Advertisement

Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel

  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

This study analyses the relationship between Decent Work and Work Engagement in Portuguese and Brazilian higher education teachers/researchers, and aims to identify distinct emergent profiles resulting from the relationship between these variables. The sample is composed of 749 participants and data was collected online, in both Portugal and Brazil, using the Decent Work Questionnaire (DWQ) and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES). Results of multiple linear regressions showed that Decent Work dimensions positively predict Work Engagement in all its three dimensions (Vigor, Dedication, and Absorption). Profiles of workers regarding Decent Work dimensions were created using cluster analysis. Differences regarding Work Engagement and its respective dimensions were analyzed through a MANOVA. The results help organizations to apply new strategies and policies to promote higher levels of decent work, especially the Opportunities dimension to make their workers feel more engaged with their work. Limitations and directions for future research are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Change history

  • 20 January 2020

    In the article Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel (<ExternalRef><RefSource>https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09780-7</RefSource><RefTarget Address="10.1007/s11482-019-09780-7" TargetType="DOI"/></ExternalRef>) written by Graça, Pais, Mónico, dos Santos, Ferraro, &amp; Berger.

References

  1. Adil, A., & Kamal, A. (2016). Impact of psychological capital and authentic leadership on work engagement and job related affective well-being. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 31(1), 1–21.

  2. Allen, P. J., & Bennett, K. (2007). SPSS for the health and behavioural sciences. Melbourne: Thomson Learning.

  3. Altunel, M. C., Kocak, O. E., & Cankir, B. (2015). The effect of job resources on work engagement: A study on academicians in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.2.2349.

  4. Araújo, I., & Esteves, R. (2016). Engagement em docentes do ensino superior: uma abordagem exploratória. Enfermería Universitaria, 13(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reu.2016.03.006.

  5. Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596.

  6. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2007a). An organisational and social psychological perspective on burnout and work engagement. In M. Hewstone, H. A. W. Schut, J. B. F. De Wit, K. Van Den Bos, & M. S. Stroebe (Eds.), The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications (pp. 227–250). New York: Psychology Press.

  7. Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007b). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274.

  8. Bakker, A., Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., & Taris, T. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200.

  9. Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471.

  10. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235.

  11. Bholowalia, P., & Kumar, A. (2014). EBK-means: A clustering technique based on elbow method and k-means in WSN. International Journal of Computer Applications, 105(9), 17–24.

  12. Botham, K. A. (2018). An analysis of the factors that affect engagement of Higher Education teachers with an institutional professional development scheme. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1407664.

  13. Byrne, C. S., Peters, J. M., & Weston, J. W. (2016). The struggle with employees engagement: Measures and construct clarification using five samples. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(9), 1201–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000124.

  14. Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Marmier, V. (2014). The curvilinear effect of work engagement on employees’ turnover intentions. International Journal of Psychology, 51(2), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12131.

  15. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x.

  16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

  17. Corporation, I. B. M. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corporation.

  18. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957.

  19. De Vos, A., & Cambré, B. (2017). Career management in high-performing organizations: A set-theoretic approach. Human Resource Management, 56(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21786.

  20. Del’Olmo, F., & Darcanchy, M. (2016). O direito internacional contemporâneo e a OIT: Trabalho decente com inclusão social. Revista Internacional de Economía y Gestión de las Organizaciones, 3(2), 89–100.

  21. Dos Santos, N. R. (2017). Psychological approach of decent work: Recent developments. Paper presented at the II Leipzig – Évora Scientific Meeting in Psychology, Évora, Portugal (31 October).

  22. Duffy, R. D., Allan, B. A., England, J. W., Blustein, D. L., Autin, K. L., Douglass, R. P., et al. (2017). The development and initial validation of the Decent Work Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000191.

  23. Ferraro, T., Pais, L., & dos Santos, N. R. (2015). Decent work: An aim for all made by all. International Journal of Social Science, IV(3), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.20472/SS.2015.4.3.003.

  24. Ferraro, T., dos Santos, N. R., Pais, L., & Mónico, L. (2016). Historical landmarks of decent work. European Journal of Applied Business Management, 2(1), 77–96.

  25. Ferraro, T., dos Santos, N. R., Pais, L., & Moreira, J. M. (2017). Decent work and work motivation in lawyers: An empirical research. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 17(4), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2017.4.13908.

  26. Ferraro, T., Pais, L., dos Santos, N. R., & Moreira, J. M. (2018a). The Decent Work Questionnaire (DWQ): Development and a validation in two samples of knowledge workers. International Labour Review, 157(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12039.

  27. Ferraro, T., Pais, L., Moreira, J. M., & dos Santos, N. R. (2018b). Decent work and work motivation in knowledge workers: The mediating role of psychological capital. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(2), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9539-2.

  28. Ferraro, T., dos Santos, N. R., Moreira, J. M., & Pais, L. (2019). Decent work, work motivation, work engagement and burnout in physicians. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. Manuscript accepted for publication.

  29. Ferrer, J. L., & Morris, L. (2013). Engaging élitism: The mediating effect of work engagement on affective commitment and quit intentions in two Australian University Groups. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(4), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12020.

  30. García-Sierra, R., Fernández-Castro, J., & Martínez-Zaragoza, F. (2015). Work engagement in nursing: An integrative review of the literature. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12312.

  31. Ghai, D. (2002). Decent work: Concepts, models and indicators. Discussion paper (DP/139/2002): Education and outreach program. International Institute for Labour Studies (IILS). Geneva: IILS.

  32. Granrose, C. S., & Portwood, J. D. (1987). Matching individual career plans and organizational career management. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.2307/256156.

  33. Habe, K., & Tement, S. (2016). Flow among higher education teachers: A job demands-resources perspective. Horizons of Psychology, 25, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.20419/2016.25.442.

  34. Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001.

  35. Howell, D. C. (2013). Statistical methods for psychology (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

  36. International Labour Organization. (1999). Decent work. In Report of the Director-general at 87th session of International Labour conference, June. Geneva: International Labour Office.

  37. International Labour Organization. (2001). Perspectives on decent work: Statements by the ILO Director-general, January. Geneva: International Labour Office.

  38. International Labour Organization. (2008). Decent work: Some strategic challenges ahead. In International Labour conference, 97th session, report of the Director-general. Geneva: International Labour Office.

  39. Iyer, R. D. (2016). A study of work engagement among teachers in India. Global Business and Management Research, 8(1), 34–42.

  40. Johnson, M. J., & Jiang, L. (2016). Reaping the benefits of meaningful work: The mediating versus moderating role of work engagement. Stress and Health, 33(3), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2710.

  41. Joo, B. K., Lim, D. H., & Kim, S. (2016). Enhancing work engagement: The roles of psychological capital, authentic leadership, and work empowerment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1117–1134. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2015-0005.

  42. Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287.

  43. Kanai, A., & Wakabayashi, M. (2001). Workaholism among Japanese blue-collar employees. International Journal of Stress Management, 8(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009529314121.

  44. Kaur, S. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement: A literature review. IUPJournal of Organizational Behavior, 16(3), 161–175.

  45. Kulikowski, K., & Sedlak, P. (2017). Can you buy work engagement? The relationship between pay, fringe benefits, financial bonuses and work engagement. Current Psychology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9768-4.

  46. Lee, Y., Shin, H. Y., Park, J., Kim, W., & Cho, D. (2017). An integrative literature review on employee engagement in the field of human resource development: Exploring where we are and where we should go. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(4), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-017-9508-3.

  47. Leiter, M. P., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. London: Psychology Press.

  48. Machado, P. G. B., Porto-Martins, P. C., & Benevides-Pereira, A. M. T. (2014). Engagement no trabalho em profissionais de uma empresa de transporte público urbano. Psicologia Argumento, 32(79, Supl.2), 175–185.

  49. Maroco, J. (2010). Análise estatística com o PASW statistics. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber.

  50. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  51. Maslach, C., Leiter, M. P., & Jackson, S. E. (2012). Making a significant difference with burnout interventions: Researcher and practitioner collaboration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 296–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.784.

  52. Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2007). Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.09.002.

  53. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892.

  54. Messick, S. (1975). The standard problem: Meaning and values in measurement and evaluation. American Psychologist, 30(10), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.30.10.955.

  55. Narainsamy, K., & Van Der Westhuizen, S. (2013). Work related well-being: Burnout, work engagement, occupational stress and job satisfaction within a medical laboratory setting. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23(3), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2013.10820653.

  56. Paradnike, K., Endriulaitiene, A., & Bandzeviciene, R. (2016). Career self-management resources in contemporary career frameworks: A literature review. Organizaciju Vadyba, 76, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.7220/MOSR.2335.8750.2016.76.6.

  57. Pereira, S., dos Santos, N. R., & Pais, L. (2019). Empirical research on decent work: A literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53.

  58. Porto-Martins, P. C., Machado, P. G. B., & Benevides-Pereira, A. M. T. (2013). Engagement no trabalho: Uma discussão teórica. Fractal, 25(4), 629–644.

  59. Prieto, L., Salanova, M., Martínez, I., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). Extension of the job demands-resources model in the prediction of burnout and engagement among teachers over time. Psicothema, 20(3), 354–360.

  60. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988.

  61. Rodrigues, F., & Barroso, A. P. (2008). Avaliação do engagement nos docentes da Escola Superior de Saúde Dr. Lopes Dias. Bioanálise, 5, 34–39.

  62. Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Engaged at work and happy at home: A spillover–crossover model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9421-3.

  63. Rongen, A., Robroek, S. J., Schaufeli, W., & Burdorf, A. (2014). The contribution of work engagement to self-perceived health, work ability, and sickness absence beyond health behaviors and work-related factors. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(8), 892–897. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000196.

  64. Rowe, D. E. O., Bastos, A. V. B., & Pinho, A. P. M. (2011). Comprometimento e entrincheiramento na carreira: um estudo de suas influências no esforço instrucional do docente do ensino superior. RAC-Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 15(6), 973–992. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552011000600002.

  65. Sacks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169.

  66. Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217.

  67. Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Work engagement: What do we know and where do we go? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 14(1), 3–10.

  68. Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). General engagement: Conceptualization and measurement with the Utrecht General Engagement Scale (UGES). Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-017-0001-x.

  69. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248.

  70. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2009). The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale – Test manual (R. Angst, A. M. T. Benevides-Pereira, & P. C. Porto-Martins, trad.). Utrecht: Department of Social & Organizational Psychology. (Original manual published in 2003).

  71. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 10–24). New York: Psychology Press.

  72. Schaufeli, W., & Salanova, M. (2011). Work engagement: On how to better catch a slippery concept. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.515981.

  73. Schaufeli, W. B., Martínez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002a). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003.

  74. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002b). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326.

  75. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Van Rhenen, W. (2009). How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.595.

  76. Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kamiyama, K., & Kawakami, N. (2015). Workaholism vs. work engagement: The two different predictors of future well-being and performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9410-x.

  77. Simbula, S., Guglielmi, D., Schaufeli, W., & Depolo, M. (2013). The Italian validation of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Characterization of engaged groups in a sample of school teachers. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 268, 43–54.

  78. Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518.

  79. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

  80. Torp, S., Grimsmo, A., Hagen, S., Duran, A., & Gudbergsson, S. B. (2012). Work engagement: A practical measure for workplace health promotion? Health Promotion International, 28(3), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/das022.

  81. United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights, 10 December. New York: General Assembly of United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/60UDHR/bookleten.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2014.

  82. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 (A/RES/70/1). 69th Session of UN General Assembly. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.

  83. Wang, M., & Wanberg, C. R. (2017). 100 years of applied psychology research on individual careers: From career management to retirement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 546–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000143.

  84. Webster, E., Budlender, D., & Orkin, M. (2015). Developing a diagnostic tool and policy instrument for the realization of decent work. International Labour Review, 154(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2015.00017.x.

  85. Wicaksono, P., & Priyadi, L. (2016). Decent work in global production network: Lessons learnt from the Indonesian Automotive Sector. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 33(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae33-lf.

  86. Yim, O., & Ramdeen, K. T. (2015). Hierarchical cluster analysis: Comparison of three linkage measures and application to psychological data. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 11(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.11.1.p008.

  87. Yuan, Z., Li, Y., & Tetrick, L. E. (2015). Job hindrances, job resources, and safety performance: The mediating role of job engagement. Applied Ergonomics, 51, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.04.021.

Download references

Author information

all the authors contributed equally and significantly to the study.

Correspondence to Tânia Ferraro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared that there is no conflict of interests regarding the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Any underlying research materials related to this paper (for example data, samples or models) can be accessed. Requests for detailed information should be addressed to corresponding author (Tânia Ferraro: taniaferraro@gmail.com).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graça, M., Pais, L., Mónico, L. et al. Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel. Applied Research Quality Life (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09780-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Decent work
  • Decent work profiles
  • Work engagement
  • Academic personnel