Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 185–204 | Cite as

Gender Differences in the Relationship Between Domain-Specific and General Life Satisfaction: A Study in Iran and Serbia

  • Veljko JovanovićEmail author
  • Mohsen Joshanloo
  • Dragan Đunda
  • Ali Bakhshi
Article

Abstract

Although the associations between satisfaction with life domains (DS) and global life satisfaction (GLS) are well-documented, the roles of culture and gender in this relationship remain largely unknown. The main aim of the present study was to examine the relationships between DS and GLS among women and men in Iran and Serbia, after establishing measurement invariance across groups. In addition, we investigated gender and country differences in DS and GLS. The sample was comprised of 623 undergraduate students from Iran and Serbia. Participants completed measures of GLS and satisfaction with the following seven domains: standard of living, health, achieving in life, relationships, safety, community-connectedness, and future security. Satisfaction with achieving in life and standard of living had similar unique contributions to GLS among Iranian women and men, whereas satisfaction with achieving in life was a stronger predictor of GLS than satisfaction with standard of living among Serbian women and men. These two domains were the only significant predictors of GLS in Serbian women and men, whereas gender-specific predictors of GLS were found in Iran. The results demonstrated that students in Serbia reported higher GLS and DS than Iranian students. Furthermore, we found that women reported higher GLS and DS than men did, with the exception of satisfaction with standard of living for which no significant gender differences were found. The present study provides new insights into the role of gender in the relationship between DS and GLS across cultures.

Keywords

Life satisfaction Domain satisfaction Gender Culture Measurement invariance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant No. 179006).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonini, A. (2008). Cross-national variation in individual life satisfaction: Effects of national wealth, human development, and environmental conditions. Social Indicators Research, 87, 223–236.Google Scholar
  2. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132.Google Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.Google Scholar
  6. Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., & Aaro, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1307–1317.Google Scholar
  7. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.Google Scholar
  8. Cummins, R. A. (1997). Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – Adult. Manual (5th ed.). Melbourne: School of Psychology, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.Google Scholar
  10. Daig, I., Herschbach, P., Lehmann, A., Knoll, N., & Decker, O. (2009). Gender and age differences in domain-specific life satisfaction and the impact of depressive and anxiety symptoms: A general population survey from Germany. Quality of Life Research, 18, 669–678.Google Scholar
  11. Davidov, E., Dülmer, H., Schlüter, E., Schmidt, P., & Meuleman, B. (2012). Using a multilevel structural equation modeling approach to explain cross-cultural measurement noninvariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 558–575.Google Scholar
  12. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E. (2009). Culture and well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (Social Indicators Research Series, Vol. 38). The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 926–935.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well‐being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Pressman, S. D. (2013). Optimism is universal: Exploring the presence and benefits of optimism in a representative sample of the world. Journal of Personality, 81, 429–440.Google Scholar
  20. Gallup, Inc. (2014). State of global well-being: Results of the Gallup-Healthways Global Well-being Index. Retrieved Jun 10, 2015, from:http://info.healthways.com/hs-fs/hub/162029/file-1634508606-pdf/WBI2013/Gallup-Healthways_State_of_Global_Well-Being_vFINAL.pdf.
  21. Graham, C., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2013). Gender and well-being around the world. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1, 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2015). World Happiness Report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
  25. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index–Adult (PWI–A). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  26. International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index (5th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.Google Scholar
  27. Joshanloo, M. (2013). The influence of fear of happiness beliefs on responses to the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 647–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joshanloo, M., & Afshari, S. (2011). Big five personality traits and self-esteem as predictors of life satisfaction in Iranian Muslim university students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 105–113.Google Scholar
  29. Kaliterna, Lj., & Burusic, J. (2014). Age and gender differences in well-being in Croatia. Social Indicators Research Series, 53, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapteyn, A., Smith, J. P., & Van Soest, A. (2010). Life satisfaction. In E. Diener, J. E. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 70–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403–430.Google Scholar
  33. Legatum Institute. (2014). The 2014 Legatum Prosperity Index. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from http://media.prosperity.com/2014/pdf/publications/PI2014Brochure_WEB.pdf.
  34. Loewe, N., Bagherzadeh, M., Araya-Castillo, L., Thieme, C., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2014). Life domain satisfactions as predictors of overall life satisfaction among workers: Evidence from Chile. Social Indicators Research, 118, 71–86.Google Scholar
  35. Looney, R. (2012). The Iranian economy: The glass half empty. London: The Legatum Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Lorenzo-Seva, U., Ferrando, P. J., & Chico, E. (2010). Two SPSS programs for interpreting multiple regression results. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lucas, R. E., & Gohm, C. L. (2000). Age and sex differences in subjective well-being across cultures. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 291–318). Massachusetts: Bradford.Google Scholar
  38. Meisenberg, G., & Woodley, M. A. (2015). Gender differences in subjective well-being and their relationships with gender equality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 1539–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrison, M., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Subjective well-being and national satisfaction: Findings from a worldwide survey. Psychological Science, 22, 166–171.Google Scholar
  40. Ng, W., & Diener, E. (2014). What matters to the rich and the poor? Subjective well-being, financial satisfaction, and post-materialistic needs across the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 326–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nimon, K. F., & Oswald, F. L. (2013). Understanding the results of multiple linear regression: Beyond standardized regression coefficients. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 650–674.Google Scholar
  42. Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.Google Scholar
  43. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Assessing well-being. Social Indicators Research Series, 39, 101–117.Google Scholar
  44. Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187–224.Google Scholar
  45. Renn, D., Pfaffenberger, N., Platter, M., Mitmansgruber, H., Cummins, R. A., & Hofer, S. (2009). International well-being index: The Austrian version. Social Indicators Research, 90, 243–256.Google Scholar
  46. Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 467–497.Google Scholar
  47. Rojas, M. (2007). The complexity of wellbeing: A life-satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Wellbeing in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 259–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schafer, M. H., Mustillo, S. A., & Ferraro, K. F. (2013). Age and the tenses of life satisfaction. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective wellbeing. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  50. Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345–384.Google Scholar
  51. Scott, J., Plagnol, A. C., & Nolan, J. (2010). Perceptions of quality of life: Gender differences across the life course. In J. Scott, R. Crompton, & C. Lyonette (Eds.), Gender inequalities in the 21st century: New barriers and continuing constraints (pp. 193–214). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sirgy, M. J., Widgery, R. N., Lee, D., & Yu, G. B. (2010). Developing a measure of community well-being based on perceptions of impact in various life domains. Social Indicators Research, 96, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smyth, R., Nielsen, I., & Zhai, Q. (2010). Personal wellbeing in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 95, 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tesch-Römer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective wellbeing: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85, 329–349.Google Scholar
  55. Theuns, P., Baran, B., Van Vaerenberg, R., Hellenbosch, G., & Tiliouine, H. (2012). A cross-cultural experimental approach to the contribution of health, religion and personal relations to subjective satisfaction with life as a whole. Psicológica, 33, 591–608.Google Scholar
  56. Transparency International. (2014). Corruption Perceptions Index. Retrieved Jun 5, 2015, from: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/results.
  57. Uchida, Y., & Ogihara, Y. (2012). Personal or interpersonal construal of happiness: A cultural psychological perspective. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 354–369.Google Scholar
  58. Van Beuningen, J., & de Jonge, T. (2011). The Personal Wellbeing Index: Construct validity for the Netherlands. Discussion paper (201124). Statistics Netherlands: The Hague.Google Scholar
  59. van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 51, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vasić, A., Šarčević, D., & Trogrlić, A. (2011). Zadovoljstvo životom u Srbiji [Satisfaction with life in Serbia]. Primenjena Psihologija, 2, 151–177.Google Scholar
  61. Veenhoven, R. (2012). Cross-national differences in happiness: Cultural measurement bias or effect of culture? International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 333–353.Google Scholar
  62. Vieira Lima, S. (2011). A cross-country investigation of the determinants of the happiness gender gap. Mimeo.University of Milan-Bicocca, Department of Economics, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
  63. World Bank. (2015). World databank. [Custom cross-tabulation of data]. Retrieved July 3, 2015, from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.1524.ZS.
  64. World Economic Forum (2014). The Global Gender Gap Report 2014. Retrieved July 7, 2015, from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GGGR14/GGGR_CompleteReport_2014.pdf.
  65. York, R., & Bell, S. E. (2014). Life satisfaction across nations: The effects of women’s political status and public priorities. Social Science Research, 48, 48–61.Google Scholar
  66. Zweig, J. S. (2015). Are women happier than men? Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veljko Jovanović
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohsen Joshanloo
    • 2
  • Dragan Đunda
    • 3
  • Ali Bakhshi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyKeimyung UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyQazvin Islamic Azad UniversityQazvinIran

Personalised recommendations