Advertisement

Frontiers of Education in China

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 300–315 | Cite as

Rehabilitation of the imperial examination system

  • Liu Haifeng 
Research Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

Since the abolishment of the imperial examination system (the IES) in 1905, the system has been the target of severe criticism by most Chinese people. This paper is intended to clear up the misunderstanding of the IES in seven respects based on some ideas of rehabilitation of the IES over the past 100 years. In the author’s opinion, the IES is actually not so contemptible as most people think, at least it is not a bad system. The examination system was an attempt to recruit men on the basis of merit rather than because of social position or political connections, which is a great invention of China. Although it was abolished, the method to select talents by means of examination has not yet been and cannot be exterminated, and it is still proper to be used in the present society. The IES with a 1,300-year history has rich experiences and valuable lessons, which have implications to various examination reforms.

Keywords

The imperial examination Examination The admission examination of colleges and universities Rehabilitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liang Qichao. “Guanzhi yu guangui” 官制与官规 (Official Systems and Regulations). In “Yin Bingshi heji” 饮冰室合集 (Collected Works of Yin Bing Shi). Beijing: Zhonghua Press. 1989. Vol. 23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tian Jianye, et al. 田建业等, “Du Yaquan wenxuan” 杜亚泉文选 (Selected Readings of Du Yaquan). Shanghai: Huazhong shifan daxue chubanshe. 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun Yet-sen 孙中山. “Yu Liu Chengyu duihua” 与刘成禺对话 (A Dialogue with Liu Chengyu). In “Sun Yet-sen quanji” 孙中山全集 (The Complete Works of Sun Yet-sen). Zhonghua chubanshe. 1986. Vol.1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu Shi 胡适. “Zhongguo de wenyi fuxing” 中国的文艺复兴 (The Chinese Renaissance). Beijing: Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu chubanshe. 2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geng Zhiyun 耿志云. “Hu shi nianpu” 胡适年谱 (A Chronicle of Hushi’s Life). Chengdu: Sichuan renmin chubanshe. 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qian Mu 钱穆. “Guo shi xin lun” 国史新论 (New Comments on National History). Taibei: Dong da book company. 1984.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qian Mu 钱穆. “Zhongguo lidai zhengzhi deshi” 中国历代政治得失 (Chinese Political Success and Failure in Past Dynasties). Beijing: Sanlian chubanshe. 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang xuewei 杨学为. “Zhongguo xuyao keju xue” 中国需要“科举学” (China Needs the Study of the Imperial Examination). Xiamen daxue xuebao 厦门大学学报 (Journal of Xiamen University). Vol.4. 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ge Jianxiong 葛剑雄. “Keju, kaoshi yu rencai” 科举、考试与人才 (The Imperial Examination and the Talented). In “Rencai yu jingjin, shehui, wenhua fazhan” 人才与经济、社会、文化发展 (The Talented and Economy, Society, Cultural Development) 第二届中国东南地区人才问题国际研讨会论文集 (Collected Theses for the 2nd International Deliberating Meeting on the Issues of the Talented in the South-East China). Nanjing: Dongnan University Press. 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shen Dengmiao 沈登苗. “Mingqing quanguo jinshi yu rencai de shikong fenbu jiqi Xianghu guanxi” 明清全国进士与人才的时空分布及其相互关系 (The Time-Spatial Distribution and Inter-Relationships Between the Successful Candidates in the Highest Imperial Examinations and the Talented in the Ming-Qing Dynasties”. “Zhongguo wenhua yanjiu” 中国文化研究 (Studies on Chinese Culture). 1999. Volume Winter. 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo Changzhi 过常职. “Tangdai fan keju sichao yu keju kaoshi de libi” 唐代反科举思潮与科举考试的利弊 (The Ideological Trend of the Anti-Imperial Examinations in the Dang Dynasty and the Advantage and Disadvantage of the Imperial Examinations). Anhui jiaoyu xueyuan xuebao 安徽教育学院学报 (Journal of AnHui Educational College). Vol.1. 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qin Hui 秦晖. “Keju guanliaozhi de jishu, zhidu yu zhengzhi zhexue hanyi” 科举官僚制的技术、制度与政治哲学涵义 (Bureaucratic Skills, Systems and Political Philosophical Connotations for the Imperial Examinations). Zhanlue yu guanli 战略与管理 (Strategies and Management). 1996. Vol. 6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jiang Dehai 蒋德海. “Kejuzhi zai zhongguo jindai de zaoyu” 科举制在中国近代的遭遇 (The Suffering Experience of the Imperial Examinations in Modern History). Fudan xuebao 复旦学报 (Journal of Fudan University). 1996. Vol.5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin, W. A. P., A Cycle of Cathay, or China, South and North with Personal Reminiscences. Edinburgh and London: Oliphant Anderson and Ferrier. 1896.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Haifeng 刘海峰. “Kejuzhi dui xifang kaoshi zhidu yingxiang xintan” 科举制对西方뾼试制度影响新探 (A New Perspective for the Effects on the Western Examination Systems). Zhongguo shehui kexue 中国社会科学 (Chinese Social Science). Vol.5. 2001.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu Haifeng 刘海峰. “Keju xue de shiji huigu” “科举学”的世纪回顾 (A Centenary Review on the Study of the Imperial Examinations”. Xiamen daxue xuebao Xiamen daxue xuebao (Journal of Xiamen University). Vol.3. 1999.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuo Tuo 脱脱. “XuanJu Zhi” 选举志 (History of Selection). In “Song shi” 宋史 (The History of Song Dynasty). Beijing: Zhonghua Press. 1977. Vol. 155.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dai Biaoyuan 戴表元. “Shan yuan ji” 剡源集 (Collections of Shan Yuan) In “The Preface to the Poetry of Chen Wuyi”. Vol.8. Shanghai: Commerce Press. 1935.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin, W. A. P. A Cycle of Cathay, or China, South and North with Personal Reminiscences. Edinburgh and London: Oliphant Anderson and Ferrier. 1896.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ouyang xiu 欧阳修. “OuYang wenzhong gong ji” 欧阳文忠公集 (Collected Works of OuYangWenZhong). In “Lun zhu lu qu ren zazi”. Beijing: Zhonghua Press. 2001. Vol.113.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang Xuan 张萱. “Xi yuan wenjian lu” 西园闻见录 (Record of what one sees and hears about Xi Yuang). Vol. 44. “XuanJu.KeChang” 选举· 科场 (Selection and the imperial examination). In “Li Bu”. Vol.3. in “Xu xiu si ku quan shu” 续修四库全书 (Extend Compilation Ancient Books in China). Vol. 1169. Shanghai: Shanghai Ancient Book Press. 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu Sanzhong 徐三重. “CaiQinLu” 采芹录. Beijing: Commerce Press. 1987. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sun Shaozhen 孙绍振. “ Feichu quanguo tongyi gaokao tizhi” (Abolishment of the National United Entrance Examination System), in “YiShu.ShengHuo” 艺术·生活 (Arts and Life). 1998. Vol.6.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu Haifeng 刘海峰. “Zhi jin tong gu kan keju” 知今通古看科举 (The Study of the Imperial Examination from a Historical Perspective View). In “Jiaoyu yanjiu” 教育研究 (Educational Research). 2003. Vol.12.]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationXiamen UniversityXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations