Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 909–926 | Cite as

Economic Poverty and Happiness in Rural Ecuador: the Importance of Buen Vivir (Living Well)

  • Fernando García-Quero
  • Jorge Guardiola
Research Paper

Abstract

This research paper addresses the endemic dimensions of having or not having a good life using a concept of poverty based on self-reported subjective well-being. We build a subjective well-being poverty (SWBP) line and compare it with two income poverty (IP) lines. The endemic dimension comes from rural Ecuador and the indigenous happiness idea of Buen Vivir (Living Well), which has been the focus of growing attention in the scientific and the political arena. Discrepancies between SWBP and IP are deeply explored building models that explain SWBP with IP, as well as control variables and Buen Vivir related variables. We show that income poor households are more likely to be poor in terms of their reported subjective well-being. However, households that grow their own food and are in an indigenous community are less likely to report to be subjective well-being poor. The results suggest that low SWBP values in contrast with high IP may be explained by idiosyncratic components of the Buen Vivir philosophy. The components of the Buen Vivir ethos related to SWBP give rise to the idea of building multidimensional concepts of poverty based on what ethnic people consider to be good or bad for their specific way of life. In a general context, our study raises the importance of considering poverty and its dimensions taking into account the endemic factors of specific groups of people and cultures. That is, to take into account what is important for their lives.

Keywords

Happiness Poverty Buen Vivir Latin America Food sovereignty 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Institute of Population and Local Sustainable Development (PYDLOS by the Spanish acronym) at Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador, for assistance and access to the database. Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness (Project ECO2012-32189) and the Government of Andalucía (Project P11-SEJ-7039 and Project P12-SEJ-1436) is also acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank useful comments from Mariano Rojas, Mònica Guillén Royo, Martin Binder. The comments made by four anonymous referees and the editor of the Journal are also appreciated. Usual disclaimer applies. In addition, the first author would like to thank the Latin American Centre (LAC) at the University of Oxford for its support during the review process that took place during his research stay in the centre. A particular thanks to Dr. Diego Sánchez-Ancochea, director of LAC for his hospitality.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acosta, A. (2011). Extractivismo y neoextractivismo. Dos caras de la misma maldición. In M. Lang & D. Monkrani (Eds.), Más allá del desarrollo (pp. 83–118). Quito: AbyaYala.Google Scholar
  2. Acosta, A. (2012). Buen Vivir/SumakKawsay. Una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Quito: AbyaYala.Google Scholar
  3. Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albó, X. (2010). Suma Qamaña, Convivir Bien, ¿Cómo medirlo?’. Diálogos, 1, 54–64, file:///C:/Users/Asus%20PC/Downloads/Art%C3%ADculo%20Xavier%20Alb%C3%B3.pdf).Google Scholar
  5. Albrecht, G., Sartore, G. M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A., & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(1), S95–S98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ascarrunz, B. (2011). El Vivir Bien como sentido y orientación de políticas públicas. In: Farah y Vasapollo Farah H. I. and Vasapollo, L. (coord.) Vivir bien: ¿Paradigma no capitalista? Università di Roma Sapienza CIDES-UMSA: La Paz. Pp. 424–437.Google Scholar
  7. Bartra, A. (2010). Campesindios. Aproximaciones a los campesinos de un continente colonizado. Bolivia: ipdrs / cides-umsa.Google Scholar
  8. Bertoni, M. (2015). Hungry today, unhappy tomorrow? Childhood hunger and subjective wellbeing later in life. Journal of Health Economics, 40, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binder, M., & Blankenberg, A. K. (2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137, 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcuta. Social Indicators Research, 55, 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolivian Constitution. (2009). http://bit.ly/1nuhqhW.
  12. Borghesi, S., & Vercelli, A. (2012). Happiness and Health: Two Paradoxes. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3), 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Camfield, L., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2009). Wellbeing research in developing countries: Reviewing the role of qualitative methods. Social Indicators Research, 90(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chambers, R. (2006). What is Poverty? Concepts and Measures. International Poverty Centre (IPC): UNDP.Google Scholar
  17. Correa, R. (2012). Ecuador's Path. New Left Review, 77, 89–104.Google Scholar
  18. Dávalos, P. (2008) Reflexiones sobre el SumakKawsay (el Buen Vivir) y las teorías del desarrollo. Bol. ICCI 113 (English version; http://bit.ly/OB6LXh).
  19. De la Torre, L. M., & Sandoval Peralta, C. (2004). La reciprocidad en el mundo Andino. Abya-Yala: Quito.Google Scholar
  20. De Souza Santos, B. (2009). Una epistemología del Sur. México: CLACSO Coediciones. Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
  21. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, J. R. (2008). Gross National Happiness as an answer to the Easterlin Paradox? Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluations, while psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ecuadorian Constitution (2008). http://bit.ly/1mgUnKw.
  27. Edward, P. (2006). The Ethical Poverty Line: a moral quantification of absolute poverty. Third World Quarterly, 27(2), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ENEMDU (2013). Ecuadorian Employment, Underemployment and Unemployment Survey. http://www.siise.gob.ec/siiseweb/
  29. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2013). Happiness economics. SERIEs, 4(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Gowdy, J. M. (2007). Environmental Degradation and Happiness. Ecological Economics, 60, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham, C. (2010). Happiness around the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Frustrated Achievers: Winners, Losers, and Subjective Well Being in New Market Economies. Journal of Development Studies, 38, 100–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Graham, C., Chattioadgyay, S., & Picon, M. (2010). The Easterlin and other paradoxes: why both sides of the debate might be correct. In E. Dieder, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Guardiola, J., & García-Quero, F. (2014). Buen Vivir (living well) in Ecuador: Community and environmental satisfaction without household material prosperity? Ecological Economics, 107, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guardiola, J., González-Gómez, F., García-Rubio, M. A., & Lendechy-Grajales, A. (2012). Higher income equal higher happiness in every society? The case of the Mayan People. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gudynas, E. (2011). Buen Vivir: today's tomorrow. Development, 54(4), 441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gudynas, E., & Alayza, A. (2012). Postextractivismo: transiciones hacia las alternativas al desarrollo. In N. Velardi & M. Z. Polatsik (Eds.), Anales Seminario Internacional Desarrollo territorial y extractivismo: Luchas y alternativas en la Región Andina. Cuzco: Centro Bartolomé de Las Casas.Google Scholar
  39. Guillen-Royo, M. (2016). Sustainability and Wellbeing: Human-scale development in practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Guillen-Royo, M., & Velazco, J. (2012). Happy villages and Unhappy slums? Understanding Happiness determinants in Peru. In H. Selin & S. G. Davey (Eds.), Happiness across cultures (pp. 253–270). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Guillén-Royo, M., Guardiola J. & García-Quero, F. (2017) Sustainable development in times of economic crisis: A needs-based illustration from Granada (Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 267–276.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hargreaves, J. R., Morison, L. A., Gear, J. S., Makhubele, M. B., Porter, J. D., Busza, J., & Pronyk, P. M. (2007). “Hearing the voices of the poor”: assigning poverty lines on the basis of local perceptions of poverty. A quantitative analysis of qualitative data from participatory wealth ranking in rural South Africa. World Development, 35(2), 212–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Helliwell, J. (2001). Social capital, the economy and well-being. In K. Banting, A. Sharpe, F. St-Hilaire, E. D. A. Sharpe, & D. K. Banting (Eds.), The review of economic performance and social progress 2001: The Longest Decade: Canada in the 1990s (pp. 43–60). Montreal: The Institute for Research and Public Policy. http://www.csls.ca/repsp/1/03-helliwell.pdf.
  44. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-Being, Social Capital and Public Policy: What's New? The Economic Journal, 116(510), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., & Cubillo-Guevara, A. P. (2013). Seis debates abiertos sobre el sumak kawsay. ÍCONOS, 48, 25–40.Google Scholar
  47. Houtart, F. (2011). El concepto de Sumak kawsay (buen vivir) y su correspondencia con el bien común de la humanidad. Rev. Filos., 69, 7–33.Google Scholar
  48. INEC (2010). Spanish acronym for Ecuadorian National Statistics Institute. VII Censo de Población y VI de Vivienda 2010, (http://bit.ly/U3Fhfm).
  49. International Poverty Centre. (2006). What is Poverty?: Concepts and Measures. Brazilia: International Poverty Centre.Google Scholar
  50. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Kingdon, G. G., & Knight, J. (2006). Subjective well-being poverty vs. income poverty and capabilities poverty? The Journal of Development Studies, 42(7), 1199–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. New York and London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  53. Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human-scale development - conception, application and further reflection. New York: The Apex Press.Google Scholar
  54. Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is Volunteering Rewarding in Itself? Economica, 75, 39–59.Google Scholar
  55. Ramirez Gallego R. (2011). La felicidad como medida del buen vivir en Ecuador. SENPLADES.Google Scholar
  56. Ravallion, M. (2012). Poor, or just feeling poor? On Using Subjective Data on Measuring Poverty. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 5963.Google Scholar
  57. Ravallion, M., Himelein, K., & Beegle, K. (2013). Can subjective questions on economic welfare be trusted? evidence for three developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 6726.Google Scholar
  58. Rehdanz, K., & Maddison, D. J. (2008). Local Environmental Quality and Life Satisfaction in Germany. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 787–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rojas, M. (2008). Experienced poverty and income poverty in Mexico: A subjective well-being approach. World Development, 36(6), 1078–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rojas, M. (2011). Poverty and Psychological Distress in Latin America. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rojas, M. (2014). El Estudio Científico de la Felicidad. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  62. Rojas, M. (2015). Poverty and Well-being Deprivation. In W. Glatzer, V. Moller, L. Camfield, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global Handbook of Well-being and Quality of Life. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Sen, A. (1987). On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. SENPLADES (2009). Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir del Ecuador 2009–2013. SENPLADES, Quito, (http://bit.ly/1jsXOwF).
  65. SENPLADES (2013). PLAN Nacional para el Buen Vivir del Ecuador 2013–2017. SENPLADES, Quito, (http://bit.ly/1pauwkz).
  66. Suárez-Varela, M., Guardiola, J., & González-Gómez, F. (2014). Do pro-environmental behaviors and awareness contribute to improve subjective wellbeing? Applied Research in Quality of Life., 11(2), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Torrez, M. (2001). Estructura y proceso de desarrollo del Qamaña. Espacio de bienestar. Pacha, 6, 45–67.Google Scholar
  68. Tortosa, J.M. (2012). SumakKawsay, Buen Vivir, ¿alternativa al desarrollo? http://bit.ly/PzsUGK.
  69. Van Praag, B., & Baarsma, B. E. (2005). Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. The Economic Journal, 115(500), 224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vanhulst, J., & Beling, A. E. (2014). Buen vivir: Emergent discourse within or beyond sustainable development? Ecological Economics, 101, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Waldmüller, J. M. (2014). BuenVivir, SumakKawsay, 'Good Living': An Introduction and Overview. Alternautas, 1, 17–28.Google Scholar
  72. Webb, D. (2009). Subjective Wellbeing on the Tibetan Plateau: An Exploratory Investigation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 753–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Welsch, H. (2002). Preferences Over Prosperity and Pollution: Environment Valuation Based on Happiness Surveys. Kyklos, 55(4), 473–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Campus de la Cartuja sin númeroUniversidad de GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations