Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 305–328 | Cite as

Conceptual Domains Included in Wellbeing and Life Satisfaction Instruments: A Review

  • Sherma J. Charlemagne-BadalEmail author
  • Jerry W. Lee
  • Terry L. Butler
  • Gary E. Fraser
Article

Abstract

Wellbeing and life satisfaction instruments are increasingly used in health outcome research, and by health professionals. Despite their usefulness, the absence of an agreed on conceptual definition of wellbeing, and corresponding inconsistencies in operationalization, makes it difficult for researchers to operationalize the concept, and for health professionals to determine which instruments are most suitable for use. Therefore the aim of the study was to identify and define conceptual domains included in wellbeing, and life satisfaction instruments and delineate their operationalization. Using the Health and Psychosocial Instruments database (HaPI), a search for wellbeing and life satisfaction instruments was conducted for all available years using the key words of wellbeing, wellness, life satisfaction, and personal satisfaction. Measurement instruments were critically reviewed using five coding guides. Next, three raters content-analyzed the 680 items in the instruments and identified 15 conceptual domains. Finally, five other raters separately coded items into the 15 domains with a .83 coefficient of agreement. Twenty-six of the 250 instruments met inclusion criteria. The documents revealed moderate or high reliability and validity for the instruments. Items from the emotional health, physical health, social health, and non-leisure activities domains were most commonly included in the instruments. These domains were included in 73, 69, 65, and 65 % of all instruments respectively. No instrument included items from all 15 domains; the largest number included was 12 in two instruments. Despite the need for a comprehensive wellbeing instrument for research, and clinical applications, most wellbeing and life satisfaction instruments include only a few domains.

Keywords

Wellbeing Life satisfaction Systematic review Measurement instruments 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Ervin Taylor, Carla Fider, Dominick Sturz, Lorraine Thomas, and one other for categorizing the domains as described in the third phase of this research. We would also like to thank the school of public health for funding the study.

References

  1. Adams, T., Bezner, J., & Steinhardt, M. (1997). The conceptualization and measurement of perceived wellness: integrating balance across and within dimensions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(3), 208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality New York. London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behavioral Measurement Database Services. (2011). Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Retrieved December 14, 2011, from http://www.bmdshapi.com/index.html
  4. Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  5. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). Affect balance scale. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (1984). Dimensions of subjective mental health in American men and women. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25, 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 290–314. doi: 10.1177/1088868310391271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camfield, L., Guillen-Royo, M., & Velazco, J. (2010). Does needs satisfaction matter for psychological and subjective wellbeing in developing countries: a mixed-methods illustration from Bangladesh and Thailand. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(4), 497–516. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9154-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Campion, J., & Nurse, J. (2007). A dynamic model for wellbeing. Australasian Psychiatry, 15, S24–S28. doi: 10.1080/10398560701701106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlsson, M., Hamrin, E., & Lindqvist, R. (1999). Psychometric assessment of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ) and a comparison of a randomised sample of Swedish women and those suffering from breast cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed., Vol. 2). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Corbin, C., & Pangrazi, R. (2001). Toward a uniform definition of wellness: a commentary. President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest, 3(15), 1–8.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. A. (1993). The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale: Adult. 4th Edition (ComQol-A4). from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/comqol-scale/
  15. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: an attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for people with disabilities (second ed.). United Kingdom: Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A mode of subjective well-being homeostasis: The role of personality. In E. Gullone & R. A. Cummins (Eds.), The universality of subjectivy wellbeing indicators a multi-disciplinary and multi-national perspective (Vol. 16). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). Satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elliot, A. J., Thrash, T. M., & Murayama, K. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of self-regulation and well-being: avoidance personal goals, avoidance coping, stress generation, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 79(3), 643–674. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00694.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Endicott, J., Nee, J., Harrison, W., & Blumenthal, R. (1993). Quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire. Pharmacology Bulletin, 29, 321–326.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992). Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: a measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Golding, B. (2011). Older men’s wellbeing through community participation in Australia. International Journal of Men’s Health, 10(1), 26–44. doi: 10.3149/jmh.1001.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henrich, G., & Herschbach, P. (2000). Questions on life satisfaction (FLZM): a short questionnaire for assessing subjective quality of life. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jasnoski, M. L., & Schwartz, G. E. (1985). A synchronous systems model for health. American Behavioral Scientist, 28(4), 468–485. doi: 10.1177/000276485028004004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jovanovic, V. (2011). Personality and subjective well-being: one neglected model of personality and two forgotten aspects of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 631–635. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kedenberg, D. (1980). Modified quality of life scale. Quality of Life Scale: A preliminary analysis, 11, 599–605.Google Scholar
  28. Kiefer, R. A. (2008). An integrative review of the concept of well-being. Holistic Nursing Practice, 22(5), 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewinsohn, P. M., Redner, J. E., & Seeley, J. R. (1991). The relationship between life satisfaction and psychosocial variables: new perspectives. Elmford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  30. McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McHorney, C. A. P., Johne, W. J. P., & Anastasiae, R. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31(3), 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McMahan, E., & Estes, D. (2011). Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: evidence of differential associations with self-reported well-being. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9698-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmore, E., & Luikart, C. (1972). Health and social factors related to life satisfaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 13, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patrick, D. L., Danis, M., Southerland, L. I., & Hong, G. (1988). Quality of life following intensive care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 3, 218–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Petch-Levine, D., Petch-Levine, D., Cureton, V. Y., Canham, D., & Murray, M. (2003). Health practices of school nurses. The Journal of School Nursing, 19(3), 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reker, G. T. (1995). Perceived Well-Being Scale–Revised. Reliability and validity of the Perceived Well-Being Scale–Revised.Google Scholar
  37. Roberts, R. E., Pascoe, G. C., & Attkisson, C. C. (1983). Relationship of service satisfaction to life satisfaction and perceived well-being. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6, 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schutte, N. S., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Hine, D. W., Foster, R., Cauchi, A., & Binns, C. (2010). Experiential and rational processing styles, emotional intelligence and wellbeing. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(1), 14–19. doi: 10.1080/00049530903312865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seeman, J. (1989). Toward a model of positive health. American Psychologist, 44(8), 1099–1109. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.44.8.1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Senol-Durak, E., & Durak, M. (2011). The mediator roles of life satisfaction and self-esteem between the affective components of psychological well-being and the cognitive symptoms of problematic internet use. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 23–32. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9694-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sireci, S. G. (1998). Gathering and analyzing content validity data. Educational Assessment, 5(4), 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sousa, K. H., & Chen, F. F. (2002). A theoretical approach to measuring quality of life. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 10(1), 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1988). The MOS short-form general health survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 26(7), 724–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sumerlin, J. R. (1997). Self-actualization and hope. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 1101–1110.Google Scholar
  46. The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valimaki, M., Leino-Kilpi, H., Gronroos, M., Dassen, T., Gasull, M., Lemonidou, C., & Benedicta, M. (2004). Self-determination in surgical patients in five European countries. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(4), 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Veit, C. T., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(5), 730–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wenger, N. K., Mattson, M. E., Furberg, C. D., & Elinson, J. (Eds.). (1984). Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials of cardiovascular therapies. New York: Le Jacq.Google Scholar
  50. White, S. (2010). Analysing wellbeing: a framework for development practice. Development in Practice, 20(2), 158–172. doi: 10.1080/09614520903564199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. World Health Organization WHO. (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, June 19–22, 1946; signed on July 22, 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, 2: 100) and entered into force on April 7, 1948. “Constitution of the World Health Organization, 1948.” In Basic Documents, 15th Edn. Geneva, Switzerland. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherma J. Charlemagne-Badal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jerry W. Lee
    • 2
  • Terry L. Butler
    • 3
  • Gary E. Fraser
    • 3
  1. 1.Nichol Hall Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public HealthLoma Linda UniversityLoma LindaUSA
  2. 2.Nichol Hall Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Public HealthLoma Linda UniversityLoma LindaUSA
  3. 3.Nichol Hall Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Population Medicine, School of Public HealthLoma Linda UniversityLoma LindaUSA

Personalised recommendations