A simulation technique for computation of the dosimetric effects of setup, organ motion and delineation uncertainties in radiotherapy
- 155 Downloads
In this study, we introduce a novel simulation technique to incorporate delineation errors into radiotherapy treatment margins and combine them with organ motion and set-up errors to investigate the cumulative dosimetric effects in different tumour sites. The effects of applying patient realignment correction protocols for radical treatments of prostate, lung and brain tumours were also modelled. Simulations were based on data from measurements using image-guidance techniques, including the use of fiducial markers in prostate and breathing correction techniques for the lung. The use of different sizes of planning target volume (PTV) margins was also evaluated. The prostate clinical target volumes’ V99% showed up to 3.2% improvement with reduction in treatment uncertainties. For the lung plans, the V99% increased by up to an average of 10% with increase in treatment margin size from 0.5 to 1.5 cm. This improvement was, however, at the detriment of the dose delivered to the critical organs where the maximum dose received by the spinal cord increased by up to 0.5 Gy per fraction. These results were used to deduce the possible margin reductions and dose escalation achievable with reduced uncertainties.
KeywordsMonte Carlo simulation Radiotherapy Motion correction Radiation planning Treatment margins
This study is financially supported by the Medical Physics Department of Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, this assistance is gratefully acknowledged.
- 2.BIR (2003) Geometric uncertainties in radiotherapy—defining the planning target volume. British Institute of Radiology, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 3.Boersma LJ, van den Brink M, Bruce AM, Shouman T, Gras L, Velde A, Lebescue JV (1998) Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70–78 Gy) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose-volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:83–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mzenda B, Hosseini-Ashrafi ME, Palmer A, Liu H, Brown DJ (2008) Quantification of the effects of random and systematic errors in external beam radiotherapy using a Monte Carlo simulation. In: Proceedings of the IPEM biennial radiotherapy meeting, pp 92–93Google Scholar
- 19.Mzenda B, Hosseini-Ashrafi ME, Palmer A, Liu H, Brown DJ (2008) An intelligent Gaussian mixture model to improve delineation accuracy in radiotherapy. In: Proceedings of the IPEM biennial radiotherapy meeting, pp 131–132Google Scholar
- 20.Piermattei A, Fidanzio A, Azario L, Greco F, Mameli A, Cilla S, Grimaldi L, D’Onofrio G, Augelli BG, Stimato G, Gaudino D, Ramella S, D’Angelillo R, Cellini F, Trodella L (2009) In patient dose reconstruction using a cine acquisition for dynamic arc radiation therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 47(4):425–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Steel GG (2002) Basic clinical radiobiology. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar