Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 1357–1377 | Cite as

From Spontaneous to Planned Urban Development and Quality of Life: the Case of Ho Chi Minh City

  • Du The HuynhEmail author
  • Richard B. Peiser


This paper studies the quality of life (QOL) that residents perceive in typical urban patterns in Ho Chi Minh City. Its major focus is to examine the improvement in the QOL through public intervention into the urban development process. There are four findings. First, moderate government intervention to correct market failures in areas where spontaneous urban development has occurred generates similar levels of satisfaction to areas with planned development. Second, urban planning is important as housing values and subjective satisfactions in planned areas are higher than those in spontaneous development areas. Third, redevelopment negatively affects the QOL in areas undergoing redevelopment. Finally, the contrast between the housing value and the subjective life satisfaction in spontaneous development areas undergoing redevelopment shows the problem of relying on the revealed preference assumption in traditional economics and the need for having alternative approaches.


Quality of life Urban planning Unplanned development Redevelopment Ho Chi Minh City 



We are grateful to Pham Minh Thien Phuoc and her team for helping us to conduct the onsite survey. We thank our colleagues and friends for their help and support.


  1. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnott, R. (2009). Housing policies in developing countries: the importance of the informal economy. In M. Spence, P. C. Annez, R. M. Buckley (Eds.), Urbanization and Growth. World Bank Publications, pp. 167–196.Google Scholar
  3. Belsky, E. S., et al. (2013). Advancing Inclusive and Sustainable Urban Development: Correcting Planning Failures and Connecting Communities to Capital, Joint Cener for Housing Studies of Harvard Univesity.Google Scholar
  4. Bertaud, A. (2004). The spatial organization of cities: deliberate outcome or unforeseen. Institute of Urban and Regional Development.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Money, sex and happiness: an empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415. doi: 10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00369.x [Accessed September 22, 2015].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blomquist, G. C., Berger, M. C., & Hoehn, J. P. (1988). New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. American Economic Review, 78(1), 89–107.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2009). Subjective quality of life in Zhuhai City, South China: a public survey using the international wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 91(2), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A., & Oswald, A. (1994). Unhappiness and unemploy. Economic Journal, 104(242), 648–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clawson, M. (1975). Economic and social conflicts in land use planning. Natural Resources Journal, 15.Google Scholar
  10. ALMEC Corporation (2004). The study on urban transport master plan and feasibility study in Ho Chi Minh metropolitan area (HOUTRANS).Google Scholar
  11. CPV (2002). Resolution 20-NQ/TW. Available at: In Vietnamese.Google Scholar
  12. Craglia, M., et al. (2004). Towards the development of quality of life indicators in the “digital” city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(1), 51–64. Available at: [Accessed September 22, 2015].
  13. Dapice, D., Gomez-Ibanez, J., Nguyen, X. T. (2010). Ho Chi Minh City: the challenges of growth, Vietnam Program at Harvard Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E. D., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1/2), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. Available at: [Accessed July 14, 2014].
  16. DOS-HCMC (2011). Statistical yearbook, 2010.Google Scholar
  17. DOS-HCMC (2015). Statistics in 2014.Google Scholar
  18. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–124). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ECA International (2012). Hong Kong: Asia’s Third Most Liveable City, but among the World’s Worst for Air Quality.Google Scholar
  20. EIU (2012). Best cities ranking and report. Google Scholar
  21. European Commission (2013). Quality of life in cities: perception survey in 79 European cities, Available at:
  22. Fainstein, S. (2001). The city builders: Property Development in New York and London.Google Scholar
  23. Fainstein, S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fainstein, N., Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The changing character of urban redevelopment since 1945 *.Google Scholar
  25. Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (1997). Factor analysis, causal indicators and quality of life. Quality of Life Research : an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 6(2), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Felce, D., & Perry, J. (1995). Quality of life: its definition and measurement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16(1), 51–74. Available at: [Accessed June 30, 2015].
  27. Feler, L., & Henderson, J. V. (2011). Exclusionary policies in urban development: under-servicing migrant households in Brazilian cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(3), 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gyourko, J. (1991). How accurate are quality-of-life rankings across cities? Business Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  29. Gyourko, J., Kahn, M., Tracy, J. (1999). Applied Urban Economics, Elsevier. Available at: [Accessed September 22, 2015].
  30. Hill, R. (2011). Hedonic Price Indexes for Housing, OECD Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  31. Huynh, T. D. (2012). The transformation of Ho Chi Minh City: issues in managing growth. Harvard.Google Scholar
  32. Huynh, T. D. (2015). The misuse of urban planning in Ho Chi Minh City. Habitat International, 48, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, B.-K. (1998). Socioeconomic status and perception of the quality of life in Korea. Development and Society, 27(2), 15.Google Scholar
  34. Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., & Royuela, V. (2006). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9071-5 [Accessed September 17, 2015].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lelkes, O. (2006). Knowing what is good for you. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lora, E., et al. (2010). The Quality of Life in Latin American Cities. In E. Lora, et al. (eds.), New York: The Inter-American Development Bank and The World Bank.Google Scholar
  37. Malpezzi, S. (2002). Housing economics: essays in honor of Duncan Maclennan. In K. Gibb, A. O’Sullivan (eds), Land Economics, 67–89.Google Scholar
  38. Mercer Consultant Company (2012). Livable ranking - Mercer’s 205 cities in 2012.Google Scholar
  39. Mills, E. S. (1967). An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area. American Economic Review, 57(2), 197–210.Google Scholar
  40. Morais, P., Miguéis, V. L., Camanho, A. S. (2011). Quality of life experienced by human capital: an assessment of European cities. Social Indicators Research.Google Scholar
  41. Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and Housing, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Nguyen, M. H. (2008). Potential for Saigon river miracle. Vietnamese: Ho Chi Minh City General Publisher.Google Scholar
  43. Nguyen, D. D. (2012). Saigon South: a brief history of planning. Available at:
  44. Ni, P., Oyeyinka, B., Chen, F. (2015). Urban Innovation and Upgrading in China Shanty Towns - Changing, Available at: [Accessed September 17, 2015].
  45. Peiser, R. B. (1984). Does it pay to plan suburban growth? Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(4), 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pichler, F. (2006). Subjective quality of life of young Europeans. Feeling happy but who knows why? Social Indicators Research, 75(3), 419–444. doi: 10.1007/s11205-004-4337-2 [Accessed September 22, 2015].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Powell, A., & Sanguinetti, P. (2010) Measuring quality of life in Latin America’s urban neighborhoods: a summary of results from the city case studies. In E. Lora et al. (eds.), The Quality of Life in Latin American Cities. International American Development Bank and World Bank, p. 296.Google Scholar
  48. van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2010). Toward an urban quality of life index: basic theory and econometric methods. In E. Lora et al. (eds.), The Quality of Life in Latin American Cities. International American Development Bank and World Bank, p. 296.Google Scholar
  49. Proctor, C. L., Linley, A., & Maltby, J. (2008). Youth life satisfaction: a review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(5), 583–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reisig, M. D., & Parks, R. B. (2000). Experience, quality of life, and neighborhood context: a hierarchical analysis of satisfaction with police. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6), 1257–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodgers, D., Beall, J., & Kanbur, R. (2011). Latin American urban development into the twenty-first century: towards a renewed perspective on the city. European Journal of Development Research, 23(4), 550–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosen, S. (1979). Wage-based indexes of urban quality of life. In P. Mieszkowski & M. Straszheim (Eds.), Current issues in urban economics (pp. 74–104). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sheppard, S. (1999). Hedonic analysis of housing markets. In P. Cheshire & E. Mills (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (pp. 1595–1635). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  55. Sorensen, A.D., & Day, R.A. (1981). Libertarian planning. Town Planning Review, 52(4).Google Scholar
  56. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox*. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 339–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00542.x [Accessed August 10, 2015].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Thrift, N., & Forbes, D. (1986). The price of war: urbanization in Vietnam 1954-1985, Allen and Unwin Press.Google Scholar
  59. Ton, N. Q. T., & Nguyen, T. H. (2007). The culture of Saigon alley society. Vietnamese: Ho Chi Minh City General Publisher.Google Scholar
  60. Trinh, D. L., & Nguyen, Q. V. (1998). Socieconomic impacts of renovation on urban housing. Vietnamese: Social Science Publisher.Google Scholar
  61. UN-Habitat (2003). The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements 2003.Google Scholar
  62. UN-Habitat (2009). Planning Sustainable Cities: Global Report on Human Settlements 2009.Google Scholar
  63. USAID (1972). Dialectics of Urban Proposal for the Saigon Metropolitan Area, Available at:
  64. Van Kamp, I., et al. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. In Landscape and Urban Planning. pp. 5–18.Google Scholar
  65. Waibel, M., et al. (2007). Housing for low-income groups in Ho Chi Minh City between reintegration and fragmentation approaches to adequate urban typologies and spatial strategies. The German Journal on Contemporary Asia, 103, 61–78.Google Scholar
  66. World Bank (2009). World Development Report.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fulbright Economics Teaching ProgramHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Harvard Graduate School of DesignCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations