Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 289–304

Satisfaction with Love Life Across the Adult Life Span

Article

Abstract

Three issues concerning the relationship between age and satisfaction with love life are examined in this study. The first issue concerns the age generalizability of the factor structure of the Satisfaction With Love Life Scale (SWLLS). The second issue explores the influence of background factors, namely age, on satisfaction with love life. Finally, the third issue concerns the relation between scores on the SWLLS with those on other relationship constructs. A total of 1,284 women (48 %) and men participated in the study. The mean ages were 38 years; ages ranged from 18 to 90. The results showed that the factor structure of responses to the Satisfaction With Love Life Scale are highly similar across the adult life. Adults reported higher satisfaction with love life than older adults. As predicted love life satisfaction was correlated with measures of other relational constructs. Satisfaction with love life was positively correlated with erotic and agapic orientations among young adults, adults and older adults. Unexpected significant positive associations between love satisfaction, and Ludus and Mania were found among adults. Significant negative correlations were found between love satisfaction, and romantic loneliness. Significant positive associations between love satisfaction, and partnership commitment, sexual desire, satisfaction with life and affective well-being were found for the three age groups, except for older adults and this last variable. Suggestions concerning possible uses of the SWLLS are advanced.

Keywords

Age Love Measurement Satisfaction Well-being 

References

  1. Abdel-Khalek, A. (2012). Subjective well-being and religiosity: a cross-sectional study with adolescents, young and middle-age adults. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves, M. A. (2012). Características desejadas num par romântico a longo prazo. Porto: Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade do Porto, unpublished Master Dissertation.Google Scholar
  3. Arakawa, D. R., Flanders, C. E., Hatfield, E., & Heck, R. (2013). Positive psychology: what impact has it had on sex research publication trends? Sexuality & Culture, 17, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95 %: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrindell, W. A., van Niewenhuizen, C., & Luteijn, F. (2001). Chronic psychiatric status and satisfaction with life. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayyash-Abdo, H., & Alamuddin, R. (2007). Predictors of well-being among college youth in Lebanon. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biswas-Diener, R. (2006). From the equator to the north polo: a study of character strengths. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broderick, J. E., & O’Leary, D. (1986). Contributions of affect, attitudes, and behavior to marital satisfaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cate, R. M., Koval, J., Loyd, S. A., & Wilson, G. (1995). Assessment of relationship thinking in dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 2, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and iil-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Subjective emotional well-being. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 325–337). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E. R., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiTommaso, E., & Spinner, B. (1993). The development and initial validation of a measure of social and emotional loneliness (SELSA). Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DiTommaso, E., Brannen, C., & Best, L. (2004). Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of eh social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellison, C. G., Gay, D. A., & Glass, T. A. (1989). Does religious involvement translate into individual life satisfaction? Social Forces, 68, 100–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandes, H., & Neto, F. (2009). Adaptação portuguesa da Escala de Solidão Social e Emocional (SELSA-S). Psicologia, Educação e Cultura, XIII, 7–31.Google Scholar
  21. Flechter, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: a confirmatory analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gartner, J., Larson, D. B., & Allen, G. D. (1991). Religious commitment and mental health: a review of empirical literature. Journal of Psychology and Religion, 19, 6–25.Google Scholar
  23. Goodboy, A. K., Moran, S. M., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2012). Intentional jealousy-evoking behaviour in romantic relationships as a function of received partner affection and love styles. Communication Quarterly, 60, 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodwin, R., Cook, O., & Yung, Y. (2001). Loneliness and life satisfaction among three cultural groups. Personal Relationships, 8, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Green, K. V., & Yoon, B. J. (2004). Religiosity, economics and life satisfaction. Review of Social Economy, 62, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guedes, M. J, (2011). Satisfação com a vida amorosa nas relações de intimidade dos pares de namordos. Porto: Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade do Porto, unpublished Master Dissertation.Google Scholar
  27. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1995). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  28. Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. (2014). Love and sex after 50. In P. Whelehan & A. Bolin (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human sexuality. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Martel, L. D. (2007). Passionate love and sexual desire. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 760–779). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hatfield, E., Pillemer, J. T., O’Brien, M., & Le, Y. (2008). The endurance of love: passionate love and companionate love in newlywed and long-term marriages. Interpersona, 2, 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hatfield, E., Bensman, L., & Rapson, R. L. (2012). A brief history of social scientists’ attempts to measure passionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1988). Lovers wear rose colored glasses. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hendrick, S., & Hendrick, C. (2002). Love. In R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 472–484). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hendrick, S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationships assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kurdek, L. A. (1991). The relations between reported well-being and divorce history, availability of proximate adult, and gender. Journal of Marriage and Family Relations, 53, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee, J. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. Toronto: New Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, J. A. (1988). Love-styles. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 38–67). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Meeks, B. S., Hendrick, S., & Hendrick, C. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 755–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Munoz Sastre, M. T., Vainsonneau, G., Neto, F., Girard, M., & Mullet, E. (2003). Forgiveness and satisfaction with life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, J., & Shurts, M. (2002). Measuring positive emotionality: a review of instruments assessing love. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 238–254.Google Scholar
  44. Neto, F. (1993a). Love styles and self-representations. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neto, F. (1993b). Satisfaction with life among Portuguese adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Neto, F. (1994). Love styles among Portuguese students. Journal of Psychology, 128, 613–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neto, F. (1995). Predictors of satisfaction with life among second generation migrants. Social Indicators Research, 35, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neto, F. (2001). Love styles of three generations of women. Marriage & Family Review, 33(4), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neto, F. (2005). The satisfaction with love life scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38, 2–13.Google Scholar
  50. Neto, F. (2012). The satisfaction with sex life scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 45, 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neto, F., Mullet, E., Deschamps, J., Barros, J., Benvindo, R., Camino, L., et al. (2000). Cross-cultural variations in attitudes toward love. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 626–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Orathinkal, J., & Vansteenwegen, A. (2007). Do demographics affect marital satisfaction? Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 33, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peplau, L., & Perlman, D. (1982). Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  55. Regan, P. C. (1998). Of lust and love: beliefs about the role of sexual desire in romantic relationship. Personal Relationships, 5, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1999). Lust: What we know about human sexual desire. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Reis, H. T., & Aron, A. (2009). Love: what is it, does it matter, and how it operate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rich, G. J. (2003). The positive psychology of youth and adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273.Google Scholar
  60. Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  61. Salvatore, N., & Munoz Sastre, T. (2001). Appraisal of life: area versus dimension conceptualizations. Social Indicators Research, 53, 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simões, A. (1993). São os homens mais agressivos que as mulheres? Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, XXVII, 387–404.Google Scholar
  64. Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. (1998). Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Tiangular love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 119–138). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1070–1079.Google Scholar
  67. Weiss, R. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  68. Wilson, W. (1967). Correlates of avowed happiness. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da EducaçãoUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations