Nuclear non-proliferation and international security: A drama theoretic approach

Article
First Online:
  • 149 Downloads

Abstract

While game theoretic tools have been widely applied to nuclear proliferation and disarmament issues, traditional decision analysis assumes that decision makers, options, and preferences are fixed. A drama theoretic approach is used to overcome these limiting assumptions: Drama Theory (DT) II allows global leaders and national security policy makers to engage in a rational-emotional process of re-defining international security negotiations (and their “positions” in them) until agreement on a satisfactory nuclear non-proliferation resolution is reached. The 2009 nuclear energy negotiations between Iran and world powers are modeled with DT II and the Confrontation ManagerTM Decision Support System. By adjusting strategy and deriving transformative security policy, it is shown how international security can be achieved by promoting nuclear non-proliferation and resolving strategic conflict.

Keywords

Nuclear non-proliferation strategic conflict drama theory international security 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. [1]
    Al-jassani, A. (2006). Will the Iranian nuclear program threaten Arab national security? Attatdid al-Arabi, July 7, 2006Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    AFP. (2009). US urges Tehran to accept nuclear offer. Associated Foreign Press, November 22, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i3jjGT23wDptRUfgzMKZtCdrB_oA
  3. [3]
    AP. (2009). Israeli navy seizes Lebanon-bound ship allegedly carrying arms to Hezbollah. Associated Press, November 4, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,571548,00.html
  4. [4]
    Almaz Scientific Industrial Corporation. (2006). Favorit S-300 PMU2 surface-to-air missile system. Available via DIALOG. http://www.raspletin.ru/eng/lists/favorit.html
  5. [5]
    Binmore, K. (2008). Rational Decisions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Borger, J. (2009). Iran tested advanced nuclear warhead design — secret report. Guardian, November 5, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/05/iran-tested-nuclear-warhead-design
  7. [7]
    Broad, W.J. & Sanger, D.E. (2009). Report says Iran has data to make a nuclear bomb. New York Times, October 9, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/world/middleeast/04nuke.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rss
  8. [8]
    Bryant, J.W. (1993). The Six Dilemmas of Collaboration. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    CNN. (2009). IAEA report raises concerns about Iranian nuclear facilities. November 16, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/11/16/iran.iaea.nuclear.facility/index.html
  10. [10]
    Chiacu, D. & Barbara, P. (2008). Top US admiral says strike on Iran means turmoil. Reuters, July 20, 2008. Available via DIALOG. http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N20332857.htm
  11. [11]
    Daragahi, B. (2009). Iran’s Ahmadinejad calls for nuclear cooperation. Los Angeles Times November 12, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran-ahmadinejad12-2009nov12,0,2523781.story
  12. [12]
    Deshmukh, J. (2009). Iran’s second enrichment plant “not secret”. Nuclear Chief, AFP, September 25, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gGrZsm6sT1joGZBSD5ejGwaa7WHQ
  13. [13]
    FNA. (2009). Ahmadinejad: Iran ready for nuclear cooperation. Farsa News Agency, October 29, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8808070676
  14. [14]
    Hafezi, P. (2009). Iran’s Ahmadinejad seen backing nuclear deal. Reuters. Available via DIALOG. http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Iran/idUSTRE5AG53620091117
  15. [15]
    Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality: Games, Metagames and Political Behavior. MIT Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Howard, N. (1994). Drama theory and its relation to game theory. Part 2: formal model of the resolution process. Group Decision and Negotiation, 3: 207–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Howard N. (1998). n-Person “Soft” games. Journal of Operational Research Society, 49: 144–150MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    IRNA. (2006). Iran to continue its peaceful nuclear activities: Majlis speaker. Islamic Republic News Agency, October 11, 2006. Available via DIALOG. http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iran/2006/iran-061011-irna01.htm
  19. [19]
    ISIS. (2009). Excerpts from internal IAEA document on alleged Iranian nuclear weaponization. Institute for Science and International Security, October 2, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.isis-online.org/publications/iran/IAEA_info_3October2009.pdf
  20. [20]
    Jerusalem Post. (2009). Medvedev, Obama May talk sanctions. November 14, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1258027286395&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
  21. [21]
    Kandil, H. (2006). Iran nuclear plans may be environmental hazard, UAE says. May 23, 2006. Available via DIALOG. http://www.enn.com/top_stories/article/4312
  22. [22]
    Karon, T. (2009). Iran: can the US take “yes but” for an answer? Time Magazine, October 8, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1929037,00.html
  23. [23]
    Khaitous, T. (2009). Arab reactions to a nuclear-armed Iran. Policy Focus #94, The Washington Institute for Near East PolicyGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Lazaroff, T. & Hoffman, G. (2009). State department: US opposes unilateral moves by PA. Jerusalem Post, November 16, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1258027304563&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
  25. [25]
    Levitt, M. & Jacobson, M. (2009). The world can’t trust Iran. The Guardian, September 26, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC06.php?CID=1348
  26. [26]
    Mahdi, W. (2009). Saudi Arabia discusses nuclear waste disposal. The National, October 30, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.arabenvironment.net/archive/2009/10/962248.html
  27. [27]
    Mason, J. (2009). Iran’s nuclear plans a sign of isolation — White House. Reuters, November 29, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSN2952784420091129
  28. [28]
    NIE. (2007). Iran: nuclear intentions and capabilities. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, National Intelligence Council, November, 2007. Available via DIALOG. http://www.dni.gov/press_releases/20071203_release.pdf
  29. [29]
    Parker, R.W. (2009). Is a deal with Iran finally taking place? Huffington Post, November 18, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-parker/is-a-deal-with-iran-final_b_362038.html
  30. [30]
    Reuters. (2009). Iran MP: we could produce our own system. November 15, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1128252.html
  31. [31]
    Rittel, H. & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4: 155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Sanger, D.E. (2009). US denied Israeli bid for bunker-buster bombs. New York Times, January 11, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2009/01/11/us_denied_israeli_bid_for_bunker_buster_bombs/
  33. [33]
    Sanger, D.E., Erlanger, S. & Worth, R.F. (2009). Tehran rejects nuclear accord, officials report. October 29, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/30/world/middleeast/30nuke.html
  34. [34]
    Sepehri, V. (2007). Iran: environment takes a back seat to development plans. August 27, 2007. Available via DIALOG. http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1078370.html
  35. [35]
    Stewart, M. (2009). Gates lays out non-military options to deal with Iran. CNN.com, September 27, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/27/gates-lays-out-non-military-options-to-deal-with-iran/
  36. [36]
    Tapper, J.T. (2009). Heading to Oslo in weeks, President Obama faces tough days on the diplomatic front ABC News. Available via DIALOG. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/11/heading-to-oslo-in-weeks-president-obama-faces-tough-days-on-the-diplomatic-front.html
  37. [37]
    Tehran Times. (2009). Iran will only deliver its Uranium after receiving nuclear fuel. November 17, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=208104
  38. [38]
    Time. (2009). Iran’s nuke standoff and Ahmadinejad’s woes. November 16, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1939645,00.html?xid=rss-topstories
  39. [39]
    Tobin, M. (2009). “The S-300: why so important? Live Shots, Fox News, September 12, 2009. Available via DIALOG. http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/09/12/the-s-300-why-so-important/

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wilder School of Government and Public AffairsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations