Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 689–701 | Cite as

The Influence of Coping Strategies on Quality of Life from a Gender Perspective

  • Silvia Gattino
  • Chiara RolleroEmail author
  • Norma De Piccoli


The current study had two main purposes: 1) testing the predictive role of the coping strategies on the four domains of Quality of Life (physical, psychological, relational, and environmental domain), and 2) investigating the effect of gender as a moderator in the relationship between coping strategies and QoL’s dimensions. A total of 600 adults (56 % females) participated in the research. Data were collected via a self-reported questionnaire, assessing Quality of Life, coping strategies, and socio-demographic characteristics. Results showed that problem-focused coping strategies, i.e. active coping, positive reframing, and using support, increase quality of life in all its dimensions, whereas emotion-focused coping, i.e. self-blame, diminishes both physical and psychological QoL. Gender acts as a moderator: social and instrumental enhances relational QoL for women, whereas self-blame is particularly maladaptive for men, as it decreases their QoL in each of the four domains. Findings reveal that coping strategies could be an important consequence of gender linked socialization experiences. Understanding determinants of quality of life is critical for developing policies interested in health promotion.


Quality of life Coping strategies Gender Moderation 


  1. Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2010). Quality of life, subjective well-being, and religiosity in Muslim college students. Quality of Life Research, 19, 1133–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benyamini, Y., Blumestein, T., Lusky, A., & Modan, B. (2003). Gender differences in the self-rated health-mortality association: is it poor self-rated health that predicts mortality or excellent self-rated health that predicts survival? The Gerontologist, 43, 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Zur, H. (2009). Coping styles and affect. International Stress of Management, 16, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boals, A., vanDellen, M. R., & Banks, J. B. (2011). The relationship between self-control and health: the mediating effect of avoidant coping. Psychology & Health, 26, 1049–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büssing, A., Fischer, J., Ostermann, T., & Matthiessen, P. F. (2009). Reliance on God’s help as a measure of intrinsic religiosity in healthy elderly and patients with chronic diseases. correlations with health-related quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(1), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, S. C. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver, S. C., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crimmins, E. M., Kim, J. K., & Solè-Aurò, A. (2010). Gender differences in health: results from SHARE, ELSA and HRS. European Journal of Public Health, 21, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cummins, R. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: the role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Girolamo, G., Becchi, M. A., Coppa, F. S., De Leo, D., Neri, G., Rucci, P., & Scocco, P. (Eds.). (2001). Il WHOQOL, Salute e Qualità della Vita, [WHOQOL, Health and QoL]. Torino: CSE.Google Scholar
  13. Denton, M., Prus, S., & Walters, V. (2004). Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 2585–2600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodoo, F. N. A., & Frost, A. E. (2008). Gender in African population research: the fertility/reproductive health example. Annual Review Sociology, 34, 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dzuka, J. (2012). Subjective evaluation of quality of life: definition, measurement, and starting points for further research. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 56, 148–156.Google Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Felsten, G. (1998). Gender and coping: use of distinct strategies and association with stress and depression. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 11, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallicchio, L., Hoffman, S. C., & Helzlsouer, K. J. (2007). The relationship between gender, social support, and health-related quality of life in a community based study in Washington County, Maryland. Quality of Life Research, 19, 777–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gattino, S., De Piccoli, N., Fassio, O., & Rollero, C. (2013). Quality of life and sense of community. A study on health and place of residence. Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 811–826.Google Scholar
  20. Glass, K., Flory, K., Hankin, B. L., Kloos, B., & Turecki, G. (2009). Are coping strategies, social support, and hope associated with psychological distress among Hurricane Katrina survivors? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28(6), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawthorne, G., Herrman, H., & Murphy, B. (2006). Interpreting the WHOQOL-BREF: Preliminary population norms and effect sizes. Social Indicators Research, 77, 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78, 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kershaw, T., Northouse, L., Kritpracha, C., Schafenacker, A., & Mood, D. (2004). Coping strategies and quality of life in women with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers. Psychology & Health, 19, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirchengast, S., & Haslinger, B. (2008). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 458–467.Google Scholar
  25. Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  26. Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Toward better research on stress and coping. American Psychologist, 55, 665–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Littleton, H., Horsley, S., John, S., & Nelson, D. V. (2007). Trauma coping strategies and psychological distress: a meta-analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 977–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maan Diong, S., Bishop, G. D., Enkelmann, H. C., Tong, E. M., Why, Y. P., Ang, J. C., & Khader, M. (2005). Anger, stress, coping, social support and health: modelling the relationships. Psychology & Health, 20, 467–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacKinnon, D. P., & Luecken, L. J. (2008). How and for whom? mediation and moderation in health psychology. Health Psychology, 27, s99–s100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2012). Biological and psychosocial responses to discrimination. The social cure: Identity, health and well-being, 133-153.Google Scholar
  32. Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping style. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1401–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J. S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 551–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prus, S. G. (2011). Comparing social determinants of self-rated health across the United States and Canada. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Read, J. G., & Gorman, B. K. (2010). Gender and health inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rollero, C. (2013). Men and women facing objectification: the effects of media models on wellbeing, self-esteem and ambivalent sexism. Hombres y mujeres frente a la cosificación: los efectos de los modelos mediáticos sobre el bienestar, la autoestima y el sexismo ambivalente. Revista de Psicologia Social, 28, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rollero, C., Gattino, S., & De Piccoli, N. (2014). A gender lens on quality of life: the role of sense of community, perceived social support, self-reported health and income. Social Indicators Research, 116, 887–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41, 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 48, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sirgy, M. J. (2011). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects. Social Indicators Research, 103, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skevington, S. M. (2010). Qualities of life, educational level and human development: an international investigation of health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 999–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skevington, S. M., Lofty, M., & O’Connell, K. (2004). The world health organisation’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanojević, D., Krstić, M., Jaredić, B., & Dimitrijević, B. (2013). Proactive Coping as a Mediator Between Resources and Outcomes: A Structural Equations Modeling Analysis. Applied Research in Quality of Life. doi:  10.1007/s11482-013-9274-2.
  46. Stanton, A. L., Danoff-Burg, S., Cameron, C. L., Bishop, M., Collins, C. A., Kirk, S. B., & Twillman, R. (2000). Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stefani, D. (2004). Gender and coping style in old age. Interdisciplinaria, Numero Especial, 109–125.Google Scholar
  48. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2011). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. 2009. Dostupné z: www. stiglitz-sen-fitoussi. fr.Google Scholar
  49. Tesch-Römer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85, 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. WHOQOL Group. (1995). The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the world health organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1403–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilkinson, R. B., Walford, W. A., & Espnes, G. A. (2000). Coping styles and psychological health in adolescents and young adults: a comparison of moderator and main effects models. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Health Organization (WHO). (2001). Mainstreaming gender equity in health: the need to move forward. Madrid: Statement.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Gattino
    • 1
  • Chiara Rollero
    • 2
    Email author
  • Norma De Piccoli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
  2. 2.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity eCampusNovedrateItaly

Personalised recommendations