The Dual Model of Materialism: Success Versus Happiness Materialism on Present and Future Life Satisfaction
Materialism can influence life satisfaction both positively and negatively. We build on the dual model of materialism (Sirgy et al. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 349-366, 2013) to make the case that two dimensions of materialism—success and happiness—may influence life satisfaction differently. Success materialism (wealth and material possessions is a sign of success in life) may influence life satisfaction positively, whereas happiness materialism (wealth and material consumption is a sign of happiness in life) may influence life satisfaction negatively. Success materialism contributes to life satisfaction because it serves to boost economic motivation and causing a rise in future satisfaction with their standard of living, which in turn contributes to future life satisfaction. Happiness materialism, in contrast, influences life satisfaction adversely through two paths. One path involves dissatisfaction with standard of living, which in turn influences life satisfaction in a negative way. The other negative path involves dissatisfaction with other life domains; that is, happiness materialism detracts from life satisfaction by undermining satisfaction in other life domains such as financial life, family life, social life, etc. Data from a large-scale representative survey of 7599 German adults provided good support for the hypotheses and more.
KeywordsMaterialism Life satisfaction Future life satisfaction Economic motivation Standard of living
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors identified on this page conducted the research reported in this paper independently and without financial support from any source. Similarly, publication of the paper will not accrue any financial benefit to any of the authors either separately or together.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Belk, R. W. (1984). Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: Reliability, validity, and relationships to measures of happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 291–297.Google Scholar
- Burgard, T., Bosnjak, M., & Kasten, N. (2019). Moderators of panel conditioning effects. A meta-analysis. Presentation given at the 21st General Online Research Conference, TH Köln, March 8, 2019, Cologne. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2374
- Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.Google Scholar
- Dawson, S., & Bamossy, G. (1991). If we are what we have, what are we when we don't have? An exploratory study of materialism among expatriate Americans. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 6(6), 363–384.Google Scholar
- Lane, R. E. (2000). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Larsen, V., Sirgy, M. J., & Wright, N. D. (1999). Materialism: The construct, measures, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 3(2), 78–110.Google Scholar
- McClelland, D. C. (1967). Achieving society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- McClelland, D. C., Winter, D. G., & Winter, S. K. (1969). Motivating economic achievement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- OECD (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655.
- Richins, M. L. (1987). Media, materialism, and human happiness. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 352–356.Google Scholar
- Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D.-J., Larsen, V., & Wright, N. (1998). Satisfaction with material possessions and general well-being: The role of materialism. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction and Complaint, 11, 103–118.Google Scholar
- Sirgy, M. J., Gurel Atay, E., Webb, D., Cicic, M., Husic-Mehmedovic, M., Ekici, A., Herrmann, A., Hegazy, I., Lee, D.-J., & Johar, J. S. (2013). Is materialism all that bad? Effects on satisfaction with material life, life satisfaction, and economic motivation. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weiß, B., Das, M., Kapteyn, A., Bosnjak, M., & Schaurer, I. (in press). Open probability-based panels. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.Google Scholar
- Wright, N. D., & Larsen, V. (1993). Materialism and life satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Complaining Behavior, 6, 158–165.Google Scholar