Knowledge process analysis: Framework and experience

Article

Abstract

We present a step-by-step approach for constructing a framework for knowledge process analysis (KPA). We intend to apply this framework to the analysis of own research projects in an exploratory way and elaborate it through the accumulation of case studies. This study is based on a methodology consisting of knowledge process modeling, primitives synthesis, and reflective verification. We describe details of the methodology and present the results of case studies: a novel methodology, a practical work guide, and a tool for KPA; insights for improving future research projects and education; and the integration of existing knowledge creation theories.

Keywords

Knowledge process analysis knowledge process modeling primitives synthesis reflective verification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Busch, P.A., Richards, D. & Dampney, C.N.G. (2001). Visual mapping of articulable tacit knowledge. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Sydney, 9: 37–47Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Coghlan, D. & Brannick, T. (2005). Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. SAGE PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Despres, C. & Chauvel, D. (2000). A thematic analysis of the thinking in knowledge management. In: Despres, C., Chauval, D. (eds.), Knowledge Horizons. The Present and the Promise of Knowledge Management, pp. 55–86. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Finke, R., Ward, T. & Smith, S. (1992). Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51 (4): 327–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ichikawa, K. (1970). The Science of Creativity. Japan Braodcast Publishing, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kawakita, J. (1975). The KJ Method — A Scientific Approach to Problem Solving. Kawakita Research Institute, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Li, M., & Gao, F. (2003). Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: a critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 (4): 6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Meyer, B. & Spiekermann, S. (2006). SkillMap: dynamic visualization of shared organizational context. In: Lehner, F., Noesekabel, H., Kleinshchmidt (eds.), Proceedings of Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2006 (WI’06), pp. 528–540. Universität PassauGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Meyer, B. & Sugiyama, K. (2007). The concept of knowledge in KM: a dimensional model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11 (1): 17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford Univ. Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Konno, N. (2000). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1: 2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Polanyi, M. (1983). The Tacit Dimension. GloucesterGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Redmond, B. (2004). Reflection in Action. Ashgate publishingGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Roberts, R.M. (1989). Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Simonton, D.K. (2004). Creativity in Science: Change, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Sugiyama, K. (2007). Post-analysis of knowledge creation processes in small research projects. Int. J. Information Technology and Decision Making, 6 (3): 541–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Sugiyama, K., Hong, S. & Maeda, A. (2004). The puzzle layout problem. In: Liotta, G. (eds.), Proceedings of GD 2003 — LNCS 2912, 500–501. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sugiyama, K. & Misue, K. (1990). “Good” graphic interfaces for “good” idea organizers. In: Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’ 90), 521–526, August 1990, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Sugiyama, K., Nagata, A. & Shimojima, A. (2002). Knowledge Science. Kinokuniya, Tokyo (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Sugiyama, K. Osawa, R. & Hong, S. (2005). Puzzle generators and symmetric puzzle layout. In: Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualization 2005 (APVIS2005), SydneyGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Zins, C. (2006). Redefining information science: from “information science” to “knowledge science”. Journal of Documentation, 62 (4): 447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Knowledge ScienceJapan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyIshikawaJapan

Personalised recommendations