Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computational fluid dynamics-based study of possibility of generating pulsatile blood flow via a continuous-flow VAD

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Until recent years, it was almost beyond remedy to save the life of end-stage heart failure patients without considering a heart transplant. This is while the need for healthy organs has always far exceeded donations. However, the evolution of VAD technology has certainly changed the management of these patients. Today, blood pumps are designed either pulsatile flow or continuous flow, each of which has its own concerns and limitations. For instance, pulsatile pumps are mostly voluminous and hardly can be used for children. On the other hand, the flow generated by continuous-flow pumps is in contrast with pulsatile flow of the natural heart. In this project, having used computational fluid dynamics, we studied the possibility of generating pulsatile blood flow via a continuous-flow blood pump by adjusting the rotational speed of the pump with two distinct patterns (sinusoidal and trapezoidal), both of which have been proposed and set based on physiological needs and blood flow waveform of the natural heart. An important feature of this study is setting the outlet pressure of the pump similar to the physiological conditions of a patient with heart failure, and since these axial pumps are sensitive to outlet pressures, more secure and reliable results of their performance are achieved. Our results show a slight superiority of a sinusoidal pattern compared to a trapezoidal one with the potential to achieve an adequate pulsatile flow by precisely controlling the rotational speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal S, High KM (2012) Newer-generation ventricular assist devices. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 26:117–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ANSYS CFX-solver theory guide (2009) ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA

  3. Apel J, Paul R, Klaus S, Siess T, Reul H (2001) Assessment of hemolysis related quantities in a microaxial blood pump by computational fluid dynamics. Artif Organs 25:341–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arora D, Behr M, Pasquali M (2006) Hemolysis estimation in a centrifugal blood pump using a tensor-based measure. Artif Organs 30:539–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyle AJ, Ascheim DD, Russo MJ, Kormos RL, John R, Naka Y, Gelijns AC, Hong KN, Teuteberg JJ (2011) Clinical outcomes for continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients stratified by pre-operative INTERMACS classification. J Heart Lung Transplant 30:402–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgreen GW, Antaki JF, Griffith BP (1996) A design improvement strategy for axial blood pumps using computational fluid dynamics. ASAIO J 42:M354–M359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Centrigugal LVAS (2016). Evaheart Inc., Houston, TX

  8. Chan W, Wong Y, Ding Y, Chua L, Yu S (2002) Numerical investigation of the effect of blade geometry on blood trauma in a centrifugal blood pump. Artif Organs 26:785–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng A, Williamitis CA, Slaughter MS (2014) Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility? Ann Cardiothorac Surg 3:573

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbett SC, Ajdari A, Coskun AU, Nayeb-Hashemi H (2010) Effect of pulsatile blood flow on thrombosis potential with a step wall transition. ASAIO J 56:290–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dexter EU, Aluri S, Radcliffe RR, Zhu H, Carlson DD, Heilman TE, Chandran KB, Richenbacher WE (1999) In vivo demonstration of cavitation potential of a mechanical heart valve. ASAIO J 45:436–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Feller ED, Sorensen EN, Haddad M, Pierson RN, Johnson FL, Brown JM, Griffith BP (2007) Clinical outcomes are similar in pulsatile and nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device recipients. Ann Thorac Surg 83:1082–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frazier O, Khalil HA, Benkowski RJ, Cohn WE (2010) Optimization of axial-pump pressure sensitivity for a continuous-flow total artificial heart. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:687–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayward CS, Salamonsen R, Keogh AM, Woodard J, Ayre P, Prichard R, Walker R, Kotlyar E, Macdonald PS, Jansz P (2011) Effect of alteration in pump speed on pump output and left ventricular filling with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J 57:495–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. HeartMate I (2012) LVAS operating manual. Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, 171:e7

  16. Heuser G, Opitz R (1980) A Couette viscometer for short time shearing of blood. Biorheology 17:17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kato TS, Chokshi A, Singh P, Khawaja T, Cheema F, Akashi H, Shahzad K, Iwata S, Homma S, Takayama H (2011) Effects of continuous-versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling. Circ Heart Fail 4:546

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson L, Miller M, Young JB (2012) Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): on track to compete with heart transplantation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:584–603

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Miller MA, Baldwin JT, Young JB (2013) Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 32:141–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Klotz S, Deng MC, Stypmann J, Roetker J, Wilhelm MJ, Hammel D, Scheld HH, Schmid C (2004) Left ventricular pressure and volume unloading during pulsatile versus nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg 77:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laskey W, Kussmaul W (1987) Arterial wave reflection in heart failure. Circulation 75:711–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Margulies KB, Rame JE (2011) Adaptations to pulsatile versus nonpulsatile ventricular assist device support. Circ Heart Fail 4:535–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miyazoe Y, Sawairi T, Ito K, Konishi Y, Yamane T, Nishida M, Asztalos B, Masuzawa T, Tsukiya T, Endo S, Taenaka Y (1999) Computational fluid dynamics to establish the design process of a centrifugal blood pump: second report. Artif Organs 23:762–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moazami N, Dembitsky W, Adamson R, Steffen R, Soltesz E, Starling R, Fukamachi K (2015) Does pulsatility matter in the era of continuous-flow blood pumps? J Heart Lung Transplant 34:999–1004

  25. Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD (2013) Deaths: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 61:1–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Park SJ, Tector A, Piccioni W, Raines E, Gelijns A, Moskowitz A, Rose E, Holman W, Furukawa S, Frazier OH (2005) Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pirbodaghi T, Axiak S, Weber A, Gempp T, Vandenberghe S (2012) Pulsatile control of rotary blood pumps: does the modulation waveform matter? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:970–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Prosi M, Perktold K, Schima H (2007) Effect of continuous arterial blood flow in patients with rotary cardiac assist device on the washout of a stenosis wake in the carotid bifurcation: a computer simulation study. J Biomech 40:2236–2243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sansone F, Zingarelli E, Flocco R, Dato GMA, Parisi F, Punta G, Forsennati PG, Bardi GL, del Ponte S, Patanè F (2012) Pulsed or continuous flow in long-term assist devices: a debated topic. Transplant Rev 26:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmid C, Tjan TD, Etz C, Schmidt C, Wenzelburger F, Wilhelm M, Rothenburger M, Drees G, Scheld HH (2005) First clinical experience with the Incor left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 24:1188–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shahraki ZH, Oscuii HN (2014) Numerical investigation of three patterns of motion in an electromagnetic pulsatile VAD. ASAIO J 60:304–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Russell SD, Conte JV, Feldman D, Sun B, Tatooles AJ, Delgado RM III, Long JW (2009) Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med 361:2241–2251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Soucy KG, Koenig SC, Giridharan GA, Sobieski MA, Slaughter MS (2013) Rotary pumps and diminished pulsatility: do we need a pulse? ASAIO J 59:355–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Untaroiu A (2006) LEV-VAD2 Axial Flow blood pump optimized flow path design by means of computational fluid dynamics. University of Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. White FM, Corfield I (1991) Viscous fluid flow, vol 3. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wieselthaler GM, Schima H, Hiesmayr M, Pacher R, Laufer G, Noon GP, DeBakey M, Wolner E (2000) First clinical experience with the DeBakey VAD continuous-axial-flow pump for bridge to transplantation. Circulation 101:356–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Qian Y, Bertram CD (2000) Computational fluid dynamics analysis of hydrodynamic bearings of the VentrAssist rotary blood pump. Artif Organs 24:488–491

  38. Yano T, Sekine K, Mitoh A, Mitamura Y, Okamoto E, Kim DW, Nishimura I, Murabayashi S, Yozu R (2003) An estimation method of hemolysis within an axial flow blood pump by computational fluid dynamics analysis. Artif Organs 27:920–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of the members of Computational Biomechanical Laboratory of Sahand University of Technology for their collaboration and without them the project would not be possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biomechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, Iran

    Erfan Nammakie, Hanieh Niroomand-Oscuii, Mojtaba Koochaki & Farzan Ghalichi

Authors
  1. Erfan Nammakie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanieh Niroomand-Oscuii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mojtaba Koochaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Farzan Ghalichi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanieh Niroomand-Oscuii.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nammakie, E., Niroomand-Oscuii, H., Koochaki, M. et al. Computational fluid dynamics-based study of possibility of generating pulsatile blood flow via a continuous-flow VAD. Med Biol Eng Comput 55, 167–178 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1523-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1523-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation