Applied Research in Quality of Life

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 51–64 | Cite as

Measuring Subjective Quality of Life: A Survey to Porto’s Residents

Article

Abstract

The evaluation of the urban quality of life has been an important aspect of the research concerning the contemporary city and an increasingly support to urban planning and management. As part of a project to monitor the quality of life in the city of Porto, a survey of the resident population was conducted in order to study the citizens’ perceptions of their local quality of life and its evolution in recent years. The opinions of individuals on their level of satisfaction with various fields of the urban quality of life are systematised, as well as their integrated assessment. This analysis is complemented by a multivariate analysis that allows the grouping of the interviewees in large homogenous groups and their social and economic characterisation. Based on the results achieved, we try to highlight the usefulness of the qualitative analysis of the quality of life to support the definition of urban policies.

Keywords

Subjective quality of life Multivariate analysis City of Porto 

References

  1. Bannister, J., & Fyfe, N. (2001). Introduction: Fear and the City. Urban Studies, 38(5–6), 807–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58, 403–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnell, J., & Galster, G. (1992). Quality-of-life measurements and urban size: An empirical note. Urban Studies, 29(5), 727–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummins, R. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dissart, J., & Deller, S. (2000). Quality of life in the planning literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(1), 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Escofier, B., & Pagès, J. (1998). Analyses factorielles simples et multiples. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  7. Giannias, D. (1998). A quality of life based ranking of Canadian cities. Urban Studies, 35(12), 2241–2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grayson, L., & Young, K. (1994). Quality of life in cities. An overview and guide to the literature. London: The British Library/London Research Center.Google Scholar
  9. Hudler, M., & Richter, R. (2002). Cross-national comparison of the quality of life in Europe: Inventory of surveys and methods. Social Indicators Research, 58, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Piron, M. (1997). Statistique exploratoire multidimensionnelle (2nd ed). Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  11. Lever, J. (2000). The development of an instrument to measure quality of life in Mexico City. Social Indicators Research, 50, 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lloyd, K., & Auld, C. (2002). The role of leisure in determining quality of life: Issues of content and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 57, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martins, I., & Santos, L. D. (2003). 1st Report on the quality of life – Porto. Porto: Porto City Council.Google Scholar
  14. Nuvolati, G. (1998). La qualità della vita delle città. Teorie, metodi e risultati della ricerche. Milano, Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  15. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being – A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Santos, L. D., & Martins, I. (2007). Monitoring urban quality of life: The Porto experience. Social Indicators Research, 80, 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seik, F. T. (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997–1998). Habitat International, 24, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yuan, L., Yuen, B., & Low, C. (1999). Urban quality of life – Critical issues and options (pp. 1–12). Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media BV/The International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies (ISQOLS) 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Delfim Santos
    • 1
  • Isabel Martins
    • 2
  • Paula Brito
    • 3
  1. 1.CEMPRE, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Studies and Planning DepartmentPorto City CouncilPortoPortugal
  3. 3.LIAAD, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations