How to Measure Addiction Recovery? Incorporating Perspectives of Individuals with Lived Experience
Recovery from addiction is a complex phenomenon. Without a clear and measureable definition, its ambiguity risks hindering the advancement of recovery-oriented practice and research. The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) understand the meaning of recovery from the perspective of individuals with lived experience and (2) identify measurement domains to inform the development of a recovery monitoring system. We conducted five semi-structured focus groups and two interviews with individuals 18 years and older who completed an addiction treatment program and were enrolled in aftercare. Participants were asked questions about how they personally defined “successful” recovery. Data were analyzed using a general inductive approach through independent parallel coding. We explored emergent themes including the following: Recovery is a process; abstinence is an important aspect of recovery, but not sufficient; recovery is multidimensional; and, recovery requires ongoing commitment. This study identified measurable recovery-oriented outcomes and methodological considerations to inform future recovery monitoring systems.
KeywordsAddiction Substance use Alcohol Health outcomes Recovery
We thank Kayla Deroux and Kathryn Junkin for their assistance with recruitment, data collection, transcription, and preliminary data coding. Special thanks to program staff for their support and effort facilitating recruitment, and to participants for sharing their insights on and experiences in recovery.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (Regional Centre for Excellence in Ethics, Guelph, Ontario, Canada) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare the following potential conflict of interest: Homewood Research Institute is an independent charitable organization funded through a variety of sources including community stakeholders, corporations, private foundations, and philanthropic support from the Schlegel family. The Schlegel family owns Homewood Health.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to being included in the study.
- American Society of Addiction Medicine. (2013). Terminology related to addiction, treatment and recovery. Retrieved from http://www.asam.org/docs/default-source/public-policy-statements/1-terminology-atr-7-135f81099472bc604ca5b7ff000030b21a.pdf?sfvrsn=0
- Best, D., & Laudet, A. (2010). The potential of recovery capital. Accessed Dec.15, 2017 at http://farronline.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/potential-of-recovery-capital.pdf
- Betty Ford Institute (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 221–228.Google Scholar
- Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction (2017). Moving toward a recovery-oriented system of care: A resource for service providers and decision makers. Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
- Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2009). Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. (2008). Substance Use and Misuse, 12-13, 1971–1986.Google Scholar
- Costello, M. J., Ropp, C., Sousa, S., Woo, W., Vedelago, H., & Rush, B. (2016). The development and implementation of an outcome monitoring system for addiction treatment. Canadian Journal of Addiction, 7(3), 15–24.Google Scholar
- Dodge, K., Krantz, B., & Kenny, P. J. (2010). How can we begin to measure recovery? Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 5, 31 Retrieved from http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/5/1/31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Duffy, P. & Baldwin, H. (2013). Recovery post treatment: plans, barriers and motivators. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 8, 6. Retrieved from http://www.substanceabusepolicy.com/content/8/1/6.
- Marcellus, L., MacKinnon, K., Benoit, C., Phillips, R., & Stengel, C. (2015). Reenvisioning success for programs supporting pregnant women with problematic substance use. Qualitative Health Research, 25(4), 500–512.Google Scholar
- McQuaid, R., Malik, A., Moussouni, K., Baydack, N., Stargardter, M., & Morrisey, M. (2017). Life in recovery from addiction in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction Retrieved from http://www.ccsa.ca/Resource%20Library/CCSA-Life-in-Recovery-from-Addiction-Report-2017-en.pdf.Google Scholar
- Neale, J., Finch, E., Marsden, J., Luke, M., Rose, D., Strang, J., Tompkins, C., Wheeler, C., & Wykes, T. (2014). How should we measure addiction recovery? Analysis of service provider perspectives using online Delphi groups. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21(4), 310–323.Google Scholar
- Rush, B. R., Martin, G., & Corea, L. M. (2009). Monitoring alcohol and drug treatment: What would an optimal system look like? Contemporary Drug Problems, 36, 545–574.Google Scholar
- Rush, B. R., Rotondi, N. K., Chau, N., Furlong, A., Godinho, A., Schell, C., Kwong, C., Ehtesham, S. (2013). Drug treatment funding program client recovery monitoring project. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Retrieved from http://eenet.ca/dtfp/client-outcome-monitoring-project/.
- Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2012). SAMHSA’s Working definition of recovery: 10 guiding principles of recovery. Retrieved from https://blog.samhsa.gov/2012/03/23/defintion-of-recovery-updated/#.WOvJwPnyupo
- Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
- White, W., Boyle, M., & Loveland, D. (2005). Recovery from addiction and from mental illness: shared and contrasting lessons. In R. O. Ralph & P. W. Corrigan (Eds.), Recovery in mental illness: Broadening our understanding of wellness (pp. 233–258). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization (2016). International standards for the treatment of drug use disorders. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND/CND_Sessions/CND_59/ECN72016_CRP4_V1601463.pdf