Do Involuntary Longer Working Careers Reduce Well-being?
- 107 Downloads
This study examines the impact of working at older age on the individual’s overall well-being. The paper uses microdata from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), and it controls for individual heterogeneity and for changes in the level of well-being during retirement. On average, older workers do not significantly differ from retirees regarding their life satisfaction level. In addition, this study takes into account the worker’s perceived freedom of choice in the decision to work longer (voluntary or forced). In this way, this research identifies a group of workers (“involuntary workers”) who experience a significantly lower level of well-being when continuing to work. After retiring, this group reports greater satisfaction with their lives but continues to suffer from being previously involuntarily employed. As result, these workers continue to be less satisfied with their lives than those who were voluntary workers. These findings have an important implication for the debate on longer working careers. The worker’s perceived freedom of choice in the decision to continue working is a determining factor in the individual well-being of older persons.
KeywordsLife satisfaction Retirement Involuntary employment Longer working careers Aging
JEL ClassificationJ26 J28 I31
This paper uses data from Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Waves 2, 4 and 5 (DOIs: https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w2.260, https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w4.111, https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w5.100). The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the FP5 (QLK6-CT-2001-00360), FP6 (SHARE-I3: RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE: CIT5-CT-2005-028857) and FP7 (SHARE-PREP: N°211909, SHARE-LEAP: N°227822, SHARE M4: N°261982). Additional funding from the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01_AG09740-13S2, P01_AG005842, P01_AG08291, P30_AG12815, R21_AG025169, Y1-AG-4553-01, IAG_BSR06-11, OGHA_04-064), the German Ministry of Education and Research and from various national funding sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org). This research is supported by the Special Research Fund of Ghent University and the National Bank of Belgium.
- Atchley, R. C. (1976). The sociology or retirement. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Börsch-Supan, A., & Alcser, K. H. (2005). Health, ageing and retirement in Europe: first results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA).Google Scholar
- Capéau, B., Decoster, A., & Dekkers, G. (2016). Estimating and simulating with a random utility random opportunity model of job choice presentation and application to Belgium. International Journal of Microsimulation, 9(2), 144–191.Google Scholar
- Charles, K. K. (2004). Is retirement depressing?: Labor force inactivity and psychological well-being in later life. In Polachek, S. W. (Eds.), Accounting for Worker Well-Being. Research in Labor Economics, Volume 23. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 269–299.Google Scholar
- Crowley, J. E. (1985). Longitudinal effects of retirement on men’s psychological and physical well-being. In H. S. Parnes, J. E. Crowley, R. J. Haurin, L. J. Less, W. R. Morgan, F. L. Mott, & G. Nestel (Eds.), Retirement among American men (pp. 147–173). Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Eurofound. (2013). Quality of life in Europe: subjective well-being. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2012). White paper: an agenda for adequate, safe and sustainable pensions. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Ho, S., Woo, J., Lau, J., Chan, S., Yuen, Y., Chan, Y., & Chi, I. (1995). Life satisfaction and associated factors in older Hong Kong Chinese. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43(3), 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07331.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malter, F., & Börsch-Supan, A. (Eds.) (2013). SHARE wave 4: innovations & methodology. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, M., Halpern, D., & Layard, R. (2014). Wellbeing and policy - full report. London: Legatum Institute.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2013a). How’s life?: measuring well-being. Paris: OECD publishing.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2013b). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2016). OECD employment outlook 2016. Paris: OECD publishing.Google Scholar
- Potočnik, K., & Sonnentag, S. (2013). A longitudinal study of well-being in older workers and retirees: the role of engaging in different types of activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 497–521.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.Google Scholar
- Von Humboldt, S., Leal, I., & Pimenta, F. (2014). Living well in later life: the influence of sense of coherence, and socio-demographic, lifestyle and health-related factors on older adults’ satisfaction with life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(3), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9262-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar