Development and Application of a Short-Form Questionnaire for Assessing Spiritual, Religious and Personal Beliefs Related to Quality of Life (WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF) in Portugal
- 3 Downloads
The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the European Portuguese version of a short-form instrument for assessing spiritual, religious and personal beliefs related to quality of life (WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF). The European Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF was completed by a heterogeneous sample of 606 participants (72.4% female), with a mean age of 46.88 years, and with no religious affiliation or distinct religions (71.3% Catholic). In addition to the WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF, participants completed the Portuguese versions of the Brief Religious Coping questionnaire (Brief RCOPE), and the measure of orientation toward religion AGE UNIVERSAL I-E Scale-12. The European Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF showed satisfactory reliability (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.71 and 0.87 across domains). Confirmatory factor analysis corroborated the proposed five-domain structure. Convergent validity with the general facet on QoL was satisfactory for all domains. Spiritual QoL was significantly and positively associated with positive religious coping (r = .62, p < .001), as well as intrinsic (r = .62, p < .001) and extrinsic personal (r = .34, p < .001) religious orientation. Known-groups validity considering the strength of religious, spiritual and personal beliefs was demonstrated for Spiritual QoL, however, no significant differences were found regarding sex, age, and health status. These results offer promising support for the use of the WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF as a measure of spirituality, religion and personal beliefs related to quality of life (Spiritual QoL).
KeywordsQuality of life Reliability Validity WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allport, G. W., & Ross, M. J. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.Google Scholar
- Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Costa Catré, M. N. (2017). Qualidade de vida, espiritualidade, religiosidade e crenças pessoais. Um estudo com profissionais da educação [Quality of life, spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs: A study with Education professionals]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.Google Scholar
- Fleck, M., & Skevington, S. (2007). Explaining the meaning of the WHOQOL-SRPB. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 34, 67–69.Google Scholar
- Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2012). Censos 2011: XV Recenseamento Geral da População e V Recenseamento Geral da Habitação. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P.Google Scholar
- Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. International Scholarly Research Network. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/278730.
- Koenig, H. G., George, L. K., & Titus, P. (2004). Religion, spirituality, and health in medically ill hospitalized older patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 554–562.Google Scholar
- Kruizinga, R., Hartog, I. D., Jacobs, M., Daams, J. G., Scherer-Rath, M., Schilderman, J. B., … Van Laarhoven, H. W. (2016). The effect of spiritual interventions addressing existential themes using a narrative approach on quality of life of cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 25, 253–265.Google Scholar
- Moreira-Almeida, A., & Koenig, H. G. (2006). Retaining the meaning of the words religiousness and spirituality: A commentary on the WHOQOL SRPB group’s “a cross-cultural study of spirituality, religion, and personal beliefs as components of quality of life”. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 843–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. N. (1995). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Teixeira, A. (2012). Identidades religiosas em Portugal: Representações, valores e práticas [Religious identities in Portugal: Representations, values and practices]. Universidade Católica Portuguesa. Retrieved from http://www.agencia.ecclesia.pt/dlds/bo/Inqurito2011_Resumo.pdf
- Trevino, K. M., Pargament, K. I., Cotton, S., Leonard, A. C., Hahn, J., Caprini-Faigin, C. A., & Tsevat, J. (2007). Religious coping and physiological, psychological, social, and spiritual outcomes in patients with HIV/AIDS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal findings. AIDS and Behavior, 14, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WHOQOL SRPB Group (2002). WHOQOL Spirituality, Religiousness, and Personal Beliefs (SRPB) Field-Test Instrument. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/622.pdf
- World Health Organization (2002). WHOQOL-SRPB Users Manual. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/620.pdf