Use of phase-locking value in sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface: zero-phase coupling and effects of spatial filters
- 391 Downloads
Phase-locking value (PLV) is a potentially useful feature in sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface (BCI). However, volume conduction may cause spurious zero-phase coupling between two EEG signals and it is not clear whether PLV effects are independent of spectral amplitude. Volume conduction might be reduced by spatial filtering, but it is uncertain what impact this might have on PLV. Therefore, the goal of this study was to explore whether zero-phase PLV is meaningful and how it is affected by spatial filtering. Both amplitude and PLV feature were extracted in the frequency band of 10–15 Hz by classical methods using archival EEG data of 18 subjects trained on a two-target BCI task. The results show that with right ear-referenced data, there is meaningful long-range zero-phase synchronization likely involving the primary motor area and the supplementary motor area that cannot be explained by volume conduction. Another novel finding is that the large Laplacian spatial filter enhances the amplitude feature but eliminates most of the phase information seen in ear-referenced data. A bipolar channel using phase-coupled areas also includes both phase and amplitude information and has a significant practical advantage since fewer channels required.
KeywordsBrain–computer interface (BCI) Phase-locking value (PLV) Spatial filters Zero phase
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Grants HD30146 46) (NCMRR/NICHD), EB00856 (NIBIB &NINDS), National “111” Project (B08036) and in part by the China Scholarship Council. The authors would like to thank Jonathan Carp and Li Zhang for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
- 18.Leocani L, Toro C, Manganotti P, Zhuang P, Hallett M (1997) Event-related coherence and event-related desynchronization/synchronization in the 10 Hz and 20 Hz EEG during self-paced movements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Potentials Sect 104:199–206. doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(96)96051-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Westdorp AF, Wijesinghe RS, Tucker DM, Silberstein RB, Cadusch PJ (1997) EEG coherency: i: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 103:499–515. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00066-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH (1999) Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol 110:1842–1857. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
- 35.Sharbrough F, Chatrian CE, Lesser RP, Luders H, Nuwer M and Picton TW (1991) American electroencephalographic society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 8:200–202Google Scholar
- 43.Wang Y, Hong B, Gao X, Gao S (2006) Phase synchrony measurement in motor cortex for classifying single-trial EEG during motor imagery. IEEE, pp 75–78Google Scholar