Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 257–283 | Cite as

On services research and education

Article

Abstract

The importance of the services sector can not be overstated; it employs 82.1 percent of the U. S. workforce and 69 percent of graduates from an example technological university. Yet, university research and education have not followed suit. Clearly, services research and education deserve our critical attention and support since services — and services innovation — serve as an indispensable engine for global economic growth. The theme of this paper is that we can and should build services research and education on what has occurred in manufacturing research (especially in regard to customization and intellectual property) and education; indeed, services and manufactured goods become indistinguishable as they are jointly co-produced in real-time. Fortunately, inasmuch as manufacturing concepts, methodologies and technologies have been developed and refined over a long period of time (i.e., since the 1800s), the complementary set of concepts, methodologies and technologies for services are more obvious. However, while new technologies (e.g., the Internet) and globalization trends have served to enable, if not facilitate, services innovation, the same technologies (e.g., the Internet) and 21st Century realities (e.g., terrorism) are making services innovation a far more complex problem and, in fact, may be undermining previous innovations in both services and manufacturing. Finally, there is a need to define a “knowledge-adjusted” GDP metric that can more adequately measure the growing knowledge economy, one driven by intangible ideas and services innovation.

Keywords

Services manufacturing customization innovation education intellectual property 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Baumol, W.J., Batey-Blackman, S.A. & Wolff, E.N. (1989). Productivity and American Leadership: the Long View. Cambridge, MA: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Berg, D., Tien, J. M. & Wallace, W. A. (2001). Guest editorial: technology management in the service industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management: Special Cluster, 148(3): 330–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Berg, D. & Einspruch, N.G. (2004). Data surface mining (DSM): application to economic sector analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, 453–454, Beijing, China, 2004Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Berg, D. & Einspruch, N.G. (2006a). Corporate reputation, technology and the economic sectors. Proceedings of the International Association for the Management of Technology, Beijing, China, May 22–26, 2006Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Berg, D. & Einspruch, N.G. (2006b). Analyzing corporate innovation using the data surface mining technique. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, June 21–23, 2006bGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cohen, S. & Zysman, J. (1987). Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of the Post-Industrial Economy. London: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Corrado, C., Hulten, C. & Sichel, D. (2005). Intangible Capital and Economic Growth. Baltimore, MD: Federal Reserve BoardGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Edward, M. & Hallowell, E.M. (2006). CrazyBusy: Overstretched, Overbooked, and about to Snap! Strategies for Coping in a World Gone ADD. New York, NY: Ballantine BooksGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Friedman, T.L. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & GirouxGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fitzsimmons, J.A. & Fitzsimmons, M.J. (2006). Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Information Technology. Fifth Edition, New York, NY: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Flower, J. (2006). Five-star hospitals. Strategy and Business, 42: 67–77, SpringGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Gershenfeld, N.A. (2005). FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop — From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Boston, MA: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, 438(7070): 900–901, December 15, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2005). Enhancing the Performance of the Service Sector: Promoting Innovation in Services. Paris, France: OECD PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. & Berry, L.L. (1998). Servqual: a multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1): 12–40Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Pine II, B.J. & Gilmore J.H. (1997). The four faces of mass customization. Harvard Business Review, 75(1): 91–101Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Pine II, B.J. & Gilmore, J.H. (1999). The Experience Economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Roush, W. (2006). Inside the spyware scandal. Technology Review, May/June: 49–57Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sheffi, Y. (2005). The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Surowiecki, J. (2005). Technology and happiness. Technology Review, January: 72–76Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Tien, J.M. (1986). On automated correctional data systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 10(3/4): 157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Tien, J.M. (2000). Individual-centered education: an any one, any time, any where approach to engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Special Issue on Systems Engineering Education, 30(2): 213–218MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Tien, J.M. (2003). Towards a decision informatics paradigm: A real-time, information-based approach to decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Special Issue, Part C, 33(1): 102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Tien, J.M. (2005). Viewing urban disruptions from a decision informatics perspective. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(3): 257–288MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Tien, J.M. (September, 2006). Services innovation: decision attributes, innovation enablers, and innovation drivers. In: Cheng Hsu, (eds.), Service Enterprise Integration: An Enterprise System Engineering Perspective, Novell, MA: Springer, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Tien, J.M. & Berg, D. (1995). Systems engineering in the growing service economy. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 25(5): 321–326Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Tien, J.M. and Berg, D. (2003). A case for service systems engineering. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 12(1): 13–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Tien, J.M. & Cahn, M.F. (1981). An Evaluation of the Wilmington Management of Demand Program. Washington, DC: National Institute of JusticeGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Tien, J.M., Krishnamurthy, A. & Yasar, A. (2004). Towards real-time customized management of supply and demand chains. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(3): 257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    U. S. Congress (2005). National Innovation Act. Washington, DC: U. S. Congress S2109/HR4654Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Wright, B.C. (2002). Business Method Patents: Are There Any Limits. Chicago, IL: The John Marshall Law SchoolGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Yasar, A. (2005). Real-time and simultaneous management of supply and demand chains. Dissertation. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Yasar, A. & Tien, J.M. (2003). A robust dynamic pricing approach that tracks the customer’s imputed valuation. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybemetics, Washington, DC, 2003Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Systems Engineering Society of China & Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Decision Sciences and Engineering SystemRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations