Abstract
We present an advanced method for feature extraction and cluster analysis of surface electromyograms (EMG) and acceleration signals in Parkinson’s disease (PD). In the method, 12 different EMG and acceleration signal features are extracted and used to form high-dimensional feature vectors. The dimensionality of these vectors is then reduced by using the principal component approach. Finally, the cluster analysis of feature vectors is performed in a low-dimensional eigenspace. The method was tested with EMG and acceleration data of 42 patients with PD and 59 healthy controls. The obtained discrimination between patients and controls was promising. According to clustering results, one cluster contained 90% of the healthy controls and two other clusters 76% of the patients. Seven patients with severe motor dysfunctions were distinguished in one of the patient clusters. In the future, the clinical value of the method should be further evaluated.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.



References
- 1.
Clancy EA, Farina D, Filligoi G (2004) Single-channel techniques for information extraction from the surface EMG signal. Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and noninvasive applications. Wiley-IEEE Press, USA
- 2.
De Lau LML, Breteler MMB (2006) Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 5:525–535
- 3.
De Michele G, Sello S, Carboncini MC, Rossi B, Strambi S (2003) Cross-correlation time–frequency analysis for multiple EMG signals in Parkinson’s disease: wavelet approach. Med Eng Phys 25:361–369
- 4.
Eerola J, Tienari PJ, Kaakkola S, Nikkinen P and Launes J (2005) How useful is [123I]β-CIT SPECT in clinical practise? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1211–1216
- 5.
Fattorini L, Felici F, Filligoi GC, Traballesi M, Farina D (2005) Influence of high motor unit synchronization levels on non-linear and spectral variables of the surface EMG. J Neurosci Methods 143:133–139
- 6.
Flament D, Vaillancourt DE, Kempf T, Shannon K, Corcos DM (2003) EMG remains fractioned in Parkinson’s disease, despite practice-related improvements in performance. Clin Neurophysiol 114:2385–2396
- 7.
Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, USA
- 8.
Kuusela TA, Jartti TT, Tahvanainen KUO, Kaila TJ (2002) Nonlinear methods of biosignal analysis in assessing terbutaline-induced heart rate and blood pressure changes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282:H773–H781
- 9.
Pfann KD, Buchman AS, Comella CL, Corcos DM (2001) Control of movement distance in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 16(6):1048–1065
- 10.
Richman JS, Moorman JR (2000) Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278:H2039–H2049
- 11.
Rissanen S, Kankaanpää M, Tarvainen MP, Nuutinen J, Tarkka IM, Airaksinen O, Karjalainen PA (2007) Analysis of surface EMG signal morphology in Parkinson’s disease. Physiol Meas 28:1507–1521
- 12.
Robichaud JA, Pfann KD, Comella CL, Corcos DM (2002) Effect of medication on EMG patterns in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 17(5):950–960
- 13.
Robichaud JA, Pfann KD, Comella CL, Brandabur M, Corcos DM (2004) Greater impairment of extension movements as compared to flexion movements in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 156:240–254
- 14.
Robichaud JA, Pfann KD, Vaillancourt DE, Comella CL, Corcos DM (2005) Force control and disease severity in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 20(4):441–450
- 15.
Sturman MM, Vaillancourt DE, Metman LV, Bakay RAE, Corcos DM (2004) Effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation and medication on resting and postural tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 127:2131–2143
- 16.
Tarvainen MP, Ranta-aho PO, Karjalainen PA (2002) An advanced detrending method with application to HRV analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49(2):172–175
- 17.
Tolosa E, Wenning G, Poewe W (2006) The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 5:75–86
- 18.
Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K (2006) Pattern recognition, 3rd edn. Academic Press, USA
- 19.
Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM (2000) The dynamics of resting and postural tremor in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 111:2046–2056
- 20.
Valls-Solé J, Valldeoriola F (2002) Neurophysiological correlate of clinical signs in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 113:792–805
- 21.
Webber CL, Zbilut JP (1994) Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. J Appl Physiol 76(2):965–973
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rissanen, S.M., Kankaanpää, M., Meigal, A. et al. Surface EMG and acceleration signals in Parkinson’s disease: feature extraction and cluster analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 46, 849–858 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0369-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Keywords
- Electromyography (EMG)
- Parkinson’s disease
- Nonlinear analysis
- Signal morphology
- Cluster analysis