Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 1321–1340 | Cite as

Patterns of Walking Among Employed, Urban Canadians: Variations by Commuting Mode, Time of Day, and Days of the Week

Article

Abstract

This paper illustrates the facility of time-use files to enhance the understanding of behavioral components of commuting. It draws on data from Statistics Canada’s most recent national General Social Survey (2010) to substantiate prior research on the extent that use of public transit for commuting to work is accompanied in people’s days by a greater amount of walking. By verifying alternative explanations for this relationship, the paper explores more thoroughly how walking fits into the daily lives of employed persons in large urban areas. Results show that travel by car comprises upwards of 80 per cent of trips regardless of the hour of the day, while public transportation is used mostly to get to and from paid work. Although walking generally accompanies such transit commutes and is shown to fit sequentially into transit’s temporal patterns, walking spreads out more evenly across the day than transit use and helps complete other trip purposes. The weekday walking pattern extends to weekend days to a surprisingly similar extent, confirming that transit is but one of numerous generators of walking trips. Statistically significant relationships link minutes walked to household income, access to a car, and main mode used for commuting. However, the pre-eminence of commuting by car raises questions about the effective priorities and constraints underlying choice of main commuting mode. More detailed characterization of transit access and subjective questions in time-use surveys could facilitate greater insight into the rationales of the subgroup choosing public transit and walking more frequently and for longer duration.

Keywords

Mass transit, Time use, Access, Travel, Active transportation, 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the Social Science and Humanities Research Council and the Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture for funding the second author’s research project on time use and travel. The Data Library at the University of Toronto is also acknowledged for creating and maintaining the merged time use files in their archives.

References

  1. Abraham, K., Maitland, A., & Bianchi, S. (2006). Non-response in the American time use survey: Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besser, L., & Dannenberg, A. (2005). Walking to public transit: steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(4), 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, B., & Werner, C. (2007). A new rail stop: tracking moderate physical activity bouts and ridership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4, 306–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP) (2012). Canadian physical activity guidelines and Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines: Your plan to get active every day. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP), 29. CSEP_Guidelines_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Christian, T. (2012). Trade-offs between commuting time and health-related activities. Journal of Urban Health, 89(5), 746–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cutt, C., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2008). Does getting a dog increase recreational walking? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 5(17). doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-17
  7. Fisher, K., Shabazian, R., & Sepahvand, M. (2012). Environmental policies and daily behaviours in the USA: how time diaries inform sustainability debates. In CTUR technical paper 2012–02, Oxford, UK: Centre for time use research. Oxford: University of.Google Scholar
  8. Freeland, A., Banerjee, S., Dannenberg, A., & Wendel, A. (2013). Walking associated with public transit: moving toward increased physical activity in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 103(3), 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, T., Owen, C., Victor, C., Adams, R., Ekelund, U., & Cook, C. (2009). A comparison of questionnaire, accelerometer, and pedometer: measures in older people. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(7), 1392–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heisz, A., & Schellenberg, G. (2004). Public transit use among immigrants. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 13(1), 170–191.Google Scholar
  11. Lachapelle, U. (2009). Reconciling the construct of walking in physical activity and transportation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(4), 372–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lachapelle, U., & Frank, L. (2009). Transit and health: mode of transport, employer-sponsored public transit pass programs, and physical activity. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, S73–S94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lachapelle, U., & Noland, R. (2012). Does the commute mode affect the frequency of walking behavior? The public transit link. Transport Policy, 21(C), 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lachapelle, U., Frank, L., Saelens, B., Sallis, J., & Conway, T. (2011). Commuting by public transit and physical activity: where you live, where you work, and how you get there. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 8, S72–S82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacDonald, J., Stokes, R., Cohen, D., Kofner, A., & Ridgeway, G. (2010). The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Michelson, W. (2005). Time use: expanding explanation in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Michelson, W. (2009). Variations in the rational use of time – the travel pulse of commutes between home and job. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 6(2), 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ming Wen, L., & Rissel, C. (2008). Inverse associations between cycling to work, public transport, and overweight and obesity: findings from a population based study in Australia. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morabia, A., & Costanza, M. (2010). It takes a train to knock down global warming and obesity. Preventive Medicine, 51(6), 449–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morency, C., Trépanier, M., & Demers, M. (2011). Walking to transit: an unexpected source of physical activity. Transport Policy, 18(6), 800–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nilsson, M., & Küller, R. (2000). Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transportation Research, Oxford: Pergamon Press, Part, D5, 211–234.Google Scholar
  23. Nolan, M., Mitchell, J., & Doyle-Baker, P. (2014). Validity of the apple iPhone®/iPod touch® as an accelerometer- based physical activity monitor: a proof-of-concept study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 11(4), 759–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saelens, B., Moudon, V., Kang, B., Hurvitz, P., & Zhou, C. (2014). Relation between higher physical activity and public transit use. American Journal of Public Health, 104(5), 854–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spinney, J., Millward, H., & Scott, D. (2012). Walking for transport versus recreation: a comparison of participants, timing, and locations. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9, 153–162.Google Scholar
  26. Statistics Canada (2010). General Social Survey, Cycle 24: Time Stress and Well-Being, 2010: Public Use Microdata Files (12M0024X). http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/olc-cel/olc.action?objId=12M0024X&objType=2&lang=en&limit=0
  27. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.
  28. Turcotte, M. (2006). Like commuting? Workers’ perceptions of their daily commute. Canadian Social Trends - Statistics Canada. Catalogue No. 11-008, 33–39.Google Scholar
  29. Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Holle, V., Simons, D., Deridder, R., Clarys, P., Goubert, L., Nasar, J., Salmon, J., DeBourdeauhuij, I., & Deforhe, B. (2012). Environmental factors influencing older adults' walking for transportation: A study using walk-along interviews. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 9(85). doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-85.
  30. Van Eck, J., Burghouwt, G., & Dijst, M. (2005). Lifestyles, spatial configurations and quality of life in daily travel: an explorative simulation study. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(2), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., & McCormack, G. (2008). Achieving 10,000 steps: a comparison of public transport users and drivers in a university setting. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 338–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Warburton, D., Nicol, C., & Bredin, S. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(6), 801–809.Google Scholar
  33. Wasfi, R., Ross, N., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Achieving recommended daily physical activity levels through commuting by public transportation: Unpacking individual and contextual influences. Health & Place, 23, 18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yabroff, K., Troiano, R., & Berrigan, D. (2008). Walking the dog: is pet ownership associated with physical activity in California? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(2), 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Département d’études urbaines et touristiques, École des sciences de la gestionUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations