The Happiness-Energy Paradox: Energy Use is Unrelated to Subjective Well-Being
Earth’s per capita energy use continues to grow, despite technological advances and widespread calls for reduction in energy consumption. The negative environmental consequences are well known: resource depletion, pollution, and global warming. However many remain reluctant to cut energy consumption because of the widespread, although, implicit, belief that a nation’s well being depends on its energy consumption. This article systematically examines the evidential support for the relationship between energy use and subjective well-being at the societal level, by integrating data from multiple sources, collected at multiple levels of government, and spanning four decades. This analysis reveals, surprisingly, that the most common measure of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, is unrelated to energy use -- whether measured at the national, state or county level. The nil relationship between happiness and energy use is reminiscent of the well-known Easterlin Paradox, however the causal mechanisms responsible to each remain in question. We discuss the possible causes for the Happiness-Energy paradox and potential policy implications.
KeywordsEnergy use Energy consumption Energy intensity of economy Sustainability Happiness Life satisfaction Subjective well-being (SWB)
We thank anonymous reviewer for pointing out that the relation between energy use and SWB is very similar to the relation between economic growth and SWB (i.e., the Happiness Paradox).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This material has not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication in another journal; all authors have been personally and actively involved in substantive work leading to the manuscript, and will hold themselves jointly and individually responsible for its content.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest declared.
- Ashkanasy, N. M. (2011). International happiness: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 23–29.Google Scholar
- BEA. (2014). Table 2.8.5. Personal consumption expenditures by major type of product, monthly. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Google Scholar
- Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2011). International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 6–22.Google Scholar
- Carter, J. (1977). Proposed energy policy. Public Broadcasting Service.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). (2003). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2009). Environmentally efficient well-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts. Human Ecology Review, 16, 114–123.Google Scholar
- Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2001). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Dumas, L. J. (1987). The overburdened economy: Uncovering the causes of chronic unemployment, inflation, and national decline. Berkeley: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. A. (1974): “Does economic growth improve the human lot?” in Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz, ed. by P. A. David and M. W. Reder, New York: Academic Press, Inc., vol. 89, 98–125.Google Scholar
- Energy Information Administration. (2008). Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
- Frank, R. H. (2005): “Does Absolute Income Matter,” in Economics and Happiness, ed. by L. Bruni and P. L. Porta, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Hopkins JS (2017). A small town in Pennsylvania has been ripped apart by a new gas plant. There are lessons to be learned from what’s happened in Jessup. City Lab, Nov 20.Google Scholar
- Jorgenson, A. K. (2014): “Economic development and the carbon intensity of human well-being,” Nature Climate Change.Google Scholar
- Kasser, T. (2003). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2017). Human well-being and climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(6), e485.Google Scholar
- MacKay, D. (2008) Sustainable energy-without the hot air, UIT Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Mazur, A. and E. Rosa (1974): “Energy and life-style.” Science (New York, NY), 186, 607.Google Scholar
- Oswald, A. (2014): “Keynote II,” 2014 well-being and Public Policy Conference at Hamilton College.Google Scholar
- Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., ... & Dubash, N. K. (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 151). IPCC.Google Scholar
- Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Smil, V. (2005) Creating the twentieth century: Technical innovations of 1867–1914 and their lasting impact. OUP Catalogue.Google Scholar
- Stanilov, K., & Sýkora, L. (2014). Confronting suburbanization: Urban decentralization in postsocialist central and Eastern Europe. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Stern, D. I., & Kander, A. (2012 Jan). The role of energy in the industrial revolution and modern economic growth. The Energy Journal., 1, 125–152.Google Scholar
- Stern, N., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., Crane, D., Cruickshank, S., Dietz, S., & Edmonson, N. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. London: HM treasury.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J., A. Sen, and J. Fitoussi (2009) Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available at www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.
- Veblen, T. (2005a): Conspicuous consumption, vol. 38, ePenguin, New York.Google Scholar
- Veblen, T. (2005b). The theory of the leisure class; an economic study of institutions. New York: Aakar Books.Google Scholar
- Veenhoven, R. (2014). Livability theory. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 3645–3647.Google Scholar
- Winfrey, E. M. V. (2013) Is more always better? The nonlinear relationship between energy consumption and well-being. Ph.D. thesis, Georgetown University.Google Scholar