Optimal policy with a total order quantity commitment contract in the presence of a spot market
- First Online:
- 238 Downloads
In this paper, the optimal policy is considered when the buyer faces two supply sources: one is the contract supplier from which the buyer orders over a specific contract period (say, a year) at a pre-agreed price, and the other is the spot market. However, when ordering from the contract supplier, the buyer must fulfill a pre-determined total order quantity, or the so-called definite total order quantity commitment, over the whole contract period. In other words, the commitment secures the buyer a fixed price but obliges him/her a total order quantity over the contract period. Although the spot market gives the buyer more flexibility in terms of order quantities, its prices are volatile. Such a combination of contract and spot procurements is often observed in practice. Within the contract period, there are multiple sub-periods, during each of which the buyer reviews the inventory, issues an individual order, and uses the on-hand inventory to meet the random demand. Thus, in each (ordering) period, the buyer will weigh between the current known spot price (by procuring from the spot market) and a lower future price (by waiting while consuming the remaining commitment). An optimal dual ordering policy is characterized for each period, depending on the on-hand inventory level, the spot price, and the remaining commitment quantity. The optimal policy in each period is also shown to be independent of the contract price. Through a numerical study, the inventory cost is demonstrated to be (1) insensitive to the contract price when the total commitment quantity is lower than the total expected demand over the contract period and (2) non-increasing in the variability of spot prices.
KeywordsTotal ordering quantity commitment (TOQC) spot market procurement policy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ann, T.H. & Maguire, F. (2005). BHP to decide on $2.3 billion ore expansion plans. Bloomberg News, June 2nd, 2005Google Scholar
- Anupindi, R. & Bassok, Y. (1998). Supply contracts with quantity commitments and stochastic demands. In: Tayur, S., Ganeshan, R., Magazine, M. (eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Arnold, J., Minner, S. & Eidam, B. (2006). Raw material procurement with fluctuating prices. Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
- Bassok, Y. & Schuster, D.B. (1995). Supply contract with early termination. In: INFORMS New Orleans Conference, October 29–November 1, 1995Google Scholar
- Bassok, Y. & Anupindi, R. (1997). Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment. IIE Transactions, 29: 373–381Google Scholar
- Feng, Q. & Sethi, S. (2008). Procurement flexibility under price uncertainty. McCombs Research Paper Series No. IROM-04-09Google Scholar
- Guzel, A. (2004). Optimal commodity procurement under stochastic prices. Technology, 7: 29–39Google Scholar
- Hannon, D. (2005). Why natrual gas prices remain so volatile. Purchasing, January 13th, 2005. Available via DIALOG. http://www.purchasing.com
- Hill, L. (2010). Canada’s Canpotex sells potash to India at $370/t. Miningweekly.com, February 19th, 2010
- HKTDC. (2007). Cost escalation and trends for export price increase — a look at the rising production costs in the PRD. Available via DAILOG. http://info.hktdc.com/econforum/tdc/tdc070901.htm.
- Inderfurth, K. & Kelle, P. (2008). Capacity reservation under spot market price uncertainty. Working paperGoogle Scholar
- Porteus, E.L. (2002). Foundations of Stochastic Inventory Theory. Stanford University Press. CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- Tally Metal Sales Inc. (2010). Available via DIALOG. http://www.tally-metal.com/. Cited on June 2nd, 2010
- Yi, J. & Scheller-Wolf, A. (2003). Dual sourcing from a regular supplier and a spot market. Working paperGoogle Scholar