Advertisement

A Coupled Dynamic Model of Brand Acceptance and Promotive Information Spreading

  • Qian Pan
  • Haoxiang Xia
  • Shuangling Luo
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

When people try to decide to buy or not to, they are often influenced by both their inherent opinions and the social marketing activities e.g. advertising, social news with strong point of view. Then people will make their final choice, or even convince other people to buy. After all, this is the brand acceptance formation process. Factually, the dynamics of brand acceptance is essentially an interwoven dynamics of endogenous opinion dynamics disturbed by an information diffusion process. To have a better understanding of the dynamics of brand acceptance, we propose and analyze a coupled agent-based dynamic model that combines the Majority-Rule-based Voter model in opinion dynamics with the SI Model for information spreading to analyze the dynamics of brand acceptance in social media. We focus on two important parameters in diffusion dynamics: the decayed transmission rate (β) and the diffusion frequency (f). When the system is stable, the order parameter of the system is the duration time (τ). In the absence of opinion interaction, the simulation results indicate that, when a brand tries to occupy a larger market share through social marketing approaches, it is always effective to let the opponent to be the propaganda target. While with the Majority-Rule-based Voter Model included, we observe that the opinion interaction could have a dual function, which shows that a brand holding a small market share in the first place needs to adopt diverse marketing approaches according to different marketing environment types.

Keywords

Coupled dynamics social marketing dynamics of brand acceptance opinion dynamics diffusion dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant Nos. 71401024, 71371040 and 71533001, respectively.

References

  1. [1]
    Grönlund, A. & Holme, P. (2005), “A network–based threshold model for the spreading of fads in society and market”, Advances in Complex Systems. 8 261–273.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Holley, R.A. & Liggett, T.M. (1975), “Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting Infinite Systems and the Voter Model”, Annals of Probability. 3(4), 643–663.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Castellano, C., Vilone, D. & Vespignani, A. (2003), “Incomplete ordering of the voter model on small–world networks”, Europhysics Letters(EPL). 63(1), 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Castellano, C., Fortunato, S. & Loreto, V. (2007), “Statistical physics of social dynamics”, Review of Modern Physics. 81(2), 591–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Wang C., & Tang X. (2016) “The Online Debate Networks Analysis: A Case Study of Debates at Tianya Forum”. In: Chen J., Nakamori Y., Yue W., Tang X. (eds.): Knowledge and Systems Sciences, Proceedings of 17th International symposium on knowledge and systems sciences, KSS 2016, Springer, pp. 140–150.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Castillo–Chavez, C., Huang, W. & Li, J. (1996), “Competitive Exclusion in Gonorrhea Models and Other Sexually Transmitted Diseases”, Siam Journal on Applied Mathematics. 56(2), 494–508.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Stauffer, D. (2005). “Sociophysics simulations II: opinion dynamics”.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Schweitzer, F. & Hołyst, J.A. (2000), “Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active Brownian particles”, The European Physical Journal B–Condensed Matter and Complex Systems. 15(4), 723–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lafley, A.G. & Charan, R. (2008), “The Game–Changer: How You Can Drive Revenue and Profit Growth with Innovation”, Enterprise/salt Lake City. 26(5), 97–99.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Zanette, D.H. (2001), “Dynamics of rumor propagation on small–world networks”, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics. 65(4 Pt 1), 041908.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Dornic, I.e.a. (2001), “Critical coarsening without surface tension: the universality class of the voter model”, Physical Review Letters. 87(4), 045701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Leskovec, J., Adamic, L.A. & Huberman, B.A. (2005), “The Dynamics of Viral Marketing”, Acm Transactions on the Web. 1(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hołyst, J. & Kacperski, K. (2001), Social impact models of opinion dynamics.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Shao, J., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S. & Stanley, H.E. (2011), “Cascade of failures in coupled network systems with multiple support–dependence relations”, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics. 83(2), 1127–1134.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Frachebourg, L. & Krapivsky, P.L. (1995), “Exact Results for Kinetics of Catalytic Reactions”, Physical Review E Statistical Physics Plasmas Fluids & Related Interdisciplinary Topics. 53(4), R3009–R3012.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Lewenstein, M., Nowak, A. & Latané, B. (1992), “Statistical mechanics of social impact”, Physical Review A. 45(2), 763–776.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J.P., Moreno, Y. & Porter, M.A. (2013), “Multilayer networks”, Ssrn Electronic Journal. 2(3), 261–268.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mobilia, M. & Redner, S. (2003), “Majority versus minority dynamics: phase transition in an interacting two–state spin system”, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics. 68(2), 046106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Rachaniotis, N., Dasaklis, T.K. & Pappis, C. (2017), "Controlling infectious disease outbreaks: A deterministic allocation–scheduling model with multiple discrete resources", Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. 26(2), 219–239.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kotler, P. & Zaltman, G. (1975), “Social marketing: an approach to planned social change”, In: Inter–Governmental Coordinating Committee. 35(3), 3–12.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Chen, P. & Redner, S. (2005), “Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions”, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics. 71(3 Pt 2A), 036101.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Pastor–Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. (2001), “Epidemic dynamics and endemic states in complex networks”, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics. 63(2), 066117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Lambiotte, R., Saramäki, J. & Blondel, V.D. (2009), “Dynamics of latent voters”, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics. 79(4 Pt 2), 046107.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Dodds, P.S. & Watts, D.J. (2005), “A generalized model of social and biological contagion”, Journal of Theoretical Biology. 232(4), 587–604.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Galam, S. (2000), “Real space renormalization group and totalitarian paradox of majority rule voting”, Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications. 285(1–2), 66–76.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Galam, S. (2002), “The September 11 attack: A percolation of individual passive support”, The European Physical Journal B. 26(3), 269–272.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Milgram, S. (1974), “Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View”, London. 8(5), 312.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., Genio, C.I.D., Gómez–Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Sendiña–Nadal, I., Wang, Z. & Zanin, M. (2014), “The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks”, Physics Reports. 544(1), 1–122.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Galam, S. & Wonczak, S. (2000), “Dictatorship from majority rule voting”, The European Physical Journal B–Condensed Matter and Complex Systems. 18(1), 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Cox, J.T. (1989), “Coalescing Random Walks and Voter Model Consensus Times on the Torus in Zd”, Annals of Probability. 17(4), 1333–1366.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Andreasen, V., Lin, J. & Levin, S.A. (1997), "The dynamics of cocirculating influenza strains conferring partial cross–immunity", Journal of Mathematical Biology. 35(7), 825.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Hethcote, H.W. (2000), “The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases”, Siam Review. 42(4), 599–653.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Wang, W., Tang, M., Yang, H., Do, Y., Lai, Y.C. & Lee, G.W. (2014), “Asymmetrically interacting spreading dynamics on complex layered networks”, Scientific Reports. 4(7502), 5097.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    H. Xia, Wang H, Xuan Z. (2011), Opinion dynamics: A multidisciplinary review and perspective on future research. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Sciences, 2(4), 72–91.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Xu, X., Li, X., Bian, Y. & Sun, Y. (2017), "Advance selling in the presence of product diffusion effect", Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. 26(1), 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Moreno, Y., Nekovee, M. & Pacheco, A.F. (2004), “Dynamics of rumor spreading in complex networks”, Physical Review E Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics. 69(6 Pt 2), 066130. QianGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Systems EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina
  2. 2.College of Shipping Economics and Management & Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport StudiesDalian Maritime UniversityDalianChina

Personalised recommendations