Using a numerical method to precisely evaluate the alpha angle in a hip image
The alpha angle is a parameter extensively used to assess for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in a 2D image of the hip. As this angle requires estimation of the axis of the femoral neck, the drawing of this axis often results in measurement errors due to subjective judgment, influencing inter-rater and intra-rater agreements. In the present study, sampling points were captured from the edges of a femoral neck and head in the 2D image, and the best curves of the two were fitted respectively by using the curve fitting method. The morphology of the femoral neck was outlined by two polynomials, and the femoral head was represented by an equation of a circle. By means of the proposed method, the results reveal that the inter-rater ICCs in X-ray and MRI were respectively 0.905 and 0.969, and the intra-rater ICCs in X-ray and MRI were respectively 0.892 and 0.840. The Bland-Altman plot shows that the values obtained by the proposed method and the conventional method were not consistent; nevertheless, the linear regression analysis indicated the two measurement results had a significant association (p < 0.001). This study provides a repeatable and agreed α angle measuring method, which contributes to identifying normal and abnormal femoral head-neck morphologies. The proposed numerical method would contribute to diagnose early FAI.
KeywordsFemoroacetabular impingement Alpha angle Femoral neck axis Numerical method
We would like to show our gratitude to all the people who greatly assisted the research, and we also thank three anonymous reviewers for their comments.
This research project was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan, under Contract No. MOST104-2221-E-040-002-MY2.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Anđelković Z, Mladenović D (2013) Measuring the osteochondral connection of the femoral head and neck in patients with impingement femoroacetabular by determining the angle of 2 alpha in lateral and anteroposterior hip radiographic images. Vojnosanit Pregl 70(3):259–266. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP110727038A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Anderson LA, Anderson MB, Kapron A, Aoki SK, Erickson JA, Chrastil J, Grijalva R, Peters C (2016) The 2015 Frank Stinchfield award: radiographic abnormalities common in senior athletes with well-functioning hips but not associated with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):342–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4379-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Carlisle JC, Zebala LP, Shia DS, Hunt D, Morgan PM, Prather H, Wright RW, Steger-May K, Clohisy JC (2011) Reliability of various observers in determining common radiographic parameters of adult hip structural anatomy. Iowa Orthop J 31:52–58Google Scholar
- 13.Cooper RJ, Mengoni M, Groves D, Williams S, Bankes MJK, Robinson P, Jones AC (2017) Three-dimensional assessment of impingement risk in geometrically parameterised hips compared with clinical measures. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 33(11):e2867. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Harris MD, Kapron AL, Peters CL, Anderson AE (2014) Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity: implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoroacetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol 83(5):788–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kaplan KM, Shah MR, Youm T (2010) Femoroacetabular impingement: diagnosis and treatment. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 68(2):70–75Google Scholar
- 25.Mose K (1980) Methods of measuring in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease with special regard to the prognosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 150:103–109Google Scholar
- 29.Ratzlaff C, Zhang C, Korzan J, Josey L, Wong H, Cibere J, Prlic HM, Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Li LC, Barber M, Forster BB (2016) The validity of a non-radiologist reader in identifying cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using plain radiography. Rheumatol Int 36(3):371–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3361-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Reichenbach S, Juni P, Werlen S, Nuesch E, Pfirrmann CW, Trelle S, Odermatt A, Hofstetter W, Ganz R, Leunig M (2010) Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62(9):1319–1327. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Saito M, Tsukada S, Yoshida K, Okada Y, Tasaki A (2017) Correlation of alpha angle between various radiographic projections and radial magnetic resonance imaging for cam deformity in femoral head-neck junction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4046-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar