Frontiers of Biology in China

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 151–157 | Cite as

Characteristics and functions of traditional homegardens: a review

Review

Abstract

Traditional agroecosystems play an important role in the conservation of biodiversity and in sustainable development. As a typical type of traditional agroecosystem, traditional homegardens have been receiving increasing attention from scientists, especially ethnobotanists. They are considered as germplasm banks for many crops and other economic plants. They are also a key site for domestication of wild plants. Current ethnobotanical studies on homegardens focus on their structures, floristic composition, and contributions to their owners. Traditional homegardens often show complicated structures, diverse floristic compositions, multiple functions, low input (including labor and money), and ecological and socioeconomic sustainability. The characteristics and functions of traditional homegardens are closely related to many factors, such as their geographic location and the cultural backgrounds and socioeconomic conditions of their owners. Many researches on homegardens are conducted in the tropics. There are few studies on the dynamics of traditional homegardens, especially those located in temperate, arid and semi-arid zones. The dynamics of homegardens and the factors affecting these processes will be a fruitful field for future research.

Keywords

traditional agroecosystem homegarden ethnobotany conservation of biodiversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiyelaagbe I O O, Adeola A O, Popoola L, Obisesan K O (1998). Agroforestry potential of Dacryodes edulis in the oil palm-cassava belt of southeastern Nigeria. Agroforestry Systems, 40: 263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque U P, Andrade L H C, Caballero J (2005). Structure and floristics of homegardens in Northeastern Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments, 62: 491–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali A M S (2005). Homegardens in smallholder farming systems: examples from Bangladesh. Human Ecology, 33(2): 245–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anegbeh P O, Ukafor V, Usoro C, Tchoundjeu Z, Leakey R R B, Schreckenberg K (2005). Domestication of Dacryodes edulis: 1. Phenotypic variation of fruit traits from 100 trees in southeast Nigeria. New Forests, 29: 149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angel-Pérez A L D, Mendoza M A (2004). Totonac homegardens and natural resources in Veracruz, Mexico. Agriculture and Human Values, 21: 329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arora R K (1997). Ethnobotany and its role in the conservation and use of plant genetic resources in India. Ethnobotany, 9: 6–15Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin T J, Montañez P L, Jiménez J J M, Gillespie A R (2001). Carbon, water and nutrient flux in Maya homegardens in the Yucatan peninsula of México. Agroforestry Systems, 53: 103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanckaert I, Swennen R L, Flores P M, Lopez R I, Saade R L (2004). Floristic composition, plant uses and management practices in homegardens of San Rafael Coxcatlan, valley of Tehuacan-Cuicatlan, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 57: 39–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browning J A (1991). Conserving crop plant-pathogen coevolutionary processes in situ. In: Oldfield M L, Alcorn J B, eds. Biodiversity Culture, Conservation and Ecodevelopment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 59–85Google Scholar
  10. Carmona A, Casas A (2005). Management, phenotypic patterns and domestication of Polaskia chichipe (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley, Central Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 60: 115–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casas A, Cruse-Sanders J, Morales E, Otero-Arnaiz A, Valiente-Banuet A (2005). Maintenance of phenotypic and genotypic diversity in managed populations of Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) by indigenous peoples in Central Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation, DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-2934-7Google Scholar
  12. Ceccolini L (2002). The homegardens of Soqotra island, Yemen: an example of agroforestry approach to multiple land-use in an isolated location. Agroforestry Systems, 56: 107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coomes O T, Ban N (2004). Cultivated plant species diversity in home gardens of an Amazonian peasant village in Northeastern Peru. Economic Botany, 58: 420–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corlett J L, Dean E N, Grvetti L E (2003). Hmong gardens: botanical diversity in an urban setting. Economic Botany, 57: 365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cui J Y, Fu Y N, Guo H J, Chen A G (2000). Study on household-based agrobiodiversity assessment (HHABA) of homegarden in Daka, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, Supp. XII: 81–90 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Dao Z L, Chen W S, Guo H J, Duan H L, Duan J G (2000). Household-based agrobiodiversity assessment (HH-ABA) of house garden in Hanlong village of Baosha, east slope of Gaoligong Mountains. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, (Suppl. XII): 102–112 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Das T, Das A K (2005). Inventorying plants biodiversity in homegardens: a case study in Barak valley, Assam, Northeast India. Current Science, 89(1): 155–163Google Scholar
  18. Dash S S, Misra M K (2001). Studies on hill agro-ecosystems of three tribal villages on the Eastern Ghats of Orissa, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 86: 287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Clerck F A J, Negrreos-Castillo P (2000). Plant species of traditional Mayan homegardens of Mexico as analogs for multistrata agroforests. Agroforestry Systems, 48: 303–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Drew J A (2005). Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation. Conservation Biology, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00158.xGoogle Scholar
  21. Elias M, Mühlen G S, McKey D, Roa A C, Tohme J (2004). Genetic diversity of traditional South American landraces of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz): An analysis using microsatellites. Economic Botany, 58: 242–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandes E C M, Nair P K R (1986). An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, 21: 279–310Google Scholar
  23. Fu Y, Guo H, Chen A, Cui J, Padoch C (2003). Relocating plants from swidden fallows to gardens in Southwestern China. Economic Botany, 57: 389–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gajaseni J, Gajaseni N (1999). Ecological rationalities of the traditional homegarden system in the Chao Phraya Basin, Thailand. Agroforestry Systems, 46: 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gillespie A R, Bocanegra-Ferguson D M, Jimenez-Osornio J J (2004). The propagation of Ramon (Brosimum alicastrum Sw.; Moraceae) in Mayan homegardens of the Yucatan peninsula of Mexico. New Forests, 27: 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillespie A R, Knudson D M, Geilfus F (1993). The structure of four home gardens in the Petén, Guatemala. Agroforestry Systems, 24(2): 157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gobin A, Campling P, Deckers J, Feyen J (2001). Integrated land resources analysis with an application to Ikem (south-eastern Nigeria). Landscape and Urban Planning, 53: 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamilton A, Hamilton P (2006). Plant conservation: an ecosystem approach. London: EarthscanGoogle Scholar
  29. Hemp C (2005). The Chagga home gardens - relict areas for endemic Saltatoria species (Insecta: Orthopetera) on Mount Kilimanjaro. Biological Conservation, 125: 203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. High C, Shackleton C M (2000). The comparative value of wild and domestic plants in home gardens of a South African rural village. Agroforestry Systems, 48: 141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huai H, Pei S, Xu J (1998). Indigenous knowledge on “Banlangen” (Baphicacanthus cusia: Acanthaceae) of the Hani people. Ethnobotany, 10: 127–129Google Scholar
  32. Jose D, Shanmugaratnam N (1993). Traditional homegardens of Kerala: a sustainable human ecosystem. Agroforestry Systems, 24: 203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kehlenbeck K, Mass B L (2004). Crop diversity and classification of homegardens in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 63: 53–62Google Scholar
  34. Khoshbakht K, Hammer K (2005). Savadkouh (Iran) - an evolutionary centre for fruit trees and shrubs. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, DOI 10.1007/s10722-005-7467-8Google Scholar
  35. Kumar B M, Nair P K R (2004). The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems, 61: 135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lamont S R, Esbaugh W H, Greenberg A M (1999). Species composition, diversity, and use of homegardens among three Amazonian villages. Economic Botany, 1999, 53: 312–326Google Scholar
  37. Le H T, Hancock J F, Ton-That T, Ho P H (1999). Germplasm resources in Vietnam: major horticultural and industrial crops. HortScience, 34: 175–180Google Scholar
  38. Levasseur V, Olivier A (2000). The farming system and traditional agroforestry systems in the Maya community of San Jose, Belize. Agroforestry Systems, 49: 275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Los M D, Torre-Cuadros A L, Islebe G A (2003). Traditional ecological knowledge and use of vegetation in southeastern Mexico: a case study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12: 2455–2476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Major J, Clement C R, DiTommaso A (2005). Influence of market orientation on food plant diversity of farms located on Amazonian dark earth in the region of Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. Economic Botany, 59: 77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Méndez V E, Lok R, Somarriba E (2001). Interdisciplinary analysis of homegardens in Nicaragua: micro-zonation, plant use and socioeconomic importance. Agroforestry Systems, 51: 85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller R P, Nair P K R (2005). Indigenous agroforestry systems in Amazonia: from prehistory to today. Agroforestry Systems, DOI 10.1007/s10457-005-6074-1Google Scholar
  43. Nair P K R (2001). Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agroforestry Systems, 53: 239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Niñez V (1987). Household gardens: Theoretical and policy considerations. Agricultural Systems, 23:167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Padoch C, De Jong W (1991). The house gardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in an Amazonian agricultural system. Economic Botany, 45: 166–175Google Scholar
  46. Peyre A, Guidal A, Wiersum K F, Bongers F (2006). Dynamics of homegarden structure and function in Kerala, India. Agroforestry Systems, 66: 101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Plucknett D L, Smith N J H, Williams J T, Anishetty N M (1983). Crop germplasm conservation and developing countries. Science, 1983, 220: 163–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Primack R, Ji W Z (2000). A Primer of Conservation Biology. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  49. Rhoades R E (1991). World’s food supply at risk. National Geographic, 179 (4): 74–105Google Scholar
  50. Rico G V, Garcia-Franco J G, Chemas A, Puch A, Sima P (1990). Species composition, similarity and structure of Mayan homegardens in Tixpeual and Tixcanltuyub, Yucatan, Mexico. Economic Botany, 44: 470–487Google Scholar
  51. Schroth G, da Mota M S S, Lopes R, de Freitas A F (2004). Extractive use, management and in situ domestication of a weedy plant, Astrocaryum tucuma, in the central Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 202: 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schroth G, Lehmann J, Rodrigues M R L, Barros E, Macêdo J L V (2001). Plant-soil interactions in multistrata agroforestry in the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems, 53: 85–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shack KW, Grivetti L E, Dewey K G (1990). Cash cropping, subsistence agriculture, and nutritional status among mothers and children in lowland Papua New Guinea. Social Science & Medicine, 31(1): 61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sillitoe P (2003). The gender of crops in the Papua New Guinea highlands. In: Howard P L, ed.Women and plants. London, UK: Zed Books, 165–180Google Scholar
  55. Soini E (2005). Changing livelihoods on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: Challenges and opportunities in the Chagga homegarden system. Agroforestry Systems, 64: 157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ticktin T, Johns T (2002). Chinanteco management of Aechmea magdalenae: Implications for the use of TEK and TRM in management plans. Economic Botany, 56: 177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Torquebiau E (1992). Are tropical agroforestry homegardens sustainable? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 41: 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trinh L N, Watson J W, Hue N N, De N N, Minh N V, Chu P, Sthapit B R, Eyzaguirre P B (2003). Agrobiodiversity conservation and development in Vietnamese home gardens. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 97: 317–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wezel A, Bneder S (2002). Plant species diversity of homegardens of Cuba and its significance for household food supply. Agroforestry Systems, 57: 37–47Google Scholar
  60. Wezel W, Ohl J (2005). Does remoteness from urban centers influence plant diversity in homegardens and swidden fields?: A case study from the Matsiguenka in the Amazonian rain forest of Peru. Agroforestry Systems, 65: 241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiersum K F (1982). Tree gardening and Taungya on Java: examples of agroforestry techniques in the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems, 1: 53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson M (2003). Exchange, patriarchy and status: women’s homegardens in Bangladesh. In: Howard P L, ed. Women and plants. London, UK: Zed Books, 211–225.Google Scholar
  63. Zaldivar M E, Rocha O J, Castro E, Barrantes R (2002). Species diversity of edible plants grown in homegardens of Chibchan Amerindians from Costa Rica. Human Ecology, 30(3): 301–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Bioscience and BiotechnologyYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
  2. 2.Plantlife InternationalWiltshireUK

Personalised recommendations