An automatic and patient-specific algorithm to design the optimal insertion direction of pedicle screws for spine surgery templates
- 310 Downloads
Many diseases of the spine require surgical treatments that are currently performed based on the experience of the surgeon. For pedicle arthrodesis surgery, two critical factors must be addressed: Screws must be applied correctly and exposure to harmful radiation must be avoided. The incorrect positioning of the screws may cause operating failures that lead to subsequent reoperations, an increase in the overall duration of surgery and, therefore, more harmful, real-time X-ray checks. In this paper, the authors solve these problems by developing a method to realize a customized surgical template that acts as a drilling template. The template has two cylindrical guides that follow a correct trajectory previously calculated by means of an automatic algorithm generated on the basis of a vertebra CAD model for a specific patient. The surgeon sets the template (drilling guides) on the patient’s vertebra and safely applies the screws. Three surgical interventions for spinal stabilization have been performed using the template. These have had excellent results with regard to the accuracy of the screw positioning, reduction of the overall duration of the intervention, and reduction of the number of times the patient was exposed to X-rays.
KeywordsSpine surgery Surgical template Pedicle arthrodesis Screw direction optimization X-ray minimization
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Italian ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Italian Law and have been approved by the Ethical Review Board of the San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona University Hospital in Salerno, where the trial/tests were conducted.
All human participants have had the testing protocol explained, including the nature of the used medical devices and risks and benefits they might have while being treated with the new surgery device. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Agrillo U (2013) UOC neurochirurgia. In: ASL ROMA 2. http://www.aslromab.it/cittadini/ospedali/pertini/dip_chirurgia/UOC_neurochirurgia.php
- 11.Kashani J (2012) A surgical drill guide for pedicle screw placement. Int Conf Biomed Eng 1:305–307Google Scholar
- 12.Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Li YB, Shi JH, Chen GP, Chen YB (2009) Rapid Prototyping drill guide template for lumbar pedicle screw placement. Chin J Traumatol 12(3):171–177Google Scholar
- 17.Naddeo F, Baldino L, Cardea S, Naddeo A, Reverchon E (2016) Optimization of an ad hoc realized lattice structure structured RVE for FEM modeling of nanoporous biopolymeric scaffolds obtained by supercritical fluids assisted process. Chem Eng Trans 49:169–174Google Scholar
- 20.Pacheco HO (2007) Method for determining size and placement of pedicle screw in spinal surgery. Patent CN1960680BGoogle Scholar
- 21.Popescu D, Parpala RC, Laptoiu DC, Antoniac I (2010) Computer-aided technique for determining spinal pedicle screw size and optimal insertion trajectory. Ann DAAAM Proc 1:527–533Google Scholar
- 22.Popescu D, Amza CGh, Anania DF, Amza Gh, Cicic DT (2011) Intelligent x-ray based training system for pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Acad J Manuf Eng 9(1):94–101Google Scholar
- 23.Popescu D, Anania DF, Amza CG, Cicic DT (2012) Design and rapid manufacturing of patient-specific spinal surgical guides: a survey. Proc Manuf Syst 7(2):2067–9238Google Scholar
- 24.Porada S, Millnerb P, Chivertonb N, Berryc E, Seedhom BB (2001) Computer aided surgery with lumbar vertebral drill-guides, using computer aided planning. Design and visualisation. http://events.cs.bham.ac.uk/miua2001/posters/porada.pdf
- 28.Salako F, Aubin CE, Fortin C, Labelle H (2003) Development of patient-specific surgical templates, using rapid prototyping, for the fixation of pedicle screws. ITBMRBM 24:199–205Google Scholar
- 29.Sugawara T, Higashiyama N, Kaneyama S, Takabatake M, Watanabe N, Uchida F, Sumi M, Mizoi K (2013) Multistep pedicle screw insertion procedure with patient-specific lamina fit-and-lock templates for the thoracic spine: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(2):85–90. doi: 10.3171/20134SPINE121059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Techno DESIGN Srl, Naddeo A, Cataldo E, Naddeo F, Cappetti N, Ruggieri R (2015) Dima di foratura direzionale per chirurgia vertebrale. Italian patent NA2015U000019Google Scholar
- 31.Techno DESIGN Srl, Naddeo A, Cataldo E, Naddeo F, Cappetti N, Ruggieri R (2015) Metodologia per l’individuazione della direzione ottima e del diametro massimo di una vite peduncolare affinché la vite non fuoriesca dal peduncolo durante l’inserimento. Italian patent no. 102015000036889. European patent no. 16180848.0 (method for identifying the optimal direction and maximum diameter of a pedicle screw so that the screw will not come out of the pedicle in operations of pedicle arthrodesis)Google Scholar
- 32.Van Brussel K, Vander Sloten J, Van Audekercke R (1997) Medical image based design of an individualized surgical guide for pedicle screw insertion. In: Proceedings 18th annual conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. Bridg Discipl Biomed 1(1):225–226Google Scholar
- 33.Wiker RB, Tedla B (2004) Methods and systems for image-guided placement of implants. Patent US 2004/0240715 A1Google Scholar
- 34.Yoo T (2003) 3D informatics: a research program in high performance computing; a report to the board of scientific counselors, lister hill national center for biomedical communicationsGoogle Scholar