Advertisement

Helping Others Helps? A Self-Determination Theory Approach on Work Climate and Wellbeing among Volunteers

  • Yandan Wu
  • Chunxiao LiEmail author
Article

Abstract

Participation in voluntary work is not sufficient to facilitate one’s psychological wellbeing and the motivation underlying this helping behavior may matter. Grounded in self-determination theory, this survey research examined the relationships among a supportive work climate, autonomous/controlled motivation, and subjective wellbeing (i.e., emotional exhaustion and life satisfaction). Volunteers (n = 2022) answered a survey form measuring the related study variables. The results of structural equation modeling indicated that a supportive work climate positively and negatively predicted autonomous and controlled motivation, respectively. Autonomous motivation was a negative predictor of emotional exhaustion and a positive predictor of life satisfaction, whereas controlled motivation positively predicted emotional exhaustion and negatively predicted life satisfaction. A supportive work climate had an indirect effect on emotional exhaustion and life satisfaction via autonomous/controlled motivation. These findings suggest that only when volunteers are motivated by autonomous forms of motivation will their subjective wellbeing be enhanced.

Keywords

Volunteering Motivation Autonomy support Emotional exhaustion Satisfaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would also like to thank research assistants and participants for their contribution to this research. We would also like to thank reviewers’ formative comments.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Social Science Fund [number 15BTY071].

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical standards were followed when conducted this research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516–1530.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M. H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628–646.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grouzet, F. M., Vallerand, R. J., Thill, E. E., & Provencher, P. J. (2004). From environmental factors to outcomes: a test of an integrated motivational sequence. Motivation and Emotion, 28(4), 331–346.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-004-2387-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Güntert, S. T., Strubel, I. T., Kals, E., & Wehner, T. (2016). The quality of volunteers’ motives: integrating the functional approach and self-determination theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156(3), 310–327.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2015.1135864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2009). Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory in health behaviour: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 275–302.  https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X373959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Haivas, S., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2012). Self-determination theory as a framework for exploring the impact of the organizational context on volunteer motivation: a study of Romanian volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1195–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011433041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haivas, S., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). Volunteer engagement and intention to quit from a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(9), 1869–1880.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardy, S. A., Dollahite, D. C., Johnson, N., & Christensen, J. B. (2015). Adolescent motivations to engage in pro-social behaviors and abstain from health-risk behaviors: a self-determination theory approach. Journal of Personality, 83(5), 479–490.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenkinson, C. E., Dickens, A. P., Jones, K., Thompson-Coon, J., Taylor, R. S., Rogers, M., … Richards, S. H. (2013). Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 773.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-773.
  19. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  20. Kulik, L. (2006). Burnout among volunteers in the social services: the impact of gender and employment status. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(5), 541–561.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kwok, Y. Y., Chui, W. H., & Wong, L. P. (2013). Need satisfaction mechanism linking volunteer motivation and life satisfaction: a mediation study of volunteers subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 1315–1329.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0204-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewig, K. A., Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Dollard, M. F., & Metzer, J. C. (2007). Burnout and connectedness among Australian volunteers: a test of the job demands–resources model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 429–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, C.-P., & Shi, K. (2003). The influence of distributive justice and procedural justice on job burnout. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(5), 677–684.Google Scholar
  24. Li, C., Wang, C. K. J., Pyun, D. Y., & Kee, Y. H. (2013). Burnout and its relations with basic psychological needs and motivation among athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(5), 692–700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.04.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, C., Wu, Y., & Kee, Y. H. (2016). Validation of the volunteer motivation scale and its relations with work climate and intention among Chinese volunteers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 124–133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  28. Millette, V., & Gagné, M. (2008). Designing volunteers’ tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction and performance: the impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 32(1), 11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9079-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreno-Jiménez, M. P., & Villodres, M. (2010). Prediction of burnout in volunteers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(7), 1798–1818.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00640.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  31. Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: a meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oostlander, J., Güntert, S. T., van Schie, S., & Wehner, T. (2014). Leadership and volunteer motivation: a study using self-determination theory. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 869–889.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701756946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramos, R., Güntert, S., Brauchli, R., Bauer, G., Wehner, T., & Hämmig, O. (2016). Exploring the interaction between volunteering status, paid job characteristics and quality of volunteers’ motivation on mental health. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 790–809.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9647-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Schie, S., Güntert, S. T., Oostlander, J., & Wehner, T. (2015). How the organizational context impacts volunteers: a differentiated perspective on self-determined motivation. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1570–1590.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9472-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: a review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011434558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu, Y., Li, C., & Khoo, S. (2016). Predicting future volunteering intentions through a self-determination theory perspective. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1266–1279.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9570-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ye, M., Li, L., Li, Y., Shen, R., Wen, S., & Zhang, J. (2014). Life satisfaction of adolescents in Hunan, China: reliability and validity of Chinese brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (BMSLSS). Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 515–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0438-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fujian Normal UniversityFuzhouChina
  2. 2.The Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  3. 3.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations