Internet Addiction and Perceived Self-Efficacy Among University Students

  • Denise Ziya Berte
  • Fayez Azez MahamidEmail author
  • Saida Affouneh
Original Article


Much concern has been raised of late regarding factors predicting vulnerability to addictive behaviors in general and most recently those related to the newly emerging area of risk of excessive and addictive patterns of use on the internet, including social media and gaming. The current study was designed to investigate the relationship between levels of addictive patterns of internet usage (as related to social media) and perceived self-efficacy among university-aged students in Palestine (a country with some of the highest levels of internet addiction). The sample consisted of 505 university students, selected randomly across area of study. Results indicated a high negative relationship between excessive internet use/addictive patterns of use and perceived self-efficacy. Findings conversely showed no significant differences in internet addiction and perceived self-efficacy dependent on area of study, gender, age or academic level. These conclusions illuminate concerns related to factors of vulnerability as well as possible negative effects of excessive internet use and self-efficacy, especially in the highly sensitive group of university students where behavioral patterns may lead to lifelong habits and/or interfere with developmental and educational tasks and demands. In addition, as self-efficacy is known to be a risk factor in both symptoms of depression and suicidal ideation, further research into this relationship may be critical in devising interventions to both reduce internet addiction and increase self-efficacy during the critical life period of late adolescence.


Addiction Internet addiction Self-efficacy Late adolescence risk factors 



  1. Abu Ghazal, M., & Alawneh, S. (2010). School justice and its relationship to perceived self-efficacy among a sample of school students in Irbid Governorate: developmental study. Damascus University Journal, 26(4), 285–317.Google Scholar
  2. Akin, A., & Iskender, M. (2010). Social self-efficacy, academic locus of control, and internet addiction. Computers in Education, 54(12), 1101–1106. Scholar
  3. Andreou, E., Didaskalou, E., & Vlachou, A. (2013). Bully/victim problems among Greek pupils with special educational needs: associations with loneliness and self-efficacy for peer interactions. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15(4), 235–246. Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an argentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 51(2), 269–290. Scholar
  6. Benight, C., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1129–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mahamid, F. A., & Berte, D. Z. (2018a). Social media addiction in geopolitically at-risk youth. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(1), 102–111. Scholar
  8. Mahamid, F. A., & Berte, D. Z. (2018b). Portrayals of violence and at-risk populations: symptoms of trauma in adolescents with high utilization of social media. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.
  9. Betz, N. E., & Hermann, K. S. (2004). Path models of the relationships of instrumentality and expressiveness to social self-efficacy, shyness, and depressive symptoms. Sex Roles, 51(1-2), 55–66. Scholar
  10. Betz, N. E., & Schifano, R. S. (2000). Evaluation of an intervention to increase realistic self-efficacy and interests in college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(1), 35–52. Scholar
  11. Betz, N. E., & Smith, H. M. (2002). An examination of efficacy and esteem pathways to depression in young adulthood. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 438–448. Scholar
  12. Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boehmer, S., Knoll, N., Luszczynska, A., Mohamed, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Dispositional self-efficacy as a personal resource factor in coping after surgery. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(4), 807–818. Scholar
  14. Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Escaping the self: alcoholism, spirituality, masochism, and other flights from the burden of selfhood. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  15. Chiu, S. (2014). The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on Taiwanese university student: a mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 34(4), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chiu, S.-I., Hong, F.-Y., & Chiu, S.-L. (2013). An analysis on the correlation and gender difference between college students’ internet addiction and mobile phone addiction in Taiwan. ISRN Addiction, 2013, 1–10. Scholar
  17. Chung, C., Kwon, J., & Lee, J. (2011). The effects of escape from self and interpersonal relationship on the pathological use of internet games. Community Mental Health, 47, 113–121. Scholar
  18. Craparo, G., Messina, R., Severino, S., Fasciano, S., Cannella, V., Gori, A., et al. (2014). The relationships between self-efficacy, internet addiction and shame. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 36(3), 302–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Concepts Technologies. (2017). Digital and Social Media Report in Palestine. Retrieved from
  20. Coombs, H. (2004). Handbook of addictive disorders: a practical guide to diagnosis and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
  21. Davis, R.(2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187-195. Scholar
  22. Eastin, M., Lin, C., & Robert, L. (2003). Unregulated internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, 5(3), 225–253. Scholar
  23. Esen, B., & Gundogdu, M. (2010). The relationship between internet addiction, peer pressure and perceived social support among adolescents. Educational Research, 2(1), 29–36.Google Scholar
  24. Gant, M., & Shaw, L. (2002). In defense of the Internet: the relationship between internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 157–171. Scholar
  25. Ha, J., Kim, S., Bae, S. C., Bae, S., Kim, H., Sim, M., Lyoo, I. K., & Cho, S. (2007). Depression and internet addiction in adolescents. Psychopathology, 40, 424–430. Scholar
  26. Ha, J. H., Chin, B., Park, D. H., Ryu, S. H., & Yu, J. (2008). Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 783–784. Scholar
  27. Halley, M., Mark, D., & Ivone, M. (2014). Internet addiction and loneliness among children and adolescents in the education setting: an empirical pilot study. Aloma, 2(1), 91–98.Google Scholar
  28. Hong, Y., Chiu, I., & Huang, H. (2012). A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2152–2159. Scholar
  29. Irena, S., Norman, H., & Xiaobin, H. (2010). Time on the Internet at home, loneliness, and life satisfaction: evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(10), 329–338. Scholar
  30. Kim, J. (2008). The effect of a R/T group counseling program on the internet addiction level and self-esteem of internet addiction university students. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 10(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, D., & Jeong, E. (2011). Social activities, self-efficacy, game attitudes, and game addiction. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 213–221. Scholar
  32. Kim, H. H., & Davis, K. E. (2009). Toward a comprehensive theory of problematic internet use: evaluating the role of self-esteem, anxiety, flow, and the self-rated importance of internet activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 490–500. Scholar
  33. Lee, S. B., Lee, K. K., Paik, K. C., Kim, H. W., & Shin, S. K. (2001). Relationship between internet addiction and anxiety, depression, and self efficacy in middle and high school students. Korean Neuropsychiatry Assoc, 40(6), 1174–1184.Google Scholar
  34. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457. Scholar
  35. McLaughlin, D., & Whitty, M. (2007). Online recreation: the relationship between loneliness, internet self-efficacy and the use of the Internet for entertainment purposes. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1435–1446. Scholar
  36. Napoleoncat. (2019). Facebook users in State of Palestine. Retrieved from
  37. Odaci, H., & Celik, C. (2016). Internet dependence in an undergraduate population: the roles of coping with stress, self-efficacy beliefs, and sex role orientation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(3), 395–409. Scholar
  38. Odaci, H. (2013). Risk-taking behavior and academic self-efficacy as variables accounting for problematic internet use in adolescent university students. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 183–187. Scholar
  39. Odaci, H. (2011). Academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination as predictors of problematic internet use in university students. Computers in Education, 57(7), 1109–1113. Scholar
  40. Pesigan, I., & Shu, U. (2016). Cognitive and psychosocial health risk factors of social networking addiction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14(4), 550–564. Scholar
  41. Sari, S., & Aydin, B. (2015). Internet addiction among adolescents: the role of self-esteem. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(2), 3500–3505. Scholar
  42. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16–32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schwarzer, R., & Warner, L. M. (2013). Perceived self-efficacy and its relationship to resilience. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Springer series on human exceptionality. Resilience in children, adolescents, and adults: Translating research into practice (pp. 139-150). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media. Google Scholar
  44. Walsh, S. P., White, K. M., Cox, S., Young, R., & Mc. D. (2011). Keeping in constant touch: the predictors of young Australians’ mobile phone involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 333–342. Scholar
  45. Yao, M. Z., & Zhong, Z. (2014). Loneliness, social contacts and Internet addiction: A cross-lagged panel study. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 164–170. Scholar
  46. Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction: a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402–415. Scholar
  47. Young, K. S. (2012). Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior Journal, 1(3), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yu, S., Wu, A. M. S., & Pesigan, I. J. A. (2015). Cognitive and psychosocial health risk factors of social networking addiction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14(4), 550–564. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nationalities Service CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.An-Najah National UniversityNablusPalestine

Personalised recommendations