Project regularity: Development and evaluation of a new project characteristic
The ability to accurately characterize projects is essential to good project management. Therefore, a novel project characteristic is developed that reflects the value accrue within a project. This characteristic, called project regularity, is expressed in terms of the newly introduced regular/irregular-indicator RI. The widely accepted management system of earned value management (EVM) forms the basis for evaluation of the new characteristic. More concretely, the influence of project regularity on EVM forecasting accuracy is assessed, and is shown to be significant for both time and cost forecasting. Moreover, this effect appears to be stronger than that of the widely used characteristic of project seriality expressed by the serial/parallel-indicator SP. Therefore, project regularity could also be useful as an input parameter for project network generators. Furthermore, the introduction of project regularity can provide project managers with a more accurate indication of the time and cost forecasting accuracy that is to be expected for a certain project and, correspondingly, of how a project should be built up in order to obtain more reliable forecasts during project control.
KeywordsProject management earned value management time and cost forecasting empirical database Monte Carlo simulation project control system
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We acknowledge the support provided by the “Nationale Bank van België” (NBB) and by the “Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds” (BOF) for the project with contract number BOF12GOA021. Furthermore, we would also like to thank Gilles Bonne, Eveline Hoogstoel and Gilles Vandewiele for their efforts in developing PMConverter. And last but not least, we would like to express our gratitude towards the anonymous referees who helped to improve the quality of this paper through their constructive comments and valuable suggestions.
- Anbari, F. (2003). Earned value project management method and extensions. Project Management Journal, 34: 12–23.Google Scholar
- Christensen, D. (1998). The costs and benefits of the earned value management process. Acquisition Review Quarterly, Fall: 373–386.Google Scholar
- Egnot, J. (2011). Earned progress management-a unified theory of earned value & earned schedule concepts. The Measurable News, Issue 4: 8–24.Google Scholar
- Fleming, Q. & Koppelman, J. (2010). Earned Value Project Management (4th ed). Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Henderson, K. (2007). Earned schedule: a breakthrough extension to earned value management. In: PMI Asia Pacific Global Congress Proceedings, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Jacob, D. & Kane, M. (2004). Forecasting schedule completion using earned value metrics revisited. The Measurable News, Summer: 1, 11–17.Google Scholar
- Lipke, W. (2003). Schedule is different. The Measurable News, Summer: 31–34.Google Scholar
- Marshall, R. (2007). The contribution of earned value management to project success on contracted efforts. Journal of Contract Management, Summer: 21–33.Google Scholar
- Meredith, J. & Mantel, S. (2003). Project Management: A Managerial Approach (5th ed.). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- PMI (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (3rd ed). Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Rujirayanyong, T. (2009). A comparison of three completion date predicting methods for construction projects. Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 6: 305–318.Google Scholar
- Schwindt, C. (1995). A new problem generator for different resource-constrained project scheduling problems with minimal and maximal time lags. WIOR-Report-449. Institut für Wirtschaftstheorie und Operations Research, University of Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
- Van De Velde, R. (2007). Time is up: assessing schedule performance with earned value. PM World Today, 9: 1–10.Google Scholar