Advertisement

Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 287–308 | Cite as

Connecting Data to Action: How the Santa Cruz County Community Assessment Project Contributes to Better Outcomes for Youth

  • Deanna ZacharyEmail author
  • Susan Brutschy
  • Sue West
  • Tracy Keenan
  • Abigail Stevens
Article

Abstract

Community indicator projects have the potential to deliver new knowledge about the quality of life in local communities and drive actions to improve them (Phillips 2003; Holden Social Indicators Research 92:429–448, 2009; Memon and Johnstone 2008). However, the connection between the information produced by community indicator projects and the actions taken to improve conditions in communities remains under-researched (Holden Social Indicators Research 92:429–448, 2009; Hezri and Dovers Ecological Economics 60:86–99, 2006). This is because community indicator projects have mainly been conceptualized as producing information for action rather than as part of an action process (Memon and Johnstone 2008). This paper provides a case study of a community indicator project with an explicit plan to move beyond the data and into action. A review of one of the oldest community indicator projects in the United States, the Santa Cruz County Community Assessment Project (CAP) demonstrates how an action oriented community improvement cycle has contributed to measurable improvements for children and youth in one California County. The paper identifies key elements that were important for turning CAP data into local actions and concludes with lessons for community indicator practitioners and questions for future research.

Keywords

Community indicators Quality of life Assessment Action Children and youth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestion for improving this paper.

References

  1. Applied Survey Research (2000). Santa Cruz County community assessment project (pp. 1–338). Santa Cruz, California.Google Scholar
  2. Applied Survey Research (2009a). Safe schools/healthy students: Report to the community (pp. 1–8). Santa Cruz, California.Google Scholar
  3. Applied Survey Research (2009b). Santa Cruz County community assessment project (pp. 1–280). Santa Cruz, California.Google Scholar
  4. Chambers, M. (2004). Quality indicators for progress: A guide to community quality-of-life assessments. Jacksonville: Jacksonville Community Council Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Cobb, C., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from a history of social indicators. San Francisco: Redefining Progress.Google Scholar
  6. Conner, L. (2009). Director, Healthy Kids, Santa Cruz County. Video interview, October 16th 2009, at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
  7. Dluhy, M., & Swartz, N. (2006). Connecting knowledge and policy: the promise of community indicators in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 79(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman, M. (2005). Trying hard is not good enough: How to produce measurable improvements for customers and communities. Victoria: Trafford Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Goeke, M.L. (2010). Executive Director, United Way of Santa Cruz County. Phone interview March 18, 2010.Google Scholar
  10. Go for Health (2004). A comprehensive plan to increase healthy nutrition and regular physical activity among children and youth in Santa Cruz County. http://www.unitedwaysc.org/media/Go_For_Health_Plan--_EmailWeb_version.pdf.
  11. Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. (1992). Communities that care: Action for drug abuse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Hezri, A., & Dovers, S. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: issues for ecological economies. Ecological Economics, 60, 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holden, M. (2009). Community interests and indicator system success. Social Indicators Research, 92, 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchison, J., & Vidal, A. (2004). Symposium: using social capital to help integrate planning theory, research and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 142–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalantari, S. (2009). Director, Go For Health and Jovenes SANOS, Santa Cruz County. Video interview, October 16th 2009, at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
  16. Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners: Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Memon, A., & Johnstone, K. (2008). Institutional barriers to developing community indicators in New Zealand: A preliminary assessment. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, Issue 1, May, 70–91.Google Scholar
  18. Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park, R., & Seidman, D. (1978). Social indicators and social reporting. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 435, America in the Seventies: Some Social Indicators, Jan., 1978, 1–22.Google Scholar
  20. Perez, L. (2009). Director, Safe Schools/Healthy Students, Pajaro Valley Unified School District. Video interview, October 16th 2009 at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
  21. Phillips, R. (2003). Community indicators. Planning Advisory Service, Report Number 517, American Planning Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Results Leadership Group. (2010). Results based accountability testimonials from local United Ways. Bethesda: Results Leadership Group.Google Scholar
  23. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Salvaris, M. (1997). Citizenship and progress. Conference paper presented at Measuring National Progress: A National Conference on Indicators of the Quality and Sustainability of Life in Australia, Canberra, 3–4 July 1997. http://www.anewnz.org.nz/attachments/docs/spre-ms-citizenship-progress.doc.
  25. Santa Cruz County Agricultural Commissioner (2009). Santa Cruz County 2008 Crop Report.Google Scholar
  26. Santa Cruz County, California Presidential General Election, November 4, 2008, Official Elections Results.Google Scholar
  27. Sawicki, D. (2002). Improving community indicator systems: Injecting more social science into the folk movement. Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1), 13–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smolko, R., Strange, C., & Venetoulis, J. (2006). Community indicators handbook. Redefining Progress, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  29. State of California, Department of Finance. (2009). Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail 2000–2050. Sacramento: Department of Finance.Google Scholar
  30. Watkins, M. (2010). County Superintendent of Schools, Santa Cruz County Office of Education. E-mail with authors, March 4, 2010.Google Scholar
  31. Wolfe, G. (2009). Former Director, Health Services Agency, Santa Cruz County. Video interview, October 16th 2009, at http://www.appliedsurveyresearch.org/projects/cap.html.
  32. Zachary, D. (2007). Connecting outcomes to indicators: The Santa Cruz County California community assessment project (CAP). Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases III, 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V./The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deanna Zachary
    • 1
    Email author
  • Susan Brutschy
    • 1
  • Sue West
    • 2
  • Tracy Keenan
    • 1
  • Abigail Stevens
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Survey ResearchWatsonvilleUSA
  2. 2.The McCaughey Centre, Melbourne School of Population HealthUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations