Automated image processing method for the diagnosis and classification of malaria on thin blood smears

  • Nicholas E. Ross
  • Charles J. Pritchard
  • David M. Rubin
  • Adriano G. Dusé
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Malaria is a serious global health problem, and rapid, accurate diagnosis is required to control the disease. An image processing algorithm to automate the diagnosis of malaria on thin blood smears is developed. The image classification system is designed to positively identify malaria parasites present in thin blood smears, and differentiate the species of malaria. Images are acquired using a charge-coupled device camera connected to a light microscope. Morphological and novel threshold selection techniques are used to identify erythrocytes (red blood cells) and possible parasites present on microscopic slides. Image features based on colour, texture and the geometry of the cells and parasites are generated, as well as features that make use of a priori knowledge of the classification problem and mimic features used by human technicians. A two-stage tree classifier using backpropogation feedforward neural networks distinguishes between true and false positives, and then diagnoses the species (Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale or P. malariae) of the infection. Malaria samples obtained from the Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the University of the Witwatersrand Medical School are used for training and testing of the system. Infected erythrocytes are positively identified with a sensitivity of 85% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81%, which makes the method highly sensitive at diagnosing a complete sample provided many views are analysed. Species were correctly determined for 11 out of 15 samples.

References

  1. 1.
    Bloland PB (2001) Drug resistance in malaria, WHO/CDS/CSR/DRS/ 2001.4. World Health Organization, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruce-Chwatt LJ (1985) Essential malariology, 2nd edn. William Heinemann Medical Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Ruberto C, Dempster A, Khan S, Jarra B (2002) Analysis of infected blood cell images using morphological operators. Image Vis Comput 20(2):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foley DH (1972) Consideration of sample and feature size. IEEE Trans Inform Theory IT-18 618–626Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Foster S, Phillips M (1998) Economics and its contribution to the fight against malaria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 92:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hibbard LS, McCasland JS, Brunstrom JE, Pearlman AL (1996) Automated recognition and mapping of immmunolabelled neurons in the developing brain. J Microsc 183(8):241–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hughes GF (1968) On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Inform Theory IT-14, 55–63Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Makler MT, Palmer CJ, Alger AL (1998) A review of practical techniques for the diagnosis of malaria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 92(4):419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohana Rao KNR, Dempster AG (2001) Area-granulometry: an improved estimator of size distribution of image objects. Electron Lett 37(15):950–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mui JK, Fu K-S (1980) Automated classification of nucleated blood cells using a binary tree classifier. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 2(5):429–443Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oaks SCJ, Mitchell VS, Pearson GW, Carpenter CCJ (eds) (1991) Malaria: obstacles and opportunities, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. A report of the committee for the study on malaria prevention and control: Status review and alternative strategiesGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohrt C, Purnomo, Sutamihardja MA, Tang D, Kain KC (2002) Impact of microscopy error on estimates of protective efficacy in malaria-prevention trials. J Infect Dis 186(4):540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-9(1):62–66MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pammenter MD (1988) Techniques for the diagnosis of malaria. S Afr Med J 74(2):55–57Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soni PN, Gouws E (1996) Severe and complicated malaria in KwaZulu-Natal. S Afr Med J 86(6):653–656Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Theodoridis S, Koutroumbas K (1999) Pattern Recognition. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thiran J-P, Macq B (1996) Morphological feature extraction for the classification of digitalim ages of cancerous tissues. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43(10):1011–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    World Health Organisation (1991) Basic malaria microscopy. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas E. Ross
    • 1
  • Charles J. Pritchard
    • 2
  • David M. Rubin
    • 2
  • Adriano G. Dusé
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringCambridge UniversityCambridgeCB2 1PZUK
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Information EngineeringUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburg, WitsSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious DiseasesUniversity of the Witwatersrand Medical SchoolParktownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations