Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 41–51 | Cite as

Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke: A Brief Tool

  • Mary Russell
  • Martin Dempster
  • Michael Donnelly
Article

Abstract

Routine assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be time consuming and burdensome for a person with stroke. Therefore the aim of this study was to develop and test a brief instrument for assessing HRQoL among people with stroke. The Quality of Life after Stroke Scale (QLASS) was constructed from items within the Quality of Life Index-Stroke Version and the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. It was administered to 92 people with stroke at three points in time: immediately after discharge from hospital, 6 months and 12 months later. Results suggest that the QLASS has 19 items which represent three factors: emotional functioning, mastery and fatigue which correlate with valid measures of health status and activities of daily living. The QLASS is proposed as a brief, valid HRQoL tool for use among people with stroke.

Keywords

Quality of life Stroke Questionnaire validity 

References

  1. Astrom, M. (1996). Generalized anxiety disorder in stroke patients. Stroke, 27, 270–275.Google Scholar
  2. Barker-Collo, S. L. (2007). Depression and anxiety 3 months post stroke: prevalence and correlates. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi-Kwon, S., Han, S. W., Kwon, S. U., & Kim, J. S. (2005). Poststroke fatigue: characteristics and related factors. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 19, 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Haan, R. J., Aaronson, N., Limburg, M., Langton Hewer, R., & van Crevel, H. (1993). Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke, 24, 320–327.Google Scholar
  5. de Haan, R. J., Limburg, M., van der Meulen, J. H. P., Jacobs, H. M., & Aaronson, N. K. (1995). Quality of life after stroke. Stroke, 26, 402–408.Google Scholar
  6. Dempster, M., & Donnelly, M. (2000). Selecting a measure of health-related quality of life. Social Work in Health Care, 32, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorman, P. J., Slattery, J., Farrell, B., Dennis, M., & Sandercock, P. (1997a). Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke, 28, 1876–1882.Google Scholar
  8. Dorman, P. J., Waddell, F., Slattery, J., Dennis, M., & Sandercock, P. (1997b). Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate and unbiased? Stroke, 28, 1883–1887.Google Scholar
  9. Dorman, P. J., Slattery, J., Farrell, B., Dennis, M., & Sandercock, P. (1998). Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. Stroke, 29, 63–68.Google Scholar
  10. Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Hula, W. D., & Mikolic, J. M. (2003). The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS): validating patient-reported communication difficulty and associated psychological distress in stroke survivors. Aphasiology, 17, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131–2140.Google Scholar
  12. Eurich, D. T., Johnson, J. A., Reid, K. J., & Spertus, J. A. (2006). Assessing responsiveness of generic and specific health related quality of life measures in heart failure. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Kollertis, B., Grimby, G., & Stucki, G. (2007). Content comparison of health related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 16, 833–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glader, E., Stegmayr, B., & Asplund, K. (2002). Poststroke fatigue: a 2-year follow-up study of stroke patients in Sweden. Stroke, 33, 1327–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guyatt, G. H., Berman, L. B., Townsend, M., Pugsley, S. O., & Chambers, L. W. (1987). A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax, 42, 773–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guyatt, G. H., Nogradi, S., Halcrow, S., Singer, J., Sullivan, M. J., & Fallen, E. L. (1989). Development and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in heart failure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guyatt, G. H., Eagle, D. J., Sackett, B., Willan, A., Griffith, L., McIlroy, W., et al. (1993). Measuring quality of life in the frail elderly. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1433–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamedani, A. G., Wells, C. K., Brass, L. M., Kernan, W. N., Viscoli, C. M., Maraire, J. N., et al. (2001). A quality of life instrument for young hemorrhagic stroke patients. Stroke, 32, 687–695.Google Scholar
  20. Hillers, T. K., Guyatt, G. H., & Oldridge, N. (1994). Quality of life after myocardial infarction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47, 1287–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodkinson, H. (1972). Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age and Ageing, 1, 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingles, J. L., Eskes, G. A., & Phillips, S. J. (1999). Fatigue after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, M., Morrison, V., MacWalter, R., & Partridge, C. (1999). Perceived control, coping and recovery from disability following stroke. Psychology & Health, 14, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King, R. B. (1996). Quality of life after stroke. Stroke, 27, 1467–1472.Google Scholar
  25. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, A. J., & Stockler, M. (1998). Quality of life assessment in health care research and practice. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 21, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mathias, S. D., Bates, M. M., Pasta, D. J., Cisternas, M. G., Feeny, D., & Patrick, D. L. (1997). Use of the Health Utilities Index with stroke patients and their caregivers. Stroke, 28, 1888–1894.Google Scholar
  28. Morley, W., Jackson, K., & Mead, G. E. (2005). Post-stroke fatigue: an important yet neglected symptom. Age and Ageing, 19, 84–90.Google Scholar
  29. Naess, H., Nyland, H. I., Thomassen, L., Aarseth, J., & Myhr, K. M. (2005). Fatigue at long-term follow-up in young adults with cerebral infarction. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 20, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nouri, F., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 7, 233–238.Google Scholar
  31. O’Mahony, P. G., Rodgers, H., Thomson, R. G., Dobson, R., & James, O. F. W. (1998). Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? Age & Ageing, 27, 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Owolabi, M. O. (2010). Which is more valid for stroke patients: generic or stroke-specific quality of life measures? Neuroepidemiology, 34, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pickard, A. S., Johnson, J. A., Feeny, D. H., Shuaib, A., Carriere, K. C., & Nasser, A. M. (2004). Agreement between patient and proxy assessments of health-related quality of life after stroke using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Stroke, 35, 607–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qureshi, K., & Hodkinson, M. (1974). Evaluation of a 10 question mental test of the institutionalized elderly. Age and Ageing, 3, 152–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schepers, V. P., Visser-Meily, A. M., Ketelaar, M., & Lindeman, E. (2006). Poststroke fatigue: course and its relation to personal and stroke-related factors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimoda, K., & Robinson, R. G. (1998). Effect of anxiety disorder on impairment and recovery from stroke. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 10, 34–40.Google Scholar
  37. Sneeuw, K. C. A., Aaronson, N. K., de Haan, R. J., & Limburg, M. (1997). Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke, 28, 1541–1549.Google Scholar
  38. Staub, F., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2001). Fatigue after stroke: a major but neglected issue. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 12, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Werf, S. P., van den Broek, H. L. P., Anten, H. W. M., & Bleijenberg, G. (2001). Experience of severe fatigue long after stroke and its relation to depressive symptoms and disease characteristics. European Neurology, 45, 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Gijn, J. (1992). Measurement of outcome in stroke prevention trials. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2(suppl 1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Straten, A., de Haan, R. J., Limburg, M., Schuling, J., Bossuyt, P. M., & van den Bos, G. A. (1997). A stroke-adapted 30 item version of the sickness impact profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke, 28, 2155–2161.Google Scholar
  42. Wade, D. T., Collen, F. M., Robb, G. F., & Warlow, C. P. (1992). Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. British Medical Journal, 304, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ware, J. J., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams, L. S., Weinberger, M., Harris, L. E., Clark, D. O., & Biller, J. (1999). Development of a stroke specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 30, 1362–1369.Google Scholar
  45. Williams, L. S., Bakas, T., Brizendine, E., Plue, L., Tu, W., Hendrie, H., et al. (2006). How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients’ health-related quality of life? Stroke, 37, 2081–2085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. World Health Organization. (1958). The first ten years of the world health organization. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V./The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Russell
    • 1
  • Martin Dempster
    • 2
  • Michael Donnelly
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical SciencesQueen’s University BelfastBelfastIreland
  2. 2.School of PsychologyQueen’s University BelfastBelfastIreland

Personalised recommendations