Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 197–220 | Cite as

Livability and Subjective Well-Being Across European Cities

  • Adam Okulicz-KozarynEmail author
  • Rubia R. Valente
Article

Abstract

This study documents for the first time the correlation between livability and subjective well-being (SWB) across European cities. Livability is measured with the popular Mercer Quality of Living Survey and correlates considerably with SWB, measured as place and life satisfactions. There are outliers, for instance: the “unlivable” but “happy” Belfast (fool’s paradise) and the “livable,” but “unhappy” Paris (fool’s hell). In addition, we find geographic patterns: while the Mercer index ranks higher Western cities, subjective well-being is higher in Northern cities. Smaller cities score higher on both livability and SWB, confirming thus the urban sociological theory of urban malaise while contradicting urban economic theory of city triumph.

Keywords

Satisfaction Happiness Subjective well-being Quality of life Urban quality of life Cities City rankings Livability Best places to live Mercer Economic theory Utility 

References

  1. Akerlof, G.A., & Shiller, R.J. (2010). Animal spirits: how human psychology drives the economy and why it matters for global capitalism (new in paper). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Albouy, D. (2008). Are big cities bad places to live? Estimating quality of life across metropolitan areas, Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  3. Ariely, D. (2009). Predictably irrational revised and expanded edition: the hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  4. Autor, D. (2010). Lecture 3: axioms of consumer preference and the theory of choice (Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCouseWare), http://ocw.mit.edu (Accessed 28 Dec 2017). License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA.
  5. Balducci, A., & Checchi, D. (2009). Happiness and quality of city life: the case of milan, the richest italian city. International Planning Studies, 14, 25–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin, D.J., Cooper, K., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M.S. (2017). Challenges in constructing a survey-based well-being index, Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, D.J., Cunningham, S., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M., Szembrot, N. (2015). Happiness and satisfaction are not everything: toward wellbeing indices based on stated preference. CEPR’s Policy Portal http://voxeu.org/article/asking-people-which-aspects-wellbeing-matter-most. Accessed 28 Dec 2017.
  8. Benjamin, D.J., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M.S., Szembrot, N. (2014). Beyond happiness and satisfaction: toward well-being indices based on stated preference. The American Economic Review, 104, 2698–2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blogs. (2016). Democracy in America, The Economist, published on January 6th. https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2016/01/dispassionate-analysis. Accessed 29 Dec 2017.
  10. Burckhardt, C.S., Anderson, K.L., et al. (2003). The quality of life scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton, M. (2014). Quality of place. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and Well-Being research (pp. 5312–5314): Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Rodgers, W.L. (1976). The quality of American life: perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Chatterji, A. (2013). London is the unhappiest place to live in Britain. New York: International Business Times.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, R. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deaton, A. (2013). Subjective well-being and policy: interview with Angus Deaton, Princeton University. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz3D-36RuLo. Accessed 29 Dec 2017.
  17. Diener, E. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28, 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dorahy, M.J., Lewis, C.A., Schumaker, J.F., Akuamoah-Boateng, R., Duze, M., Sibiya, T.E. (1998). A cross-cultural analysis of religion and life satisfaction. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 1, 37– 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Easterlin, R.A., McVey, L.A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., Zweig, J.S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22463–22468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finance and Economics. (2013). The Economist, published on April 27th. https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21576645-nobel-prizewinner-argues-overhaul-theory-consumer-choice. Accessed 29 Dec 2017.
  23. Finance and Economics. (2014). The Economist, published on December 4th. https://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21635524-new-paper-looks-how-economists-became-so-influential-power-self-belief. Accessed 29 Dec 2017.
  24. Fischer, C.S. (1995). The subcultural theory of urbanism: a twentieth-year assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 101(3), 543–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Florida, R. (2008). Who’s your city?. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Florida, R. (2014). The fall and (partial) rise of the rural creative class. Minneapolis: City Lab.Google Scholar
  27. Florida, R. (2016a). The difficulties of density. Despite its merits, in the U.S., density peaked in the 1950s and has declined since then. Minneapolis: City Lab.Google Scholar
  28. Florida, R. (2016b). The price of happiness in cities. Minneapolis: City Lab.Google Scholar
  29. Florida, R. (2016c). Richard Florida on the enduring legacy of Jane Jacobs. New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  30. Fourcade, M., Ollion, E., Algan, Y. (2015). The superiority of economists. Revista de Economí Institucional, 17, 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frank, R. (2012). The Darwin economy: liberty, competition and the common good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giannias, D., & Sfakianaki, E. (2014). Quality of life index. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5276–5280): Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Glaeser, E. (2011a). Cities, productivity, and quality of life. Science, 333, 592–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glaeser, E. (2011b). Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier and happier. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  35. Glaeser, E. (2014). Happiness is overrated. Boston: Boston Globe.Google Scholar
  36. Glaeser, E., Gottlieb, J., Ziv, O. (2014). Maximising happiness does not maximise welfare. New York: Vox.Google Scholar
  37. Glaeser, E.L., Gottlieb, J.D., Ziv, O. (2016). Unhappy cities. Journal of Labor Economics, 34, S129– S182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hudabiunigg, I. (2004). The otherness of Eastern Europe. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Jacobs, J. ([1961] 1993). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 18–36.Google Scholar
  42. Kahneman, D. (2000). Experienced utility and objective happiness: a moment-based approach. In Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) Choices, values and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A.B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R.H. (2006). Anomalies: utility maximization and experienced utility. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P.P., Sarin, R. (1997). Back to bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kasser, T. (2003). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kotkin, J. (2011). Why the ’Livable cities’ rankings are wrong. Forbes, 08.11.09.Google Scholar
  48. Krugman, P. (2012). Economics in the crisis. New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  49. Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., Royuela, V. (2007). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lederbogen, F., Kirsch, P., Haddad, L., Streit, F., Tost, H., Schuch, P., Wust, S., Pruessner, J.C., Rietschel, M., Deuschle, M., Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2011). City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature, 474(7352), 498–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liao, P. (2009). Parallels between objective indicators and subjective perceptions of quality of life: a study of metropolitan and county areas in Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 91, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maslow, A. ([1954] 1987). Motivation and personality, 3rd edn. White Plains: Longman.Google Scholar
  53. Mercer, W.M. (1999). Mercer Quality of Living Survey. Available at the website of Marsh Mercer Kroll, http://www.mercer.com/qualityoflivingpr#city-rankings. Accessed 28 Dec 2017.
  54. Michalos, A.C. (2014). Quality of life: two-variable theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5307–5309).Google Scholar
  55. Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities. Science, 167, 1461–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morais, P., Miguéis, V.L., Camanho, A.S. (2013). Quality of life experienced by human capital: an assessment of European cities. Social Indicators Research, 110, 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morrison, P. (2015). Capturing effects of cities on subjective wellbeing. In European Regional Science Association Conference, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  58. Myers, D. (1988). Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Naim, M. (2016). Economists still think economics is the best. Washington: The Atlantic.Google Scholar
  60. Ng, Y.-K. (1997). A case for happiness, cardinalism, and interpersonal comparability. The Economic Journal, 107, 1848–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2008). Społeczeństwo obywatelskie w Polsce na tle krajów ościennych. Zeszyty Naukowe WyŻszej Szkoły Bankowej w Poznaniu, 35–48.Google Scholar
  62. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2011). Geography of European life satisfaction. In Social indicators research, (Vol. 101 pp. 435–445).Google Scholar
  63. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2012). Income and well-being across European provinces. Social Indicators Research, 106(2), 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2013). City life: rankings (livability) versus perceptions (satisfaction). Social Indicators Research, 110, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2015a). Freedom and life satisfaction in transition. Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 37, 143–164.Google Scholar
  66. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2015b). Happiness and place why life is better outside of the city. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2016). Happiness research for public policy and administration. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(2), 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., Holmes, O. IV, Avery, D.R. (2014). The subjective Well-Being political paradox: Happy welfare states and unhappy liberals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1300–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. O’Sullivan, A. (2009). Urban economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  70. O’Sullivan, F. (2016). Rating Europe’s most and least happy cities. Minneapolis: City Lab.Google Scholar
  71. Oswald, A.J., & Wu, S. (2009). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human Well-Being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327, 576–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing–a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Park, R.E., Burgess, E.W., Mac Kenzie, R.D. ([1925] 1984). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pines, D. (1972). The equilibrium utility level and city size: a comment. Economic Geography, 48, 439–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. (2005). Climate and happiness. Ecological Economics, 52, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schkade, D., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9, 340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schneider, M. (2005). The quality of life in large American cities: Objective and subjective social indicators. Citation Classics from Social Indicators Research, 26, 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: why more is less. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
  79. Sen, A. (1977). Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6, 317–344.Google Scholar
  80. Senlier, N., Yildiz, R., Akta, E. (2009). A perception survey for the evaluation of urban quality of life in Kocaeli and a comparison of the life satisfaction with the European cities. Social Indicators Research, 94, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shiller, R.J. (2015). Irrational exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Simmel, G. (1903). The metropolis and mental life. The Urban Sociology Reader, 23–31.Google Scholar
  83. Sirgy, M.J. (2002). The psychology of quality of life Vol. 12. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: is there any evidence of satiation? The American Economic Review, 103, 598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Available at www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr. Accessed 28 Dec 2017 .
  87. Thaler, R. (2012). The winner’s curse: paradoxes and anomalies of economic life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  88. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Tönnies, F. ([1887] 2002). Community and society. Mineola: DoverPublications.com.Google Scholar
  90. Union, E. (2004). Treaty establishing a constitution for Europe. Official Journal of the European Union, 310, 16.Google Scholar
  91. Valente, R.R., & Berry, B.J. (2016). Dissatisfaction with city life? Latin America revisited. Cities, 50, 62–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Veenhoven, R. (2008). Sociological theories of subjective well-being. In Eid, M., & Larsen, R. (Eds.) The science of subjective well-being: a tribute to Ed Diener (pp. 44–61). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  95. Veenhoven, R. (2014a). Livability Theory. In A.C. Michalos (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  96. Veenhoven, R. (2014b). Sociology’s blind eye for happiness. Comparative Sociology, 13, 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34, 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2013). The Easterlin illusion: economic growth does go with greater happiness. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 43983.Google Scholar
  99. von Wirth, T., Grêt-Regamey, A., Stauffacher, M. (2015). Mediating effects between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life: testing specific models for safety and access. Social Indicators Research, 122, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wheeler, B.W., White, M., Stahl-Timmins, W., Depledge, M.H. (2012). Does living by the coast improve health and wellbeing?. Health & Place, 18 (5), 1198–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. White, M.P., Alcock, I., Wheeler, B.W., Depledge, M.H. (2013). Coastal proximity health and well-being: results from a longitudinal panel survey. Health & Place, 23, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wkeziak-Bialowolska, D. (2016). Quality of life in cities–empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities, 58, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zafirovski, M. (2014). Rational choice requiem: the decline of an economic paradigm and its implications for sociology. The American Sociologist, 45, 432–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zukin, S. (2009). Naked city: the death and life of authentic urban places. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Policy & AdministrationRutgers UniversityCamdenUSA
  2. 2.Vistula UniversityWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Marxe School of Public and International AffairsBaruch College, CUNYNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations