Connecting informal networks to management of tacit knowledge

  • Kun Nie
  • Shufang Lin
  • Tieju Ma
  • Yoshiteru Nakamori
Article

Abstract

The relationship between tacit knowledge and informal networks has not been fully explored. Tacit knowledge cannot be well managed directly, because it is deeply embedded in individual actions and experiences. This study proposes an approach to managing informal networks as a new middle way to facilitate the sharing and transferring of tacit knowledge, owing to the fact that tacit knowledge is mostly shared and transferred through informal networks. To support the idea of the approach, an empirical case study of applying the approach to management of a large scientific project is also included. Our findings suggest that informal networks play essential roles for management of tacit knowledge, and thus good management of informal networks can lead to efficient sharing and transferring of tacit knowledge.

Keywords

Informal networks tacit knowledge case study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Adner, R. & Helfat, C.E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 1011–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Aldrich, H., Elam, A. & Reese, P.R. (1997). Strong ties, weak ties and strangers: do women business owners differ from men in their use of networking to obtain assistance? In: Birley, S. & MacMillan, I.C. (eds.), Entrepreneurship in a Global Context, pp. 1–25. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Baalen, P., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. & Heck, E. (2005). Knowledge sharing in an emerging network of practice: the role of a knowledge portal. European Management Journal, 23(3): 300–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Baker, C.H. (1872). Concerning certain details of the Bessemer process. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 94(3): 197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bhagat, R.S., Kedia, B.L., Harveston, P.D. & Triandis, H.C. (2002). Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 204–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. & Freeman, L.G. (1999). UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Brockmann, E.N. & Anthony, W.P. (2002). Tacit knowledge and strategic decision making. Group & Organization Management, 27(4): 436–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Bryant, S.E. (2005) The impact of peer mentoring on organizational knowledge creation and sharing: an empirical study in a software firm. Group & Organization Management, 30(3): 319–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Burt, R.S. (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Chan, K. & Liebowitz, J. (2006). The synergy of social network analysis and knowledge mapping: a case study. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(1): 19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Cole, M.S., Schaninger Jr., W.S. & Harris, S.G. (2002). The workplace social exchange network: a multilevel, conceptual examination. Group & Organization Management, 27(1): 142–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Collins, H. (1974). The TEA set: tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies, 4(2): 165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Cross, R., Nohria, N. & Parker, A. (2002). Six myths about informal networks-and how to overcome them. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3): 67–75Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Cross, R. & Parker, A. (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Cross, R., Parker, A. & Borgatti, S.P. (2002). Making invisible work visible: using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2): 25–46Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Cross, R., Parker, A., Prusak, L. & Borgatti, S.P. (2001). Knowing what we know: supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2): 100–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Cross, R. & Prusak, L. (2002). The people who make organizations go or stop. Harvard Business Review, 6: 105–112Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    De Jong, J.A. (1996). Research into on-the-job training: a state of the art. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(5): 449–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Dyer, J.H. & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 660–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Erden, Z., Krogh, G.V. & Nonaka, I. (2008). The quality of group tacit knowledge. Journal of Strategic Information Systems,17: 4–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Foos, T., Schum, G. & Rothenberg, S. (2006). Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1): 6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C.A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4): 603–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1): 82–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Kikoski, C. & Kikoski, J. (2004). The Inquiring Organization. Praeger publisher, WestportGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24: 625–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Lane, P.J. & LuBatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33: 5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge-Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Polanyi, M. & Grene, M. (1969). Knowing and Being. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Reagans, R. & Zuckerman, E.W. (2001) Network, diversity, and performance: the social capital of R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4): 501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Stephenson, K. (2005). Trafficking in trust: the art and science of human knowledge networks. In: Coughlin, L., Wingard, E. & Hollihan, K. (eds.), Enlightened Power: How Women Are Transforming the Practice of Leadership, pp. 243–264. Jossey-Bass Publisher, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Terry, P. (1994). CPA firms try to stop revolving door for women. Journal of Accountancy, July: 8–12Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 925–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Wenger, E. (1998). Community of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization, 7(2): 225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Wenger, E. & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of Practice: the Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review. January–February: 139–145Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Wuchty, S., Jones, B. & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316: 1036–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Yang, S.J.H. & Chen, I.Y.L. (2008). A social network-based system for supporting interactive collaboration in knowledge sharing over peer-to-peer network. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66: 36–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Zack, M. (2000). Researching organizational systems using social network analysis. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Science, 1–7, Maui, Hawaii, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Zander, U. & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1): 76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kun Nie
    • 1
  • Shufang Lin
    • 2
  • Tieju Ma
    • 3
    • 4
  • Yoshiteru Nakamori
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationZhejiang Gongshang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationYuanpei UniversityYuanpeiTaiwan
  3. 3.School of BusinessEast China University of Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina
  4. 4.Transition to New TechnologyInternational Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria
  5. 5.Graduate School of Knowledge ScienceJapan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyIshikawaJapan

Personalised recommendations