Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 327–341 | Cite as

Political Participation and Wellbeing in the Netherlands: Exploring the Causal Links

  • André PirralhaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Does political participation make individuals more satisfied with their lives? Scholars of classical philosophy and participatory democracy suggest that participation in political activities is indeed a fundamental tenet of individual wellbeing. However, even though political participation is one of the most intensively studied topics in political science for decades, the relationship with individual wellbeing only recently started to gather some attention. So far, the existing empirical research has come to inconclusive results. In this study, we first re-examine the theoretical relationships between political participation and wellbeing. Secondly, using panel data from the Netherlands, we assess empirically the causal relations between taking part in political activities and individual life satisfaction. We give special attention to the role of political efficacy in this relationship. Employing structural equation modeling and correcting for measurement error, we find no evidence of a substantive effect of political participation on life satisfaction.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Political participation Political efficacy Causality Citizenship 

References

  1. Abramson, P. R., & Aldrich, J. H. (1982). The decline of electoral participation in America. The American Political Science Review, 76, 502–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. Hoboken: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470146316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, S., Kaase, M., et al. (1979a). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, S., Farah, B., & Heunks, F. (1979b). Personal dissatisfaction. In S. Barnes, M. Kaase, et al. (Eds.), Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E. (Ed.). (2009). The science of wellbeing: The collected works of Ed Diener. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Dutt, A., & Radcliff, B. (Eds.). (2009). Happiness, economics and politics: Towards a multi-disciplinary approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Finkel, S. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: a panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finkel, S. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: evidence from a West German panel. Journal of Politics, 49(02), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flavin, P., & Keane, M. (2012). Life satisfaction and political participation: evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helliwell, J. F. (2006). Well-being, social capital and public policy: what’s new? The Economic Journal, 116, C34–C45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ikeda, K., Kobayashi, T., & Hoshimoto, M. (2008). Does political participation make a difference? The relationship between political choice, civic engagement and political efficacy. Electoral Studies, 27, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Inglehart, R. (2006). Democracy and happiness: What causes what?. Paper presented at Conference on Human Happiness. Notre Dame University, October 22 – 24.Google Scholar
  17. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2005). LISREL 8.57.. Lincolnwood: Scientific SoftwareInternational, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Klandermans, B. (1989). Does happiness soothe political protest? The complex relation between discontent and political unrest. In R. Veenhoven (Ed.), How harmful is happiness? Consequences of enjoying life or not. Rotterdam: Universitaire Pers Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  20. Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. The American Political Science Review, 85, 1407–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). The optimal level of well-being: Can we be too happy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346–360.Google Scholar
  22. Pacek, A. C. (2009). Politics and happiness: An empirical ledger. In A. K. Dutt & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Pacheco, G., & Lange, T. (2010). Political participation and life satisfaction: a cross-European analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(10), 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parry, G. (ed.) (1972). The idea of political participation. In Participation in politics. Parry, G (ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Peterson, C. (1999). Personal control and well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Pichler, F., & Wallace, C. (2009). Social capital and social class in Europe: the role of social networks in social stratification. European Sociological Review, 25(3), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Revilla, M., & Saris, W. E. (2012). A comparison of the quality of questions in a face-to-face and a web survey. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/eds007.Google Scholar
  29. Saris, W. E. (2008). Alternative measurement procedures and models for political efficacy. Unpublished manuscript. Barcelona: ESADE.Google Scholar
  30. Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schultz, W. (2005). Political efficacy and expected political participation among lower and upper secondary students: A comparative analysis with data from the IEA civic education study. Paper for the ECPR General Conference in Budapest, September 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  34. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Political participation and procedural utility: an empirical study. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teorell, J. (2006). Political Participation and three theories of democracy: a research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 787–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In J. van Deth, A. Westholm, & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Citizenship, involvement in European democracies. A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Van der Veld, W., Saris, W. E., & Satorra, A. (2008). Judgement rule aid for structural equation models version 3.0.4 beta.Google Scholar
  38. van Deth, J.W. (2001). The proof of the pudding: social capital, democracy, and citizenship. Paper presented at the ESF/EURESCO conference Social Capital — Interdisciplinary Perspectives — a Euro Conference, Exeter, September 15–20.Google Scholar
  39. van Deth, J., & Maloney, W. (Eds.). (2011). New participatory dimensions in civil society: Professionalization and individualized collective action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  42. Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Warren, M. (1992). Democratic theory and self-transformation. The American Political Science Review, 86, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. S. (2011). The link between voting and life satisfaction in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(4), 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat Pompeu Fabra – Research and Expertise Centre for Survey MethodologyBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations