Learning Inquiry

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 13–27 | Cite as

Learning and organizations: towards cross-metaphor conversations

Article

Abstract

Discussions on learning in organizations are characterized by the diversity of perspectives involved and the variety of their disciplinary roots. This is an effort to identify the roots of some metaphors employed in this literature. It is argued that cross-metaphor conversations can contribute to the richness of discussions in the field. Some specific instances where more than one metaphor is employed are identified. The promises of certain “disruptive devices” to facilitate such desirable cross-metaphor interactions are briefly explored.

Keywords

Learning metaphors Organizational learning 

References

  1. Allert, H. (2004). Coherent social systems for learning: An approach for contextualized and community-centred metadata. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (2). http://www.jime.open.ac.uk/2004/2. Accessed 10 Dec 2005.
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Baerveldt, C., & Verheggen, T. (1999). Enactivism and the experiential reality of culture: Rethinking the epistemological basis of cultural psychology. Culture and Psychology, 5(2), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Toronto: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Brocklesby, J., & Mingers, J. (2005). The use of the concept autopoiesis in the theory of viable systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 22(1), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. Carley, K. (2001). Adaptive organizations and emergent forms. http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/asa.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2006.
  10. Cox, W. C., & Minahan, S. (2005). Organization, decoration. Organization, 12(4), 529–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, W. C., & Minahan, S. (2006). Organizational decoration: A new metaphor for organization development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(2), 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawkins, R. (1977). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. De Loo, I. (2006). Action and organizational learning in an elevator company. The Learning Organization, 13(3), 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elkjaer, B. (1999). In search of a social learning theory. In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organisational learning and the learning organization (pp. 75–91). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Emmeche, C., Køppe, S., & Stjernfelt, F. (1997). Explaining emergence: Towards an ontology of levels. http://www.nbi.dk/~emmeche/coPubl/97e.EKS/emerg.html. Accessed 9 Feb 2006.
  16. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  17. Ernst, D., & Lundvall, B. (1997). Information technology in the learning economy: Challenges for developing countries, DRUID working paper No. 97–12. http://www.druid.dk/wp/pdf_files/97-12.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2006.
  18. Gabora, L. (1996). A day in the life of a meme: The nature, representation and evolution of concepts. http://users.lycaeum.org/~sputnik/Memetics/day.life.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2006.
  19. Gioia, D. A., & Poole, P. P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, M. (2006). Knowledge management and the limits of knowledge codification. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10. http://www.abs.aston.ac.uk/newweb/research/publications/docs/RP0438.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2006.
  21. Harrison, R. (1996). Action learning: Route or barrier to the learning organization. Journal of Workplace Learning, 8(6), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hart, J. (2003). Organizational orienteering: Charting the terrain. American Communication Journal, 6(2). http://www.acjournal.org/holdings/vol6/iss2/articles/hart.htm. Accessed 5 Sept 2006.
  23. Hayek F. (1936). Economics and knowledge. Presidential address delivered before the London Economic Club, 10 November, 1936, http://www.virtualschool.edu/mon/Economics/HayekEconomicsAndKnowledge.html. Accessed 10 Feb 2006.
  24. Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (pp. 3–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. L., & Kirsh, D. (1999). Distributed cognition: A new foundation for human-computer interaction. http://www.hci.ucsd.edu/lab/hci_papers/JH1999-2.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2006.
  26. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.Google Scholar
  27. Hunt, J. G. (2003). What is leadership? In A. T. Cianciola, R. J. Sternberg, & J. Antonakis (Eds.), The Nature of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://www.jhunt.ba.ttu.edu/Documents/WHAT%20IS%20LEADERSHIP_Latest.doc. Accessed 8 Feb 2006.
  28. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Huysman, M. (1999). Balancing biases: A critical review of literature on organizational learning. In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organisational learning and the learning organization (pp. 59–74). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  31. Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Johnson, B., & Lundvall, B. (2001). Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge? Paper presented at the DRUID ACADEMY Winter Conference, January 18–20, Korsør. http://www.business.auc.dk/druid/conferences/winter2001/paper-winter/Paper/johnson_lundvall.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2006.
  33. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (1998). Mental models: a gentle guide for outsiders. http://www.si.umich.edu/ICOS/gentleintro.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2005.
  34. Kim D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35(Fall), 37–50.Google Scholar
  35. Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Critical ontology: Visions of selfhood and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 19(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
  36. Krippendorf, K. (1993). Major metaphors of communication and some constructivist reflections on their use. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 2(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
  37. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lipshitz, R., & Popper, M. (2000). Organizational learning in a hospital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: MUP. http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/lyotard.htm. Accessed 26 Jan 2006.
  40. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  41. Marquardt M. J. (1999). Action learning in action: Transforming problems and people for world-class organizational learning. Palo Alto: Davies-Black.Google Scholar
  42. Minsky, M. (1974). A framework for representing knowledge. Artificial Intelligence Memo No. 306. MIT, AI Lab., http://www.web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2006.
  43. Minsky, M. (1990). Logical vs. analogical or symbolic vs. connectionist or neat vs. scruffy’, In P. H. Winston (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence at MIT, Expanding Frontiers, Vol.1, Massachussetts: MIT Press. http://www.web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/SymbolicVs.Connectionist.html. Accessed 1 Jan 2007.
  44. Monin, N., & Monin, J. D. (1997). Rhetoric and action: When literary drama tells the organisation’s story. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Nooteboom, B. (2003). Elements of a cognitive theory of the firm. Paper from The symposium on cognition and economics, Great Barrington, MA, USA, 17–20 July. http://www.bartnooteboom.nl/Khalilpap3.PDF. Accessed 25 Jan 2008.
  48. OECD (1996) The knowledge based economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2005.
  49. Oswick, C., Keenoy, T., & Grant, D. (2002). Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organizational theory: Beyond orthodoxy. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Othman, R., & Hashim, N. A. (2004). Typologizing organizational amnesia. The Learning Organization, 11(2/3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prange, C. (1999). Organizational learning: Desperately seeking theory? In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization: developments in theory and practice (pp. 23–43). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Price, I. (1995). Organizational memetics? Organizational learning as a selection process. Management Learning, 26, 299–318.Google Scholar
  53. Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Roos, J., & Oliver, D. (1999). From fitness landscapes to knowledge landscapes. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(3), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rothwell, W. J. (1983). Bateson’s hierarchy of learning. Training and Development Journal, 37(7), 24–27.Google Scholar
  56. Schmitt, R. (2005) Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394. http://www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR10-2/schmitt.pdf. Accessed 5 Sep 2006.
  57. Senge, P. M. (1990) The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  58. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
  59. Star, S. L., & Greisemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations,” and coherence: Amateurs and professional in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stenmark, D. (2000). Leveraging tacit organizational knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 9–24.Google Scholar
  61. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189–208. http://www.psychclassics.yorku.ca/Tolman/Maps/maps.htm. Accessed 28 Jan 2006.Google Scholar
  62. Tsoukas, H. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tsoukas, H. (1993). Analogical reasoning and knowledge generation in organization theory. Organization Studies, 14(3) 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tsoukas, H. (1996). The Firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 11–25.Google Scholar
  65. Vicari, S., von Krogh, G., Roos, J., & Mahnke, V. (1996). Knowledge creation through cooperative experimentation. In G. von Krogh & J. Roos (Eds.), Managing knowledge: Perspectives on cooperation and competition (pp. 184–202). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Vince, R. (2004). Action learning and organizational learning: Power, politics and emotion in organizations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walsh, J. P. (1995). Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weeks, J., & Galunic, C. (2003). A theory of the cultural evolution of the firm: An intra-organizational ecology of memes. Organization Studies, 24(8), 1309–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weick, K., & Roberts, K. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whitaker, R. (1995). Autopoeitic theory and social systems: Theory and practice. http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigois/auto/AT&Soc.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2006.
  73. Wilkins, J. S. (1998). What’s in a meme? Reflections from the perspective of the history and philosophy of evolutionary biology. Journal of Memetics—Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2(1). http://www.jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/vol2/wilkins_js.html. Accessed 27 Jan 2006.

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xavier Institute of ManagementBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations