Aortic root sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a shape model parameterisation
- 44 Downloads
During a transcatheter aortic valve implantation, an axisymmetric implant is placed in an irregularly shaped aortic root. Implanting an incorrect size can cause complications such as leakage of blood alongside or through the implant. The aim of this study was to construct a method that determines the optimal size of the implant based on the three-dimensional shape of the aortic root. Based on the pre-interventional computed tomography scan of 89 patients, a statistical shape model of their aortic root was constructed. The weights associated with the principal components and the volume of calcification in the aortic valve were used as parameters in a classification algorithm. The classification algorithm was trained using the patients with no or mild leakage after their intervention. Subsequently, the algorithms were applied to the patients with moderate to severe leakage. Cross validation showed that a random forest classifier assigned the same size in 65 ± 7% of the training cases, while 57 ± 8% of the patients with moderate to severe leakage were assigned a different size. This initial study showed that this semi-automatic method has the potential to correctly assign an implant size. Further research is required to assess whether the different size implants would improve the outcome of those patients.
KeywordsStatistical shape modelling Aortic root sizing Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
This work was supported in part by a PhD grant (120198) from the agency for innovation through science and technology (IWT) of the Flemish government.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Prof. Dr. Johan Bosmans and Prof. Dr. Peter de Jaegere are part-time clinical proctor for Medtronic. Prof. Dr. ir. Jos Vander Sloten is a member of the Board of Directors of Materialise N.V. and a shareholder. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 2.Allen J, Zacur E, Dall’Armellina E, Lamata P, Grau V (2016) Myocardial infarction detection from left ventricular shapes using a random forest. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 180–189Google Scholar
- 5.Bosmans B, Collas V, Verhoelst E, Paelinck B, Vander Sloten J, Bosmans J (2016) Morphological characteristics and calcification of the native aortic valve and the relation to significant aortic regurgitation post CoreValve TAVI. Journal of Heart Valve DiseaseGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bruse JL, Mcleod K, Biglino G, Ntsinjana HN, Capelli C, Hsia TY, Sermesant M, Pennec X, Taylor AM, Schievano S, Hearts C (2016) A statistical shape modelling framework to extract 3D shape biomarkers from medical imaging data : assessing arch morphology of repaired coarctation of the aorta. BMC Med Imaging 16(1):40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Buzzatti N, Maisano F, Latib A, Cioni M, Taramasso M, Mussardo M, Colombo A, Alfieri O (2013) Computed tomography-based evaluation of aortic annulus, prosthesis size and impact on early residual aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 43(1):43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Détaint D, Lepage L, Himbert D, Brochet E, Messika-Zeitoun D, Iung B, Vahanian A (2009) Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: implantation impact of device and annulus discongruence. JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions 2(9):821–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefévre T, Hovasse T, Morice MC, Chevalier B, Romano M, Garot P, Mylotte D, Farge A, Donzeau-Gouge P, Cormier B (2012) Impact of CT-guided valve sizing on post-procedural aortic regurgitation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention : Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology 8 (5):546–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, Calhoon JH, Carabello BA, Desai MY, Edwards FH, Francis GS, Gardner TJ, Kappetein AP, Linderbaum JA, Mukherjee C, Mukherjee D, Otto CM, Ruiz CE, Sacco RL, Smith D, Thomas JD (2012) 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(13):1200–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, Furugen A, Shiota T, Friede G, Makhija R, Doctor N, Leon MB, Makkar RR (2012) Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(14):1275–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Makkar RR, Fontana GP, Dewey TM, Thourani VH, Pichard AD, Fischbein M, Szeto WY, Lim S, Greason KL, Teirstein PS, Malaisrie SC, Douglas PS, Hahn RT, Whisenant B, Zajarias A, Wang D, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Leon MB (2012) Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 366 (18):1686–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lekadir K, Albà X, Pereañez M, Frangi AF (2016) Statistical shape modeling using partial least squares: application to the assessment of myocardial infarction. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 130–139Google Scholar
- 26.Paulsen RR, Larsen R, Nielsen C, Laugesen S, Ersbøll B (2002) Building and testing a statistical shape model of the human ear canal. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2489:373–380Google Scholar
- 27.Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay É (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830Google Scholar
- 28.Pinto C, Çimen S, Gooya A, Lekadir K, Frangi AF (2016) Joint clustering and component analysis of spatio-temporal shape patterns in myocardial infarction. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, pp 171–179Google Scholar
- 29.Ren Y, Wang L, Gao Y, Tang Z, Chen KC, Li J, Shen SGF, Yan J, Lee PKM, Chow B, Xia JJ, Shen D (2014) Estimating anatomically-correct reference model for craniomaxillofacial deformity via sparse representation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 8674 LNCS(PART 2):73–80Google Scholar
- 30.Schultz CJ, Moelker A, Piazza N, Tzikas A, Otten A, Nuis RJ, Neefjes LA, Van Geuns RJ, De Feyter P, Krestin G, Serruys PW, De Jaegere PPT (2010) Three dimensional evaluation of the aortic annulus using multislice computer tomography: are manufacturer’s guidelines for sizing for percutaneous aortic valve replacement helpful?. Eur Heart J 31(7):849–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar