Advertisement

Paleontological Journal

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 90–99 | Cite as

A new species of lesser panda Parailurus (Mammalia, Carnivora) from the Pliocene of Transbaikalia (Russia) and some aspects of ailurine phylogeny

  • M. V. Sotnikova
Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

A new species of the lesser panda, Parailurus baikalicus sp. nov., from the Pliocene of Transbaikalia is described. In contrast to the European taxa P. anglicus and P. hungaricus, it retains a primitive occlusal pattern of M1-M2, with a concave buccal outline, small mesostyle on M1, and undeveloped styles on M2. At the same time, the Transbaikalian panda is more advanced than other representatives of Parailurus in the upper molars with a reduced lingual cingulum and an enlarged paraconule, which is partially (M1) or completely (M2) separated from the protocone. This combination of primitive and advanced characters points to the separation of the Asian branch at the earliest stages of the genus development. The Transbaikalian lesser panda may represent a terminal form of this phylogenetic lineage.

Key words

Carnivora Ailuridae Parailurus new species Pliocene Transbaikalia Russia phylogeny stratigraphic range geographic distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Berzi, J. Mishaux, J. H. Hutchinson, and E. H. Lindsay, “The Arondelli Local Fauna, an Assemblage of Small Vertebrates from the Villafranchian Stage near Villafranca d'Asti, Italy”, Giom. Geol. 35 (2), 1–4 (1967).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, J. L. Gittleman, and A. Purvis, “Building Large Trees by Combining Phylogenetic Information: A Complete Phylogeny of the Extant Carnivora (Mammalia),” Biol. Rev. 74,143-175 (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. R. Bjork, “The Camivora of the Hagerman Local Fauna (Late Pliocene) of Southwestern Idaho,” Trans. Am. Philos. Sec. 60 (7), 1-54 (1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Z. Chen and G. Qi, “Human Remains and Mammals Accompanied in Xi Chuo, Yunnan,” Vertebr. Palasiat.16, 35-46 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. B. Dawkins, “On Ailurus anglicus, a New Carnivore from Red Crag,” Quart. J. Geol. Sec. London 44, 228231(1888).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. W. Dragoo and R. L. Honeycutt “Systematics of Mustelid-like Carnivores,” J. Mammal. 78 (2), 426-443 (1997).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. A. Erbajeva and N. V. Alekseeva, “Neogene Mammalian Sequence of the Eastern Siberia,” Mem. Trav. Inst. Montpellier. EPHE 21, 241-248 (1997).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. Fejfar, “the Lower Villafranchian Vertebrates from HajnA6ka near Fildkovo in Southern Slovakia,” Rozpr. Ostred. Ost. Geol. 30, 55-59 (1964).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Fejfar and M. Sabol, “Pliocene Carnivores (Carnivora, Mammalia) from Ivanovce and HajnASka (Slovakia),” Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg 246, 15-53 (2004).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. J. Flynn, M. A. Nedbal, J. W. Dragoo, and R. L. Honeycutt, “Whence the Red Panda?,” Mot. Phylogen. Evol. 17, 190-199 (2000).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. L. Fulton and C. Sfrobeck, “Molecular Phylogeny of the Arctoidea (Camivora): Effect of Missing Data on Supertree and Super Matrix Analyses of Multiple Gene Data Sets,” Mot. Phylogen. Evol. 41, 165-181 (2006).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Ginsburg, “Order Carnivora,” in The Miocene Land Mammals ofEurope (Pfeil, Munchen, 1999), pp. 109-149.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Ginsburg, J. Morales, D. Soria, and E. Herraez, “Discovery of an Ancestor of the Lesser Panda in the Middle Miocene of Madrid (Spain),” Earth and Planet. Sci. 325, 447-451 (1997).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. L. Gittleman, “Are the Pandas Successful Specialists or Evolutionary Failures,” BioScience 44 (7), 456-464 (1994).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. M. Hunt, “Biogeography of the order Carnivora,” in Carnivore Behavior, Ecology and Evolution (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1996), Vol. 2, pp. 485-541.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. P. Kalmykov, “A New Locality of the Hipparion Mammalian Fauna in Western Transbaikalia,” Byull. Komiss. Izuch. Chetvertich. Per., No. 58, 133-138 (1989).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. P. Kalmykov and E. N. Maschenko, “Cercopithecidae from the Pliocene of Transbaikalia (Parapresbytis eohanuman),” Vopr. Antropol. 88, 91-114 (1995).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. P. Kalmykov and VV. Shabunova, “the First Find of an Asiatic Raccoon (Ailurinae: Camivora, Mammalia) in Russia,” in Evolution of Life on the Earth (Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Tomsk, 2005), pp. 293-295 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Kormos, “Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Gattung Parailurus,” Mitt. Jahrb. Konig. Ungar. Geol. Anst. 30 (2), 1-39 (1935).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Kundrat, “The First Record of the Extinct Lesser Panda Parailurus on Eastern Slovakia,” Natura Carpatica 37, 211-214 (1996).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. N. Maschenko, “The Northernmost Primate of Asia,” Priroda, No. 11, 64-70 (1994).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. C. McKenna and S. K. Bell, “Classification of Mammals above the Species Level,” (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1997).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Morlo and M. Kundrat, “The First Carnivoran Fauna from the Ruscinium (Early Pliocene, MN15) of Germany,” Paleontol. Z. 75, 163-187 (2001).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. F. Newton, “On Some New Mammals from the Red and Norwich Crags,” Quart. J. Geol. Sec. London 46, 444-453 (1890).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. A. Repenning, T. R. Weasma, and G. R. Scott, “the Early Pleistocene (Latest Blancan Earliest Irvingtonian) Froman Ferry Fauna and History of the Glenns Ferry Formation, Southwestern Indaho. U.S.,” Geol. Surv. Bull. 2105, 1-86 (1995).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. S. Roberts and J. L. Gittleman, “Ailurus fulgens,” Mamm. Spec., No. 222,1-8 (1984).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    I. Sasagawa, K. Takahachi, T. Sakumoto, et al., “Discovery of the Extinct Red Panda Parailurus (Mammalia, Camivora) in Japan,” J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 23 (4), 895900 (2003).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Schlosser, “Parailurus anglicus and Ursus bockhi aus den Ligniten von Bar6th-Kopecz, Comitat Haromszek in Ungarn,” Mitt. Jahrb. Kohnig. Ungar. Geol. Anst. 13,66-95 (1899).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    N. Schmidt-Kittler, “Zur Stammesgeschichte der marderverwandten Raubtiergruppen (Musteloidea, Camivora),” Eel. Geol. Helv. 74, 753-801 (1981).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. P. Slattery and S. J. O'Brien, “Molecular Phylogeny of the Red Panda (Ailurus fulgens),” J. Hered. 86, 413-422 (1995).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. V. Sotnikova, “On the History of the Genus Gulo in Eurasia,” Tr. Zool. Just. 111, 65-73 (1982).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    M. V Sotnikova, “Pliocene Early Pleistocene Camivora Assemblages of Transbaikalian Area, Russia,” in Stratigraphy. Paleontology and Paleoenvironment of Pliocene Pleistocene of Transbaikalia and Interregional Correlations (Ulan-Ude, 2006), pp. 84-85.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. V Sotnikova and N. P. Kalmykov, “Pliocene Association of Predatory Mammals in the Udunga Locality (Western Transbaikalia),” in Paleogeography and Bios tratigraphy of the Pliocene and Anthropogene (Geol. Just. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 1991), pp. 146-159 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. C. Sowerby, “the Pandas or Cat-bears,” China J. 17, 296-299 (1932).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. J. Stuart, Pleistocene Vertebrates in the British Isles (Longman. London New York, 1982).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. H. Tedford and E. P. Gustafson, “First North American Record of the Extinct Panda Parailurus,” Nature 265, 621-623 (1977).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. H. Tedford, M. F. Skinner, R. W. Fields, et al., “Faunal Succession and Biochronology of the Arikareean through Hemphillian Interval (Late Oligocene through Earliest Pliocene Epochs) in North America,” in Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Geochronology and Biostratigraphy (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1987), pp. 153-210.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    E. Thenius, “Zur systematischen and phylogenetischen Stellung des BambusWren: Ailuropoda melanoleuca David (Camivora, Mammalia),” Z. Saugetierk. 44 (5), 286-305 (1979).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H. Tobien, “Die oberpliozane Saugerfauna von Wolfersheim-Wetterau,” Z. Geol. Ges. 104,191 (1953).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    I. Vislobokova, E. Dmitrieva, and N. Kalmykov, “Artiodactyls from the Late Pliocene of Udunga, Western Trans-Baikal, Russia,” J. Vertebr. Paleont. 15 (1), 146159 (1995a).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    I. Vislobokova, M. Sotnikova, and M. Erbajeva, “The Villafranchian Mammalian Faunas of the Asiatic Part of Former USSR,” Ital. J. Quatern. Sci. 8 (2), 367-376 (1995b).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    P. B. Vrana, M. C. Milinkovitch, J. R. Powell, and W C. Wheeler, “Higher Level Relationships of the Arctoid Camivora Based on Sequence Data and Total Evidence,” Mot. Phylogen. Evol. 3, 47-58 (1994).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    S. C. Wallace and X. Wang, “two New Carnivores from Unusual Forest Biota in Eastern North America,” Nature 431, 256-258 (2004).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    X. Wang, “New Cranial Material of Simocyon from China, and Its Implications for Phylogenetic Relationship to the Red Panda (Ailurus),” J. Vertebr. Paleonto1.17 (1), 184-198 (1997).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    M. Wolsan, “Phylogeny and Classification of Early European Mustelida (Mammalia: Carnivora),” Acta Thenot. 38 (4), 345-384 (1993).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    W C. Wozencraft, “Classification of the Recent Carnivora,” in Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, 1989), Vol. 1, pp. 569-593.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. R. Wyss and J. J. Flynn, “A Phylogenetic Analysis and Definition of the Camivora,” in Mammal Phylogeny (Springer, New York, 1993), pp. 32-52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK Nauka 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations