Validation of a clinical finite element model of the human lumbosacral spine
Very few finite element models on the lumbosacral spine have been reported because of its unique biomechanical characteristics. In addition, most of these lumbosacral spine models have been only validated with rotation at single moment values, ignoring the inherent nonlinear nature of the moment–rotation response of the spine. Because a majority of lumbar spine surgeries are performed between L4 and S1 levels, and the confidence in the stress analysis output depends on the model validation, the objective of the present study was to develop a unique finite element model of the lumbosacral junction. The clinically applicable model was validated throughout the entire nonlinear range. It was developed using computed tomography scans, subjected to flexion and extension, and left and right lateral bending loads, and quantitatively validated with cumulative variance analyses. Validation results for each loading mode and for each motion segment (L4-L5, L5-S1) and bisegment (L4-S1) are presented in the paper.
KeywordsFinite Element Model Annulus Fibrosis Reference Node Cumulative Variance Coupling Element
This study was supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Research.
- 4.Decker H, Shapiro S (1957) Herniated lumbar intervertebral disks; results of surgical treatment without the routine use of spinal fusion. AMA Arch Surg 5:77–84Google Scholar
- 6.Eberlein R, Holzapfel G, Frohlich M (2004) Mutli-segment FEA of the human lumbar spine including the heterogeneity of the annulus fibrosus. Comput Mech 4:147–163Google Scholar
- 9.Farfan (1973) Mechanical disorder of the low back. Lea & Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 10.Galante JO (1967) Tensile properties of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 100:1–91Google Scholar
- 24.Panjabi M, Oxland T, Yamamoto I, Crisco J (1994) Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar and lumbosacral spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:413–423Google Scholar
- 29.Schultz A, Warwick D, Berkson M, Nachemson A (1979) Mechanical behavior of human lumbar spine motion segments—Part I. Responses in flexion, extension, lateral bending and torsion. J Biomech Eng 101:46–52Google Scholar
- 35.Spangfort E (1972) The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand 142:40–44Google Scholar
- 36.Tencer A, Ahmed A, Burke D (1982) Some static mechanical properties of the lumbar intervertebral joint, intact and injured. J Biomech Eng 104:193–201Google Scholar
- 40.Totoribe K, Chosa E, Tajima N (2004) A biomechanical study of lumbar fusion based on a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element method. J Spinal Dis Tech 17:47–153Google Scholar
- 46.Yoganandan N, Myklebust JB, Ray G, Sances A Jr (1987) Mathematical and finite element analysis of spinal injuries. CRC Rev Biomed Eng 15:29–93Google Scholar