Influences of Affect Associated with Routine Out-of-Home Activities on Subjective Well-Being
A survey of a random sample of 1,330 Swedish residents assessed the relationships between affect associated with performance of routine out-of-home activities, mood, and judgments of life satisfaction (cognitive subjective wellbeing, CSWB). Regression analyses showed that sociodemographic variables accounted for most variance in CSWB (7%) and least in mood (2%). In agreement with previous research, CSWB increased with income, employment, and cohabiting with a spouse, and had a U-formed relationship with age. Affect associated with routine activities accounted for more variance than the socio-demographic variables in mood (30%) and in CSWB (13%). Mood partially mediated the effect on CSWB of affect associated with the activities. The results suggest that future policy-related research should consider the possibility that community-provided resources that facilitate performance of routine out-of-home activities would increase life satisfaction.
KeywordsSubjective wellbeing Mood Routine out-of-home activities Swedish residents
Financial support for this research was obtained by grant #AL90A 2006:16305 from the Swedish Road Administration through the program “Social and economic impacts of the automobile“(www.BISEK.se) to the Centre for Consumer Science, School of Business, Economics, and Law, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. We thank Bertil Vilhelmson for reading the manuscript.
- Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates in happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 353–373). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (Eds.). (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ettema, D., & Timmermans, H. P. J. (Eds.). (1997). Activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2010). Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transportation Research. Part A, 44, 723–732.Google Scholar
- Jakobsson Bergstad, C., Gamble, A., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., et al. (2011b). Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation, 38, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1 (4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, N., Kahneman, D., & Xu, J. (2008). Global and episodic reports of hedonic experience. In R. Belli, F. P. Stafford, & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Calendar and time diary methods in life course research (pp. 157–174). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Statistics Sweden (2009). Statistical database (on-line). Retrieved March 24, 2010 from http://www.ssd.scb.se.
- Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Ecological momentary assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 26–39). New York: Russell-Sage.Google Scholar
- Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis. (2007). RES 2005–2006: den nationella resvaneundersökningen (in Swedish) [TRAVEL 2005–2006: The national travel survey]. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis.Google Scholar
- Vilhelmson, B. (2007). The use of the car—mobility dependencies of urban everyday life. In T. Gärling & L. Steg (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 145–164). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar