Advertisement

Potentiation of the first and second phases of the M wave after maximal voluntary contractions in the biceps brachii muscle

  • Javier Rodriguez-FalcesEmail author
  • Taian Vieira
  • Nicolas Place
  • Alberto Botter
Original Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The study was undertaken to examine separately the potentiation of the first and second phases of the M wave in biceps brachii after conditioning maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of different durations. M waves were evoked in the biceps brachii muscle before and after isometric MVCs of 1, 3, 6, 10, 30, and 60 s. The amplitude, duration, and area of the first and second phases of monopolar M waves were measured during the 10-min period following each contraction. Our results indicated that the amplitude and area of the M-wave first phase increased after MVCs of long (≥ 30 s) duration (P < 0.05), while it decreased after MVCs of short (≤ 10 s) duration (P < 0.05). The enlargement after the long MVCs persisted for 5 min, whereas the depression after the short contractions lasted only for 15 s. The amplitude of the second phase increased immediately (1 s) after all MVCs tested (P < 0.05), regardless of their duration, and then returned rapidly (10 s) to control levels. Unexpectedly, the amplitude of the second phase decreased below control values between 15 s and 1 min after the MVCs lasting ≥ 6 s (P < 0.05). Our results reinforce the idea that the presence of fatigue is a necessary condition to induce an enlargement of the M-wave first phase and that this enlargement would be greater (and occur sooner) in muscles with a predominance of type II fibers (quadriceps and biceps brachii) compared to type-I predominant muscles (tibialis anterior). The unique findings observed for the M-wave second phase indicate that changes in this phase are highly muscle dependent.

Graphical abstract

Left panel—Representative examples of M waves recorded in one participant before (control) and at various times after conditioning maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of short (a1) and long (a2) duration. Left panel—Time course of recovery of the amplitude of the first (b1) and second (b2) phases of the M wave after conditioning MVCs of different durations.

Keywords

M wave Brachial plexus stimulation Electromyography Biceps brachii Isometric contraction M-wave potentiation 

Abbreviations

AmpliFIRST

Amplitude of the first phase of the M wave

AmpliSECOND

Amplitude of the second phase of the M wave

AmpliPP

Amplitude resulting from the sum of AmpliFIRST and AmpliSECOND

AreaFIRST

Area of the first phase of the M wave

AreaSECOND

Area of the second phase of the M wave

AreaTOTAL

Area resulting from the sum of AreaFIRST and AreaSECOND

DurFIRST

Duration of the first phase of the M wave

DurSECOND

Duration of the second phase of the M wave

DurPP

Time interval between the first and second peaks of the M wave

EMG

Electromyography

MVC

Maximal voluntary contraction

M wave

Compound muscle action potential

RF

Rectus femoris

SD

Standard deviation

SE

Standard error of the mean

VL

Vastus lateralis

VM

Vastus medialis

Notes

Grants

This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO), under the TEC2014-58947-R project.

Author contributions

J.R-F, A. B, T. V, and N. P designed the experimental study; J.R-F, A. B, and T. V performed the experiments; J.R-F and A. B analyzed the data; J.R-F, A. B, T. V, and N. P interpreted the results of the experiments; J.R-F drafted the manuscript; J.R-F, A. B, T. V, and N. P edited and revised the manuscript; J.R-F, A. B, T. V, and N. P approved the final version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Approval for the project was obtained from the local Ethics Committee, and all procedures used in this study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Arabadzhiev TI, Dimitrov GV, Chakarov VE, Dimitrov AG, Dimitrova NA (2008) Effects of changes in intracellular action potential on potentials recorded by single-fiber, macro, and belly-tendon electrodes. Muscle Nerve 37:700–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Botter A, Vieira TM (2017) Optimization of surface electrodes location for H-reflex recordings in soleus muscle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 34:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cupido CM, Galea V, McComas AJ (1996) Potentiation and depression of the M wave in human biceps brachii. J Physiol 491(2):541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Souza LML, Cabral HV, de Oliveira LF, Vieira TM (2018) Motor units in vastus lateralis and in different vastus medialis regions show different firing properties during low-level, isometric knee extension contraction. Hum Mov Sci 58:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dimitrova NA, Dimitrov GV (2002) Amplitude-related characteristics of motor unit and M-wave potentials during fatigue. A simulation study using literature data on intracellular potential changes found in vitro. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimitrova NA, Hogrel JY, Arabadzhiev TI, Dimitrov GV (2005) Estimate of M-wave changes in human biceps brachii during continuous stimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 15(4):341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dimitrova NA, Dimitrov GV (2003) Interpretation of EMG changes with fatigue: facts, pitfalls, and fallacies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13(1):13–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farina D, Fosci M, Merletti R (2002) Motor unit recruitment strategies investigated by surface EMG variables. J Appl Physiol 92(1):235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuglevand AJ, Zackowski KM, Huey KA, Enoka RM (1993) Impairment of neuromuscular propagation during human fatiguing contractions at submaximal forces. J Physiol 460:549–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fowles JR, Sale DG, MacDougall JD (2000) Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantarflexors. J Appl Physiol 89:1179–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gydikov A, Kosarov D (1972) Volume conduction of the potentials from separate motor units in human muscle. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 12(2):127–147Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamada T, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA (2000) Postactivation potentiation, fiber type, and twitch contraction time in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol 88:2131–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hanson J, Persson A (1971) Changes in the action potential and contraction of isolated frog muscle after repetitive stimulation. Acta Physiol Scand 81:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanson J (1974) Effects of repetitive stimulation on membrane potentials and twitch in human and rat intercostal muscle fibers. Acta Physiol Scand 92:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hauraix H, Fouré A, Dorel S, Cornu C, Nordez A (2015) Muscle and tendon stiffness assessment using the alpha method and ultrafast ultrasound. Eur J Appl Physiol 115(7):1393–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hauraix H, Nordez A, Guilhem G, Rabita G, Dorel S (2015) In vivo maximal fascicle-shortening velocity during plantar flexion in humans. J Appl Physiol 119(11):1262–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hicks A, McComas AJ (1989) Increased sodium pump activity following repetitive stimulation of rat soleus muscles. J Physiol 414:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hicks A, Fenton J, Garner S, McComas AJ (1989) M wave potentiation during and after muscle activity. J Appl Physiol 66:2606–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jubeau M, Gondin J, Martin A, Van Hoecke J, Maffiuletti NA (2010) Differences in twitch potentiation between voluntary and stimulated quadriceps contractions of equal intensity. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T (2001) Influences of repetitive muscle contractions with different modes on tendon elasticity in vivo. J Appl Physiol 91:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T (2002) Effects of transient muscle contractions and stretching on the tendon structures in vivo. Acta Physiol Scand 175(2):157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lännergren J, Westerblad H (1987) Action potential fatigue in single skeletal muscle fibres of Xenopus. Acta Physiol Scand 129:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lateva ZC, McGill KC, Burgar CG (1996) Anatomical and electrophysiological determinants of the human thenar compound muscle action potential. Muscle Nerve 19(11):1457–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lüttgau HC (1965) The effect of metabolic inhibitors on the fatigue of the action potential in single muscle fibres. J Physiol Lond 178:45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Sargeant AJ (2002) Repeated contractions alter the geometry of human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 93:2089–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maganaris CN (2003) Tendon conditioning: artefact or property? Proc Biol Sci Suppl 1:S39–S42Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McComas AJ, Galea V, Einhorn RW (1994) Pseudofacilitation: a misleading term. Muscle Nerve 17(6):599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mesin L, Merletti R, Vieira TM (2011) Insights gained into the interpretation of surface electromyograms from the gastrocnemius muscles: a simulation study. J Biomech 44(6):1096–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Metzger JM, Fitts RH (1986) Fatigue from high- and low frequency muscle stimulation: role of sarcolemma action potentials. Exp Neurol 93:320–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pappas GP, Asakawa DS, Delp SL, Zajac FE, Drace JE (2002) Nonuniform shortening in the biceps brachii during elbow flexion. J Appl Physiol 92(6):2381–2389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parmiggiani F, Stein RB (1981) Nonlinear summation of contractions in cat muscles. II. Later facilitation and stiffness changes. J Gen Physiol 78(3):295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rainoldi A, Melchiorri G, Caruso I (2004) A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles. J Neurosci Methods 134(1):37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rodriguez-Falces J, Maffiuletti NA, Place N (2013) Twitch and M-wave potentiation induced by intermittent maximal voluntary quadriceps contractions: differences between direct quadriceps and femoral nerve stimulation. Muscle Nerve 48(6):920–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rodriguez-Falces J, Place N (2014) Effects of muscle fibre shortening on the characteristics of surface motor unit potentials. Med Biol Eng Comput 52:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rodriguez-Falces J, Duchateau J, Muraoka Y, Baudry S (2015) M-wave potentiation after voluntary contractions of different durations and intensities in the tibialis anterior. J Appl Physiol 118:953–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rodriguez-Falces J, Place N (2016) Differences in the recruitment curves obtained with monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations in the quadriceps femoris. Muscle Nerve 54(1):118–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rodriguez-Falces J, Place N (2017) New insights into the potentiation of the first and second phases of the M-wave after voluntary contractions in the quadriceps muscle. Muscle Nerve 55(1):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rodriguez-Falces J, Place N (2018) Determinants, analysis and interpretation of the muscle compound action potential (M wave) in humans: implications for the study of muscle fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol 118(3):501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith JL, Martin PG, Gandevia SC, Taylor JL (2007) Sustained contraction at very low forces produces prominent supraspinal fatigue in human elbow flexor muscles. J Appl Physiol 103(2):560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Toia F, D'Arpa S, Brenner E, Melloni C, Moschella F, Cordova A (2015) Segmental anatomy of the vastus lateralis: guidelines for muscle-sparing flap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg 135(1):185e–198eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vieira TM, Botter A, Minetto MA, Hodson-Tole EF (2015) Spatial variation of compound muscle action potentials across human gastrocnemius medialis. J Neurophysiol 114(3):1617–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vinti M, Gracies JM, Gazzoni M, Vieira T (2018) Localised sampling of myoelectric activity may provide biased estimates of cocontraction for gastrocnemius though not for soleus and tibialis anterior muscles. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 38:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Rodriguez-Falces
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Taian Vieira
    • 3
  • Nicolas Place
    • 4
  • Alberto Botter
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronical EngineeringPublic University of NavarraPamplonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronical EngineeringUniversidad Pública de Navarra D.I.E.EPamplonaSpain
  3. 3.Laboratory for Engineering of the Neuromuscular System (LISiN), Department of Electronics and TelecommunicationPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly
  4. 4.Institute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology MedicineUniversity of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations