Iterative simulations to estimate the elastic properties from a series of MRI images followed by MRI-US validation
- 152 Downloads
The modeling of breast deformations is of interest in medical applications such as image-guided biopsy, or image registration for diagnostic purposes. In order to have such information, it is needed to extract the mechanical properties of the tissues. In this work, we propose an iterative technique based on finite element analysis that estimates the elastic modulus of realistic breast phantoms, starting from MRI images acquired in different positions (prone and supine), when deformed only by the gravity force. We validated the method using both a single-modality evaluation in which we simulated the effect of the gravity force to generate four different configurations (prone, supine, lateral, and vertical) and a multi-modality evaluation in which we simulated a series of changes in orientation (prone to supine). Validation is performed, respectively, on surface points and lesions using as ground-truth data from MRI images, and on target lesions inside the breast phantom compared with the actual target segmented from the US image. The use of pre-operative images is limited at the moment to diagnostic purposes. By using our method we can compute patient-specific mechanical properties that allow compensating deformations.
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imaging Elastic properties Breast Image alignment Deformable models
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no.688188 as part of the MURAB project.
- 3.Gefen A, Dilmoney B (2007) Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast. Technol Health Care 15(4):259–271Google Scholar
- 9.Eiben B, Han L, Hipwell J, Mertzanidou T, Kabus S, Bülow T, Lorenz C, Newstead GM, Abe H, Keshtgar M (2013) Biomechanically guided prone-to-supine image registration of breast mri using an estimated reference state. In: 2013 IEEE 10th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI). IEEE, pp 214–217Google Scholar
- 10.Eiben B, Vavourakis V, Hipwell JH, Kabus S, Lorenz C, Buelow T, Hawkes DJ (2014) Breast deformation modelling: comparison of methods to obtain a patient specific unloaded configuration, vol 9036, pp 903615–8Google Scholar
- 12.Lee A, Schnabel J, Rajagopal V, Nielsen P, Nash M (2010) Breast image registration by combining finite elements and free-form deformations. In: Digital mammography, pp 736–743Google Scholar
- 13.Carter T, Tanner C, Beechey-Newman N, Barratt D, Hawkes D (2008) Mr navigated breast surgery: method and initial clinical experience. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI, vol 2008, pp 356–363Google Scholar
- 14.Han L, Hipwell J, Mertzanidou T, Carter T, Modat M, Ourselin S, Hawkes D (2011) A hybrid fem-based method for aligning prone and supine images for image guided breast surgery. In: 2011 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from Nano to Macro. IEEE, pp 1239–1242Google Scholar
- 18.Pinto Pereira SM, Hipwell JH, McCormack VA, Tanner C, Moss SM, Wilkinson LS, Khoo LAL, Pagliari C, Skippage PL, Kliger CJ (2010) Automated registration of diagnostic to prediagnostic x-ray mammograms: evaluation and comparison to radiologists’ accuracy. Med Phys 37(9):4530–4539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lautrup B (2011) Physics of continuous matter, 2nd edn: exotic and everyday phenomena in the macroscopic world. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- 23.Rankin A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Lasso A, Heffter T, Fichtinger G (2014) Plus: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. In: IEEE transactions on biomedical engineeringGoogle Scholar
- 24.Zerbato D, Forgione A, Fiorini P (2016) University of Verona Santorzo Vicenza D. Dall’Alba, F. Bovo. Towards an intra-operative calibration-preserving freehand ultrasound system. In: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS)Google Scholar