adult primary care patients in a restructured urban public health system. AJPH. 2004;94:783–789.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andersen RM, Yu H, Wyn R, et al. Access to medical care for low-income persons: how do communities make a difference? Med Care Res Rev. 2002;59:384–411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saul J. Weiner
    • 1
  • Jonathan B. VanGeest
  • Richard I. Abrams
  • Arthur Moswin
  • Richard Warnecke
  1. 1.College of MedicineUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations