Advertisement

Emergency Management in Critical Infrastructures: A Complex-Event-Processing Paradigm

  • Vuk MijovićEmail author
  • Nikola Tomašević
  • Valentina Janev
  • Mladen Stanojević
  • Sanja Vraneš
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Critical infrastructures (CI) are difficult to handle due to their complexity, size and the number of stakeholders involved. During emergency situations (e.g. fire or terrorist attack), a CI operator in the control room is faced with a flood of information coming from different sensors and legacy monitoring systems. Since in these situations, time is critical and the operators are under a great deal of pressure, a holistic management of all the technical systems and actors involved is needed, reinforced by the Recommendation and Decision Support System (RDSS) that helps emergency managers to take correct and timely decisions. One way to provide an adequate RDSS support to the operator is proposed in this paper which is based on an intelligent, event driven layer that sits on top of the legacy CI monitoring system. Powered by the complex event processing capabilities and facility data model implemented in the form of CI ontology, this layer processes events originating from different sources, conducts the situation and risk assessment, and reacts accordingly, either automatically or via recommendations proposed to emergency personnel. To validate the proposed approach, an event-driven RDSS was deployed on an airport use case (Nikola Tesla airport in Belgrade), as one of the most complex CIs.

Keywords

Emergency management event-driven decision support complex event processing emergency personnel training 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuja S.P., Patel A (2011). Enterprise service bus: A performance evaluation. Communications and Network 3(3): 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anagnostopoulos C., Hadjiefthymiades S (2013). Multivariate context collection in mobile sensor networks. Computer Networks, 57(6): 1394–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anfar S (2014). WSO2 ESB performance round 7.5, http: //wso2.com/library/articles/2014/02/esbperformance–round–7.5/Google Scholar
  4. Benaben F., Hanachi C., Lauras M., Couget P., Chapurlat V (2008). A metamodel and its ontology to guide crisis characterization and its collaborative management. 5th International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 189–196.Google Scholar
  5. Bettelini M., Rigert S., Seifert N (2013). Optimum emergency management through physical simulation–Findings from the EMILI research project. World Tunnel Congress, Geneva, pp. 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharosa N., Lee J., Janssen M (2010). Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi–agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(1): 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braut G.S., Rake E.L., Aanestad R., Njå O (2012). Risk images as basis for decisions related to provision of public services. Risk Management, 14(1): 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Büscher M., Liegl M., Thomas V (2015). Collective intelligence in Crises. Social Collective Intelligence: Combining the Powers of Humans and Machines (243–265), Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell B.D., Mete H.O., Furness T., Weghorst S., Zabinsky Z (2008). Emergency response planning and training through interactive simulation and visualization with decision support. IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, Waltham, MA, 176–180.Google Scholar
  10. Chen R., Sharman R., Rao H. R., Upadhyaya S. J (2008). Coordination in emergency response management. CACM, 51(5): 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Maio A., Fenza G., Gaeta M., Loia V., Orciuoli F (2011). A knowledge–based framework for emergency DSS. Knowledge–Based Systems, 24(8): 1372–1379.Google Scholar
  12. Dunkel J., Fernández A., Ortiz R., Ossowski S (2011). Event–driven architecture for decision support in traffic management systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6): 6530–6539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Endsley R (1995). Towarda theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems: Situation awareness. Human Factors, 37: 32–64.Google Scholar
  14. Endsley M.R., Connors E.S (2008). Situation awareness: State of the art. Power and Energy Society General Meeting: Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1–4.Google Scholar
  15. Etzion O., Niblett P (2011). Event Processing in Action, Manning Publications Co., Stamford.Google Scholar
  16. Fan Z., Zlatanova, S (2010). Exploring ontology potential in emergency management. Gi4DM Conference–Geomatics for Disaster Management, Torino, Italy, 109–122.Google Scholar
  17. Franke J., Charoy F., Ulmer C (2011). Handling conflicts in autonomous coordination of distributed collaborative activities.20th IEEE Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Infrastructures (IEEE WETICE 2011), Paris, France, 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fogli D., Guida G (2013). Knowledge–centered design of decision support systems for emergency management. Decision Support Systems, 55: 336–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrald J., Jefferson T (2007). Shared situational awareness in emergency management mitigation and response. 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2007), Waikoloa, Big Island, HI, USA, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hausmann S., Brodt S., Bry F (2011). Dura: Concepts and Examples. Technical Report, University of Munich.Google Scholar
  21. Hausmann S., Bry F (2013). Towards complex actions for complex event processing. 7th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event–based Systems (DEBS 2013), Arlington, Texas, USA, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hernández J.Z., Serrano J.M (2001). Knowledge–based models for emergency management systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 20(2): 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ICAO (2004). Aerodromes–Annex 14 to the convention on international civil aviation. ICAO International Standards and Recommended Practices(4 ed). http: //www.icao.int/Google Scholar
  24. IEC (2003). IEC 61970: Energy management system application program interface–Part 451: CIS information exchange model for SCADA, International Electrotechnical Commission.Google Scholar
  25. Janev V., Mijović V., Tomašević N., Kraus, L., Vraneš S (2012). Dynamic workflows for airport emergency management training. 23rd International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2012), Vienna, Austria, 5–9.Google Scholar
  26. Kostas K., Panagidi K., Hadjiefthymiades S (2013). Optimal spatial partitioning for resource allocation. 10th International ISCRAM Conference, Baden–Baden, Germany, 747–757.Google Scholar
  27. Kraus L., Stanojević M., Tomašević N., Mijović V (2011). A decision support system for building evacuation based on the EMILI SITE environment. IEEE 20th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE 2011), Paris, France, 334–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kraus L., Janev V., Vraneš S (2012). Different approaches to ICT–enhanced emergency management. 56th ETRAN Conference, Zlatibor, Serbia, VI2.7–1–4Google Scholar
  29. Lauras M., Benaben F., Truptil S., Charles A (2015). Eventcloud platform to support decision–making in emergency management.Information Systems Frontiers, 17(4): 857–869.Google Scholar
  30. Liu X., Li W., Tu Y.L., Zhang W.J (2011). An expert system for an emergency response management in networked safe service systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 11928–11938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luckham D.C (2011). The power of events: An introduction to complex event processing in distributed enterprise systems, Addison–Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
  32. Maciejewski R., SungYe K., King–Smith D., Ostmo K., Klosterman N., Mikkilineni A.K., Ebert D.S., Delp E.J., Collins T.F (2008). Situational awareness and visual analytics for emergency response and training. IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, Waltham, MA, 252–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malewski C., Simonis I., Terhorst A., Bröring A (2014). StarFL–a modularised metadata language for sensor descriptions. International Journal of Digital Earth 2014, 7(6): 450–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mijović V., Vraneš S (2011). Asurvey and evaluation of CEP tools. 17th Conference and ExhibitionYUINFO,Kopaonik, Serbia, 638–642.Google Scholar
  35. Mijović V., Janev V., Vraneš S (2013). Main challenges in using LOD in emergency management scenarios. 24th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2013), Prague, Czech Republic, 21–25.Google Scholar
  36. Mitra K., Saguna, Ahlund, C (2014). A mobile cloud computing system for emergency management.IEEE Cloud Computing, 1(4): 30–38.Google Scholar
  37. Monares Á., Ochoa S.F., Pino J.A., Herskovic V., Rodriguez–Covili J., Neyem A (2011). Mobile computing in urban emergency situations: Improving the support to firefighters in the field. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(2): 1255–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moulik S., Misra S., Obaidat M.S (2015). Smart–evac: Big data–based decision making for Emergency Evacuation. IEEE Cloud Computing, 2(3): 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mühl G., Fiege L., Pietzuch P (2006). Distributed Event–Based Systems. Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Nüst D., Janowicz K., Maué P., Bröring A., Malewski C (2011). Semantically–enabled sensor plug & play for the Sensor Web. Molecular Diversity Preservation International Sensors, 11(8): 7568–7605.Google Scholar
  41. Pohl D., Bouchachia A., Hellwagner H (2013). Supporting crisis management via detection of sub–events in social networks. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (IJISCRAM), 5(3): 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qiu M., Ming Z., Wang J., Yang L.T., Xiang Y (2014). Enabling cloudcomputing in emergency management systems. IEEE Cloud Computing, 1(4): 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sagun A., Bouchlaghem D., Anumba C. J (2009). A scenario–based study on information flow and collaboration patterns in disaster management. Disasters, 33(2): 214–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tomašević N., Konečni G (2011). Generic message format for integration of SCADA–enabled emergency management systems. 17th Conference and Exhibition YU INFO, Kopaonik, Serbia, 71–76.Google Scholar
  45. Tomašević N., Batić M., Konečni G., Vraneš S (2012). Ontology–based airport data model. 2nd International Conference on Information Society Technology ICIST, Kopaonik, Serbia, 158–163.Google Scholar
  46. Vraneš S., Stanojević M., Janev V., Tomašević N., Mijović, V (2010). EMILI deliverable D6.3 "Design of the first prototype of the integrated EMILI–SITE system".Google Scholar
  47. Vraneš S., Stanojevic M., Janev V., Mijovic V., Tomasevic N., Kraus L., Ilic Z (2011). Application of complex event processing paradigm in situation awareness and management. 22nd InternationalWorkshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications(DEXA 2011), Toulouse, France, 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vraneš S., Stanojević M., Janev V., Tomašević N., Mijović V., Kraus L (2013). EMILI Deliverable D6.7 "Documentation and on–line tutorial".Google Scholar
  49. Waugh W. L., Streib G (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review, 66: 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vuk Mijović
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nikola Tomašević
    • 1
  • Valentina Janev
    • 1
  • Mladen Stanojević
    • 1
  • Sanja Vraneš
    • 1
  1. 1.The Mihajlo Pupin InstituteUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations