Gender-Based Measurement Invariance of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents
- 18 Downloads
The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA; Gullone and Taffe (Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 409–417, 2011)) across gender. A total of 1388 Chinese adolescents (48.1% males), ranging in age from 11 to 16 years (M = 12.9, SD = 1.09) were recruited from four Chinese middle schools and completed the ERQ-CA. The Cronbach’s α values, omega coefficients, and item-total correlations for the two subscales of the ERQ-CA indicated adequate internal consistency reliability. The results of confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis revealed that all configural, metric, scalar, and partial strict invariance models provided acceptable fit to the data. The result of latent means analysis demonstrated statistically non-significant differences between boys and girls. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the ERQ-CA displays appropriate measurement invariance across gender for Chinese youth of ages 11 to 16.
KeywordsERQ-CA Measurement invariance Gender difference Children and adolescent
The research reported in this article was supported by MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Youth Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (Grant No.15YJC190012), Hunan Provincial Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 16YBA199), and General Project of Hunan Provincial Social Science Achievement Review Committee (Grant No. XSPYBZZO27), and the General Project of 2016 Hunan Provincial Teaching Reform “The Empirical Study on College Students’ Scientific Literacy Cultivation under SRTP Model—Application of Major of Applied Psychology” was awarded to Dr. Yu Ling.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Buckley, M., & Saarni, C. (2014). Emotion regulation: implications for positive youth development. In M. J. Furlong, R. Gilman, & E. S. Huebner (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (2nd ed., pp. 99–115). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cabello, R., Salguero, J. M., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Gross, J. J. (2012). A Spanish adaptation of the emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
- Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., Levita, L., Libby, V., Pattwell, S. S., Ruberry, E. J., Soliman, F., & Somerville, L. H. (2010). The storm and stress of adolescence: insights from human imaging and mouse genetics. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 225–235.Google Scholar
- Cloitre, M., & Rosenberg, A. (2006). Sexual revictimization: Risk factors and prevention. In V. M. Follette & J. I. Ruzek (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral therapies for trauma (pp. 321–361). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2012). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.): Sage.Google Scholar
- Galvan, A., Hare, T. A., Parra, C. E., Penn, J., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2006). Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(25), 6885–6892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gratz, K. L. (2003). Risk factors for and functions of deliberate self-harm: an empirical and conceptual review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 192–205.Google Scholar
- Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion and emotion regulation. In L.A. Pervin, & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 525–552). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
- Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2002). Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 85–90.Google Scholar
- Wu, A. D., Li, Z., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(3), 1–26.Google Scholar