Mechanical and Barrier Properties of Films from Millet Protein Pennisetin
- 172 Downloads
Plastics are one of the most commonly used materials today in an immense range of applications. Since plastics originate from petroleum, which is not a renewable resource, we need to find alternatives to achieve environmentally sustainable goals. One of our most abundant renewable resources is cereals; wheat gluten is recognized as a replacement for synthetic plastics. Another cereal protein is pennisetin from pearl millet, which can grow in more arid areas and is therefore an important crop in times of climate change. In contrast to gluten, the material properties of pennisetin have as yet been relatively unexplored. This work evaluated the mechanical and barrier properties of pennisetin films, including three different plasticizers (glycerol only, glycerol/citric acid mixture, and glycerol/lactic acid/polyethylene glycol mixture). The films were cast from ethanol solutions. It was found that all of the three plasticizers resulted in approximately equal thermomechanical properties in the pennisetin films. However, the glycerol/citric acid mixture seemed to give more beneficial tensile and barrier properties. The advantage of this plasticizer mixture was believed to be due to the altered microstructure of the films. The material properties of pennisetin were found to be fully comparable to those of other cereal protein materials.
KeywordsBiopolymer Protein Pennisetin Plasticizer Material properties
The Swedish Agency for Innovation System (VINNOVA) is gratefully acknowledged for financial support to the project Renewable Functional Barriers.
- 1.Plastics Europe (2010). Available at: http://www.plasticseurope.org. Accessed 16 Aug 2010
- 2.FAOSTAT (2010). Available at: http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed 23 Sept 2010
- 3.J. Core, Agric. Res. 50, 20–21 (2002)Google Scholar
- 8.FAO (2010). Available at: http://www.fao.org. Accessed 16 Aug 2010
- 10.J.M. Aguilera, D.W. Stanley, in Microstructural Principles of Food Processing and Engineering (Springer, New York, 1999)Google Scholar
- 11.P.R. Shewry, A.S. Tatham, in Seed Proteins, ed. by P.R. Shewry, R. Casey (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999), p. 11Google Scholar
- 15.P.R. Shewry, in Pseudocereals and Less Common Cereals. Grain Properties and Utilization Potential, ed. by P.S. Belton, J.R.N. Taylor (Springer, Berlin, 2002), p. 1Google Scholar
- 16.L. Slade, H. Levine, J.W. Finley, in Protein quality and the effects of processing (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989), p. 9Google Scholar
- 17.J.K. Sears, J.R. Darby, in The Technology of Plasticizers (Wiley, New York, 1982), p. 35Google Scholar
- 19.J.A. Torres, in Protein functionallity in food system (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1994), p. 467Google Scholar
- 21.B.E. Ralston, N. Wochner, T.A. Osswald, in Global Plastics Environmental Conference (GPEC, Atlanta, 2006)Google Scholar