Changes in Mental Health Providers’ Recovery Attitudes and Strengths Model Implementation Following Training and Supervision
- 450 Downloads
The strengths model (SM) is a recovery-oriented model of mental health care. Historically, training alone has been insufficient to ensure implementation of SM skills in practice. The aim of the current study was to determine whether improvements in recovery attitudes and attendance at Strength-Based Group Supervision (SBGS) following training are associated with greater skill implementation in practice. Mental health providers (N = 76) were trained in SM interventions and surveyed immediately before and after training and at a 6-month follow-up on various recovery attitude measures and SBGS attendance. Results showed that providers’ attitudes were significantly improved after completing the training programs; however, only willingness to support consumers in positive goal-oriented risk taking remained significantly improved at 6-month follow-up. The frequency of attendance at SBGS sessions was low, and this may have contributed to a lack of consistent evidence that SBGS attendance was associated with sustained improvements in attitudes or SM skill implementation. Future research is needed to clarify the ability of public sector mental health organizations to successfully implement and sustain SM approaches in practice. The role of ongoing SBGS in this process also requires continued investigation.
KeywordsStrengths model Recovery Training Supervision Attitudes Implementation
The authors would like to thank Julie Jackson and Melissa Aguey-Zinsou for their assistance in collecting data for this study. We would also like to thank Paul Beckett, Sue Martin, and the SESLHD for their efforts in implementing the strengths model training program.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Author Goff, Author Deane, Author Pullman, Author Sommer, and Author Lim declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of Human Rights
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boardman, J., & Roberts, G. (2014). Risk, safety and recovery ImROC Briefing. London: Centre for Mental Health & Mental Health Network, NHS Confederation.Google Scholar
- Crowe, T. P., Deane, F. P., Oades, L. G., Caputi, P., & Morland, K. G. (2006). Effectiveness of a collaborative recovery training program in Australia in promoting positive views about recovery. Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1497–1500. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). Achieving the promise: transforming mental health care in America. President’s new freedom commission on mental health. Rockville, Maryland, USA: Department of Health and Human Service.Google Scholar
- Kishardt, W. (1994). The impact of the strengths model of case management from the consumer perspective. In M. Harris & H. C. Bergman (Eds.), Psychosocial disorders in young people: time trends and their causes. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J., & Slade, M. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(6), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lopez, S. J., & Edwards, L. M. (2008). The interface of counseling psychology and positive psychology: assessing and promoting strengths. In S. Brown & R. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Macias, C., William Farley, O., Jackson, R., & Kinney, R. (1997). Case management in the context of capitation financing: an evaluation of the strengths model. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 24(6), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02042831.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mental Health Commission. (1998). Blueprint for mental health services in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.Google Scholar
- Australian Health Ministers. (2009). National Mental Health Plan 2003–2008. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Community Services.Google Scholar
- Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009). Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Administration Policy Mental Health, 36(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rapp, C. (1998). The strengths model: case management with people suffering from severe and persistent mental illness. Oxford, UK: Oxford Publishing Press.Google Scholar
- Rapp, C. A., & Goscha, R. J. (2006). The strengths model: case management with people with psychiatric disabilities (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rundell, T. (2007). Perceptions of risky goals amongst people with schizophrenia and their support staff. (Postgraduate diploma), Central Queensland University.Google Scholar
- Shepard, G., Boardman, J., & Slade, M. (2008). Making recovery a reality. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
- Siegal, H. A., Rapp, R. C., Kelliher, C. W., Fisher, J. H., Wagner, J. H., & Cole, P. A. (1995). The strengths perspective of case management: a promising inpatient substance abuse treatment enhancement. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 27(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.1995.10471674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tickle, A., Brown, D., & Hayward, M. (2014). Can we risk recovery? A grounded theory of clinical psychologists’ perceptions of risk and recovery-oriented mental health services. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 87(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.2012.02079.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uppal, S., Oades, L. G., Crowe, T. P., & Deane, F. P. (2010). Barriers to transfer of collaborative recovery training into Australian mental health services: implications for the development of evidence-based services. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16(3), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01141.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar